IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i3p274-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disrupting Risk Governance? A Post-Disaster Politics of Inclusion in the Urban Margins

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Fuentealba

    (Department of Human Geography, Planning and International Development, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Hebe Verrest

    (Department of Human Geography, Planning and International Development, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Facing climate emergency and disaster risks, cities are developing governing arrangements towards sustainability and resilience. Research is showing the ambivalent results of these arrangements in terms of inclusion and (in)justice, as well as their outcomes in emptying the ‘properly political’ through depoliticised governing techniques. Acknowledging this post-political thesis, however, critical analyses must also engage with re-politicization and focus on disruptive and transformative governance efforts. This article addresses the dual dynamics of de—and re-politicisation, focusing on the interplay of different modes of governing urban risk. We follow the political philosophy of Jacques Rancière and related interpretations in critical urban studies to recover the politics of the city. We focus on a post-disaster area in the foothills of Santiago, Chile. After a 1993 disaster, the State constituted a mode of governing risks based on physicalist interventions that discouraged local conflicts. This techno-managerial policing order made risks invisible while favouring real estate development. However, we show how local initiatives emerge in the interstices of formal and informal arrangements that contest this course. This emerging mode of governing risk, we argue, has the potential to recover incrementally urban politics and disrupt the dominant one through an egalitarian principle on the margins. Our contribution shows that, although these modes of governance coexist and are still evolving, advancing more just and inclusive cities require moving beyond consensus-based governance and focusing on the role of dissent and disruptive politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Disrupting Risk Governance? A Post-Disaster Politics of Inclusion in the Urban Margins," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 274-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v5:y:2020:i:3:p:274-283
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v5i3.3210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3210
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v5i3.3210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Khristine Alvarez & Kenneth Cardenas, 2019. "Evicting Slums, ‘Building Back Better’: Resiliency Revanchism and Disaster Risk Management in Manila," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 227-249, March.
    2. Erik Swyngedouw, 2009. "The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 601-620, September.
    3. Vicente Sandoval & Martin Voss, 2016. "Disaster Governance and Vulnerability: The Case of Chile," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 107-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Disrupting Risk Governance? A Post-Disaster Politics of Inclusion in the Urban Margins," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 274-283.
    2. Ricardo Fuentealba & Hebe Verrest & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "Planning for Exclusion: The Politics of Urban Disaster Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 244-255.
    3. Erik Swyngedouw & Joseph Williams, 2017. "The pleasures of hydro-controversies: a reply to Leandro del Moral, Julia Martínez and Nuria Hernández-Mora," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 339-341, April.
    4. Andrew Clarke & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The post-political state? The role of administrative reform in managing tensions between urban growth and liveability in Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3545-3562, December.
    5. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Hillary Angelo & David Wachsmuth, 2015. "Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 16-27, January.
    7. Aryana Soliz, 2021. "Creating Sustainable Cities through Cycling Infrastructure? Learning from Insurgent Mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Ross Beveridge & Philippe Koch, 2017. "The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 31-43, January.
    9. Laurence Troy, 2018. "The politics of urban renewal in Sydney’s residential apartment market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1329-1345, May.
    10. Janet Newman, 2014. "Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3290-3305, November.
    11. Byron Miller & Samuel Mössner, 2020. "Urban sustainability and counter-sustainability: Spatial contradictions and conflicts in policy and governance in the Freiburg and Calgary metropolitan regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(11), pages 2241-2262, August.
    12. Canoy, Nico A. & Robles, Augil Marie Q. & Roxas, Gilana Kim T., 2022. "Bodies-in-waiting as infrastructure: Assembling the Philippine Government's disciplinary quarantine response to COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    13. Marit Rosol & Vincent Béal & Samuel Mössner, 2017. "Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1710-1718, August.
    14. Joshi, Deepa & Platteeuw, J. & Teoh, J., . "The consensual politics of development: a case study of hydropower development in the eastern Himalayan region of India," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 5(1):74-98..
    15. Ingolfur Blühdorn & Michael Deflorian, 2019. "The Collaborative Management of Sustained Unsustainability: On the Performance of Participatory Forms of Environmental Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Gordon MacLeod, 2013. "New Urbanism/Smart Growth in the Scottish Highlands: Mobile Policies and Post-politics in Local Development Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2196-2221, August.
    17. Seowoo Nam & Seung‐Ook Lee, 2023. "URBAN REGENERATION IN SEOUL: Alternative Urbanism or the Resilience of Neoliberal Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 601-623, July.
    18. Jean Hillier, 2009. "Assemblages of Justice: The ‘Ghost Ships’ of Graythorp," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 640-661, September.
    19. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    20. Filippo Menga & Michael K. Goodman, 2022. "The High Priests of Global Development: Capitalism, Religion and the Political Economy of Sacrifice in a Celebrity‐led Water Charity," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(4), pages 705-735, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v5:y:2020:i:3:p:274-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.