IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i10p560-d1255232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamics of Change in United States Foreign Policy: Contexts, Leadership, and Hegemonic Legitimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Emanuel Mendes

    (Portuguese Institute of International Relations (IPRI), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua D. Estefânia, 195, 5º Dto., 1000-155 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

This article examines the dialectical relationship between continuity and change in the foreign policy of the United States, a hegemonic power. The article begins by exploring the agent–structure problem and the factors that affect changes in foreign policy and the legitimacy of hegemony. It compares the hegemonic leadership styles of three former United States Presidents: George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump. The article aims to contrast the foreign policy approaches of the three presidents and present two main arguments. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of foreign policy, it is imperative to analyse dynamic components such as contextual factors and leadership. This includes the leaders’ worldviews and their ability to adapt to unanticipated crises. The gradual decline of the United States’ hegemony in the international order can be attributed to structural transformations within the international order and the erosion of its social capital and its role as hegemon. Yet, the leadership styles adopted by American presidents have a significant impact on the erosion of the nation’s hegemonic leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Emanuel Mendes, 2023. "The Dynamics of Change in United States Foreign Policy: Contexts, Leadership, and Hegemonic Legitimacy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:560-:d:1255232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/10/560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/10/560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisbeth Aggestam & Adrian Hyde‐Price, 2019. "Double Trouble: Trump, Transatlantic Relations and European Strategic Autonomy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 114-127, September.
    2. Ikenberry, G. John & Kupchan, Charles A., 1990. "Socialization and hegemonic power," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 283-315, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scholvin, Sören, 2017. "Secondary Powers vis-à-vis South Africa: Hard Balancing, Soft Balancing, Rejection of Followership, and Disregard of Leadership," GIGA Working Papers 306, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Druscilla Scribner & Tracy Slagter, 2017. "Recursive Norm Development: The Role of Supranational Courts," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 322-332, September.
    3. Hulvey, Rachel A, 2022. "Cyber Sovereignty: How China is Changing the Rules of Internet Freedom," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt7sg3716k, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    4. Craig N. Murphy, 2006. "Forum 2006," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 37(6), pages 1293-1307, November.
    5. Davis B. Bobrow & Mark A. Boyer, 1997. "Maintaining System Stability," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(6), pages 723-748, December.
    6. Gunitsky, Seva, 2014. "From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 561-597, July.
    7. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    8. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    9. Andrea Carati & Andrea Locatelli, 2023. "All the President's men. Leadership style, advisory system and Donald Trump's mixed record in foreign policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 95-106, February.
    10. Giles Scott-Smith, 2008. "Mapping the Undefinable: Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Exchange Programs within International Relations Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 616(1), pages 173-195, March.
    11. Kadir Jun Ayhan, 2023. "Soft power is rare in world politics: Ruling out fear- and appetite-based compliance," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 476-486, December.
    12. Obert Hodzi, 2018. "Delegitimization and ‘Re-socialization’: China and the Diffusion of Alternative Norms in Africa," International Studies, , vol. 55(4), pages 297-314, October.
    13. Jean-Frédéric Morin & Richard E. Gold, 2014. "An Integrated Model of Legal Transplantation: The Diffusion of Intellectual Property Law in Developing Countries," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/149496, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Prys, Miriam, 2008. "Developing a Contextually Relevant Concept of Regional Hegemony: The Case of South Africa, Zimbabwe and "Quiet Diplomacy"," GIGA Working Papers 77, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    15. Nabers, Dirk, 2008. "China, Japan and the Quest for Leadership in East Asia," GIGA Working Papers 67, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    16. Sebastian Santander & Antonios Vlassis, 2021. "The EU in Search of Autonomy in the Era of Chinese Expansionism and COVID‐19 Pandemic," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 149-156, February.
    17. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 912-938.
    18. Geoffrey P.R. Wallace, 2008. "Alliances, Institutional Design, and the Determinants of Military Strategy," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 224-243, July.
    19. Elijah Nyaga Munyi, 2016. "Beyond Asymmetry: Substantive Beliefs in Preference Formation and Efficiency of Asymmetrical Negotiations," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 49-68, February.
    20. Bjørnar Sverdrup-Thygeson, 2017. "The bear and the EU-China-US triangle: transatlantic and Russian influences on EU’s “pivot to Asia”," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 161-172, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:560-:d:1255232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.