IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i5p268-d1138084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livelihood Strategies during the COVID-19 Epidemic in Materially Disadvantaged Roma Communities from Covasna County, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Valér Veres

    (Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Department of Sociology and Social Work in Hungarian, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the livelihood strategies related to the labour market during the coronavirus pandemic in the context of the material and income situation in Roma communities in a multicultural rural area of Covasna County, Romania. The data source comprises adapted sociological research that was carried out using multiple methods in 2021, in three localities: Boroșneu, Ojdula, and Zăbala in Covasna County, Romania. Of the dimensions examined, housing deprivation, material deprivation, and unemployment were of particular importance. Based on these dimensions, we analyzed the local economic situation and social services; we then developed a typology of dimensions to analyze the livelihood strategies of Roma groups from different socio-economic backgrounds during the coronavirus pandemic. We tried to answer questions about the changes and ways of adaptation in the livelihood strategies of Roma communities to the restrictions that occurred during the coronavirus pandemic in Romania from 2020–2021. The results of the research show that during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, the material and income situations worsened for people previously employed in the informal labour market, involved in precarious work, and those of very low work intensity in selected rural Roma communities in Covasna County. Neither the regulations and legal measures introduced, nor the social protection system, was sensitive to the needs of the Roma, who were the most vulnerable to the social consequences of the pandemic restrictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Valér Veres, 2023. "Livelihood Strategies during the COVID-19 Epidemic in Materially Disadvantaged Roma Communities from Covasna County, Romania," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:268-:d:1138084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/5/268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/5/268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Remus Gabriel Anghel & László Fosztó, 2022. "A Generational Divide? Coping With Ethnic Prejudice and Inequality Among Romanian Roma Transnational Returnees," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 105-114.
    2. Richard Waldron, 2021. "Housing, place and populism: Towards a research agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1219-1229, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. CORMAN Sorina & SASSU Raluca, 2023. "Socio-Economic Aspects Of Work And The Labour Market In Four Roma Communities In Romania," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(3), pages 108-117, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aija Lulle, 2022. "Life Course Justice and Learning," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 76-78.
    2. Luis Eduardo López Flores & Manuel Toledano-Ayala & Juvenal Rodríguez-Reséndiz & Miguel Ángel Rubio Toledo, 2023. "Materiality of Precarious Housing and Its Relationship with Perception in Society: Case Study in Municipality of Pinal de Amoles," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Coșciug Anatolie, 2023. "Editorial Introduction: Exploring Return Migration and its Transformative Potential in Romania and Beyond," Social Change Review, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:268-:d:1138084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.