IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i2p58-d1041564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Helping or Controlling? Choice of Coping Methods When Dealing with Violent Clients in Statutory Social Work

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmy Stephen Munobwa

    (Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Peter Öberg

    (Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

  • Fereshteh Ahmadi

    (Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden)

Abstract

Client violence in social work is a workplace problem in Sweden and internationally. Frontline workers in public agencies have the discretion to decide how they deal with clients to cope with challenges like violence and threats. The coping methods may favour some clients while disadvantaging others. Ultimately, the coping practices may become de facto policy, which may not match official organisational policy. This article explores coping methods statutory social workers use to manage violence and threats in their day-to-day dyadic interactions with clients. The article is based on qualitative interviews with social workers ( n = 19) who, according to their perception, were victims of client violence. Theory on street-level bureaucracy and frontline workers’ discretion is used. Based on thematic analysis, the results show that social workers draw from four groups of coping methods depending on their moral and normative dispositions. These include (1) the forced helper, (2) the compassionate helper, (3) the distanced helper, and (4) the authoritarian helper. Social workers oscillate between different dispositions depending on situational needs, striving to find the appropriate balance between helping and controlling clients. Studying social workers’ day-to-day dyadic interactions with clients highlights how coping methods could shape social work policy and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmy Stephen Munobwa & Peter Öberg & Fereshteh Ahmadi, 2023. "Helping or Controlling? Choice of Coping Methods When Dealing with Violent Clients in Statutory Social Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:58-:d:1041564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/2/58/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/2/58/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Littlechild & Susan Hunt & Chris Goddard & Judy Cooper & Barry Raynes & James Wild, 2016. "The Effects of Violence and Aggression From Parents on Child Protection Workers’ Personal, Family, and Professional Lives," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440156, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boonzaaier, Emma & Truter, Elmien & Fouché, Ansie, 2021. "Occupational risk factors in child protection social work: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Wise, Karlissa & Carter, LaToya & Bamba, Leslie Alyssa & Barr, Rachel, 2024. "How Do Child Protective Service (CPS) Policies Keep Employees Safe: ACaseworker’s Perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Lamothe, Josianne & Geoffrion, Steve & Couvrette, Amélie & Guay, Stéphane, 2021. "Supervisor support and emotional labor in the context of client aggression," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:58-:d:1041564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.