IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i2p88-d1329995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chilean Disaster Response and Alternative Measures for Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Luciana das Dores de Jesus Da Silva

    (Department of Aquatic Systems, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile)

  • Susanne Kubisch

    (Department of Geography, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Mauricio Aguayo

    (Department of Urban Planning, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile)

  • Francisco Castro

    (Earth Science Departament, Chemical Sciences Faculty, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile)

  • Octavio Rojas

    (Department of Urban Planning, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile)

  • Octavio Lagos

    (Water Resources Department, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile)

  • Ricardo Figueroa

    (Department of Aquatic Systems, University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile)

Abstract

Effective DRM aims to identify and minimize both hazards and vulnerabilities of a territory. This case study carried out in Chile analyzes national programs and disaster risk management structures at different administrative levels (national, regional, and municipal) and identifies gaps that contribute to the vulnerability of the current system. The proposed measures and options for improvement presented in this study are based on a literature review of scientific discussions about international governance, disaster risk management, and case studies conducted in Chile. The results indicate that the national disaster risk management plan has been adjusted in recent years, especially after the 2010 Chilean earthquake. The national administration, which is primarily responsible for managing potential risks, as well as the regional and local governments, has been replaced by the National Disaster Prevention and Response System (SINAPRED) in 2021, according to the 21364 law. This law was created to make cities more resilient, contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This change is intended to decentralize disaster risk management, considering local conditions and preventing oversight of disaster risk management, which is not mandatory at the local level. It has also noted some gaps, such as the lack of standardization of emergency and early warning systems and funding at local levels. It is hoped that the system will move forward in this transition period and that the gaps will not affect effective risk management, as they have caused loss of life in past disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Luciana das Dores de Jesus Da Silva & Susanne Kubisch & Mauricio Aguayo & Francisco Castro & Octavio Rojas & Octavio Lagos & Ricardo Figueroa, 2024. "Chilean Disaster Response and Alternative Measures for Improvement," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:88-:d:1329995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/2/88/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/2/88/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Disrupting Risk Governance? A Post-Disaster Politics of Inclusion in the Urban Margins," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 274-283.
    2. Usón, Tomás J. & Klonner, Carolin & Höfle, Bernhard, 2016. "Using participatory geographic approaches for urban flood risk in Santiago de Chile: Insights from a governance analysis," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 62-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "Planning for Exclusion: The Politics of Urban Disaster Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 244-255.
    2. Bustillos Ardaya, A. & Evers, M. & Ribbe, L., 2019. "Participatory approaches for disaster risk governance? Exploring participatory mechanisms and mapping to close the communication gap between population living in flood risk areas and authorities in No," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Jelena Vukomanovic & Megan M. Skrip & Ross K. Meentemeyer, 2019. "Making It Spatial Makes It Personal: Engaging Stakeholders with Geospatial Participatory Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Anja Nygren & Florencia Quesada, 2020. "Imagining Cities of Inclusion—Formulating Spaces of Justice," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 200-205.
    5. Delgado, Alina & Scheers, Joris, 2021. "Participatory process for land readjustment as a strategy to gain the right to territory: The case of San José–Samborondón–Guayaquil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Thomas Meixner & Alan R. Berkowitz & Alisen E. Downey & Jose Pillich & Reese LeVea & Brianne K. Smith & Mark Chandler & Neha Gupta & Stan Rullman & Anna Woodroof & Jennifer Cherrier, 2021. "Rapid Assessment and Long-Term Monitoring of Green Stormwater Infrastructure with Citizen Scientists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Bram Oosterbroek & Joop de Kraker & Sandra Akkermans & Paola Esser & Pim Martens, 2024. "Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents’ Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:88-:d:1329995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.