IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10058-d642653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do Citizens Share COVID-19 Fact-Checks Posted by Chinese Government Social Media Accounts? The Elaboration Likelihood Model

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Chen

    (School of Journalism and New Media, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Yangyi Zhang

    (School of Journalism and New Media, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Richard Evans

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Chen Min

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Widespread misinformation about COVID-19 poses a significant threat to citizens long-term health and the combating of the disease. To fight the spread of misinformation, Chinese governments have used official social media accounts to participate in fact-checking activities. This study aims to investigate why citizens share fact-checks about COVID-19 and how to promote this activity. Based on the elaboration likelihood model, we explore the effects of peripheral cues (social media capital, social media strategy, media richness, and source credibility) and central cues (content theme and content importance) on the number of shares of fact-checks posted by official Chinese Government social media accounts. In total, 820 COVID-19 fact-checks from 413 Chinese Government Sina Weibo accounts were obtained and evaluated. Results show that both peripheral and central cues play important roles in the sharing of fact-checks. For peripheral cues, social media capital and media richness significantly promote the number of shares. Compared with the push strategy, both the pull strategy and networking strategy facilitate greater fact-check sharing. Fact-checks posted by Central Government social media accounts receive more shares than local government accounts. For central cues, content importance positively predicts the number of shares. In comparison to fact-checks about the latest COVID-19 news, government actions received fewer shares, while social conditions received more shares.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Chen & Yangyi Zhang & Richard Evans & Chen Min, 2021. "Why Do Citizens Share COVID-19 Fact-Checks Posted by Chinese Government Social Media Accounts? The Elaboration Likelihood Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10058-:d:642653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nic Fleming, 2020. "Coronavirus misinformation, and how scientists can help to fight it," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7814), pages 155-156, July.
    2. Maity, Moutusy & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2018. "The impact of media richness on consumer information search and choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 36-45.
    3. Heidi J. Larson, 2020. "Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7803), pages 306-306, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Dan & Jiwen Song, Lynda & Zheng, Xiaoming & Zhu, Jinlong & Zhang, Mengyi & Xu, Lingxiao, 2022. "Extending a helping hand: How receiving gratitude makes a difference in employee performance during a crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 967-982.
    2. Aida El-Far Cardo & Thomas Kraus & Andrea Kaifie, 2021. "Factors That Shape People’s Attitudes towards the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany—The Influence of MEDIA, Politics and Personal Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Gruener, Sven, 2019. "An empirical study on Internet-based false news stories: experiences, problem awareness, and responsibilities," SocArXiv xbez9, Center for Open Science.
    4. María Jesús Fernández-Torres & Ana Almansa-Martínez & Rocío Chamizo-Sánchez, 2021. "Infodemic and Fake News in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tam-Tri Le & Viet-Phuong La & Huyen Thanh Thanh Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Quy Khuc & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2022. "Covid-19 vaccines production and societal immunization under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management theory and conceptual framework," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    7. Sreejesh, S. & Ghosh, Tathagata & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Moving beyond the content: The role of contextual cues in the effectiveness of gamification of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 88-101.
    8. Yuanyuan Guo & Xiaoting Chen & Chaoyou Wang, 2023. "Consumer Information Search in Live-Streaming: Product Involvement and the Moderating Role of Scarcity Promotion and Impulsiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Tajdini, Saeed, 2021. "The effects of the subjective-experiential knowledge gap on consumers’ information search behavior and perceptions of consumption risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 66-77.
    10. Josh Bullock & Justin E. Lane & F. LeRon Shults, 2022. "What causes COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? Ignorance and the lack of bliss in the United Kingdom," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Christopher B. Raymond & Paul R. Ward, 2021. "Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Mencarelli, Rémi & Rivière, Arnaud & Lombart, Cindy, 2021. "Do myriad e-channels always create value for customers? A dynamic analysis of the perceived value of a digital information product during the usage phase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. Lipić, Tomislav & Štajduhar, Andrija & Medvidović, Luka & Wild, Dorian & Korošak, Dean & Podobnik, Boris, 2022. "Stringency without efficiency is not adequate to combat pandemics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Alessandro Lovari, 2020. "Spreading (Dis)Trust: Covid-19 Misinformation and Government Intervention in Italy," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 458-461.
    15. Marion Garaus, 2020. "The influence of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 244-259, December.
    16. Gruener, Sven & Krüger, Felix, 2020. "Infodemics: Do healthcare professionals detect corona-related false news stories better than students?," SocArXiv 86j5v, Center for Open Science.
    17. Melissa MacKay & Taylor Colangeli & Daniel Gillis & Jennifer McWhirter & Andrew Papadopoulos, 2021. "Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Uhm, Jun-Phil & Kim, Sanghoon & Do, Chanwook & Lee, Hyun-Woo, 2022. "How augmented reality (AR) experience affects purchase intention in sport E-commerce: Roles of perceived diagnosticity, psychological distance, and perceived risks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Kuo-Lun Hsiao & Chia-Chen Chen & Kuan-Yu Lin & Hui-Ya Hsu, 2023. "What drives online-to-offline purchase intention in a VR store? An examination of affective and cognitive factors," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3499-3521, August.
    20. Kyza, Eleni A. & Varda, Christiana & Panos, Dionysis & Karageorgiou, Melina & Komendantova-Amann, Nadejda & Coppolino Perfumi, Serena & Shah, Syed Iftikhar Husain & Hosseini, Akram Sadat, 2020. "Combating misinformation online: Re-imagining social media for policy-making," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10058-:d:642653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.