IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v15y2017i2d10.1007_s10308-017-0472-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bear and the EU-China-US triangle: transatlantic and Russian influences on EU’s “pivot to Asia”

Author

Listed:
  • Bjørnar Sverdrup-Thygeson

    (Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI))

Abstract

This chapter argues that in the case of the EU’s efforts to undertake a “Pivot to Asia”, added explanatory salience can be achieved by recognising firstly the importance of the transatlantic factor and the US’ own rebalance policies. Secondly, based on a model where the USA is regarded as a significant variable in the EU-China relationship, one may more saliently discern the influence of Russia by assessing its impact on the triangular EU-China-US relationship, both directly and indirectly. Addressing these issues in European policymaking, the chapter will be constituted of two main parts. In the first section, the triangular nature of European foreign policies towards China is introduced, addressing the transatlantic factor in EU-China relations. Based on research on the European policy debates on EU’s Asia policies and the American Pivot to Asia, the section will illustrate the degree to which EU policy initiatives are conceived as playing out on a range from cooperation to competition with the US’ rebalance initiatives. In the second section, the chapter will proceed to investigate a factor that is affecting, although to different degrees, all three corners of the triangular political context in which European China policies are being shaped, namely the effects of recent Russian actions in the Eurasian theatre. The analysis demonstrates how European policymakers struggle to define their place in the EU-China-US triangle. The dynamics of the ongoing Asian power shift highlights the dilemmas for the European continent, as it seeks to balance its relations in a shifting geopolitical landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjørnar Sverdrup-Thygeson, 2017. "The bear and the EU-China-US triangle: transatlantic and Russian influences on EU’s “pivot to Asia”," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 161-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0472-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-017-0472-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-017-0472-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-017-0472-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikenberry, G. John & Kupchan, Charles A., 1990. "Socialization and hegemonic power," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 283-315, July.
    2. Hemmer, Christopher & Katzenstein, Peter J., 2002. "Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(3), pages 575-607, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Turner, 2019. "Subcontracting, facilitating and qualities of regional power: the UK’s partial pivot to Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 211-226, June.
    2. Thomas Christiansen & Richard Maher, 2017. "The rise of China—challenges and opportunities for the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-131, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis B. Bobrow & Mark A. Boyer, 1997. "Maintaining System Stability," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(6), pages 723-748, December.
    2. Gunitsky, Seva, 2014. "From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 561-597, July.
    3. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    4. Giles Scott-Smith, 2008. "Mapping the Undefinable: Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Exchange Programs within International Relations Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 616(1), pages 173-195, March.
    5. Averell Schmidt, 2024. "Treaty withdrawal and the development of international law," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 785-808, October.
    6. Obert Hodzi, 2018. "Delegitimization and ‘Re-socialization’: China and the Diffusion of Alternative Norms in Africa," International Studies, , vol. 55(4), pages 297-314, October.
    7. Anja Jetschke, 2010. "Do Regional Organizations Travel? - European Integration, Diffusion and the Case of ASEAN," KFG Working Papers p0017, Free University Berlin.
    8. Jean-Frédéric Morin & Richard E. Gold, 2014. "An Integrated Model of Legal Transplantation: The Diffusion of Intellectual Property Law in Developing Countries," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/149496, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Prys, Miriam, 2008. "Developing a Contextually Relevant Concept of Regional Hegemony: The Case of South Africa, Zimbabwe and "Quiet Diplomacy"," GIGA Working Papers 77, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    10. Nam-Kook Kim, 2009. "European experience for East Asian integration: ideas, national interests, and the international circumstance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 295-312, June.
    11. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    12. Elijah Nyaga Munyi, 2016. "Beyond Asymmetry: Substantive Beliefs in Preference Formation and Efficiency of Asymmetrical Negotiations," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 49-68, February.
    13. Jon Pevehouse & Timothy Nordstrom & Kevin Warnke, 2004. "The Correlates of War 2 International Governmental Organizations Data Version 2.0," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(2), pages 101-119, April.
    14. M. V. Bratersky & G. I. Kutyrev, 2019. "Russia between Two Systems: Transit from The Atlantic World into the Eurasian- Pacific One," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 12(1).
    15. Frederick Kliem, 2020. "Why Quasi-Alliances Will Persist in the Indo-Pacific? The Fall and Rise of the Quad," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 7(3), pages 271-304, December.
    16. Sonia Lucarelli, 2014. "Security Governance: making the concept fit for the analysis of a multipolar, global and regionalized world," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers p0380, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    17. Katherine M. Beall, 2024. "Empowering to constrain: Procedural checks in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 443-468, September.
    18. Dong Wang & Alastair Iain Johnston & Baoyu Wang, 2021. "The Effect of Imagined Social Contact on Chinese Students’ Perceptions of Japanese People," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(1), pages 223-251, January.
    19. Mason Richey, 2019. "US-led Alliances and Contemporary International Security Disorder: Comparative Responses of the Transatlantic and Asia-Pacific Alliance Systems," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 6(3), pages 275-298, December.
    20. Inkyoung Kim, 2014. "Messages from a middle power: participation by the Republic of Korea in regional environmental cooperation on transboundary air pollution issues," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 147-162, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:15:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0472-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.