IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i2p85-d1061810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Political Debate over the COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter: Emotions and Polarization in the Spanish Public Sphere

Author

Listed:
  • Concha Pérez-Curiel

    (Department of Periodismo II, Facultad de Comunicación, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Ricardo Domínguez-García

    (Department of Periodismo II, Facultad de Comunicación, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Ana Velasco-Molpeceres

    (Department of Periodismo II, Facultad de Comunicación, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

In a scenario marked by COVID-19, communication has posed a real challenge for institutions. Since the first case of COVID-19, Spain has faced the enormous challenge of an unprecedented health, economic, and social crisis. The public sphere has put its trust in vaccination as the only chance for the country’s recovery. To determine the role played by political leaders in the debate on vaccination and citizens’ perception of crisis management, this article analyzes the messages posted on Twitter by the four leaders of the parties with the most representation in parliament: Pedro Sánchez (PSOE), Pablo Casado (PP), Santiago Abascal (Vox), and Yolanda Díaz (Podemos). Using a methodology for comparative content analysis on Twitter, a sample was established that began at the start of the vaccination process and inoculation with the first dose, and covered the entire year that followed. The research results, which contrasted with those collected in demographic surveys, reflected an increase in polarization and electoral use of the vaccine, which took precedence over the awareness-raising discourse typical of public campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • Concha Pérez-Curiel & Ricardo Domínguez-García & Ana Velasco-Molpeceres, 2023. "Exploring the Political Debate over the COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter: Emotions and Polarization in the Spanish Public Sphere," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:85-:d:1061810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/2/85/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/2/85/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidi J. Larson, 2020. "Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7803), pages 306-306, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Dan & Jiwen Song, Lynda & Zheng, Xiaoming & Zhu, Jinlong & Zhang, Mengyi & Xu, Lingxiao, 2022. "Extending a helping hand: How receiving gratitude makes a difference in employee performance during a crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 967-982.
    2. Aida El-Far Cardo & Thomas Kraus & Andrea Kaifie, 2021. "Factors That Shape People’s Attitudes towards the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany—The Influence of MEDIA, Politics and Personal Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Gruener, Sven, 2019. "An empirical study on Internet-based false news stories: experiences, problem awareness, and responsibilities," SocArXiv xbez9, Center for Open Science.
    4. María Jesús Fernández-Torres & Ana Almansa-Martínez & Rocío Chamizo-Sánchez, 2021. "Infodemic and Fake News in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Josh Bullock & Justin E. Lane & F. LeRon Shults, 2022. "What causes COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? Ignorance and the lack of bliss in the United Kingdom," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Christopher B. Raymond & Paul R. Ward, 2021. "Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-26, November.
    7. Alessandro Lovari, 2020. "Spreading (Dis)Trust: Covid-19 Misinformation and Government Intervention in Italy," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 458-461.
    8. Kyza, Eleni A. & Varda, Christiana & Panos, Dionysis & Karageorgiou, Melina & Komendantova-Amann, Nadejda & Coppolino Perfumi, Serena & Shah, Syed Iftikhar Husain & Hosseini, Akram Sadat, 2020. "Combating misinformation online: Re-imagining social media for policy-making," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24.
    9. Takele T. Desta & Tewodros Mulugeta, 2020. "Living with COVID-19-triggered pseudoscience and conspiracies," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(6), pages 713-714, July.
    10. Qiang Chen & Yangyi Zhang & Richard Evans & Chen Min, 2021. "Why Do Citizens Share COVID-19 Fact-Checks Posted by Chinese Government Social Media Accounts? The Elaboration Likelihood Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Takele T. Desta & Tewodros Mulugeta, 0. "Living with COVID-19-triggered pseudoscience and conspiracies," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 0, pages 1-2.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:85-:d:1061810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.