IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i12p552-d986120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Relevance of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Analyze Public Policies in Non-Pluralist Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Viengsamay Sengchaleun

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Hina Hakim

    (Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

  • Sengchanh Kounnavong

    (Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health, Vientiane Capital 01030, Laos)

  • Daniel Reinharz

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada)

Abstract

The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theoretical approach developed for the study of the emergence of public policies in pluralist countries. Little is known about the relevance of the framework for the study of policies in non-pluralist countries (NPCs). A review of the literature was conducted on the use of ACF in studies performed in NPCs. Nineteen documents were identified. They were based on studies conducted in China, Laos, and Vietnam. The results show that the ACF is a powerful theoretical approach for highlighting the dynamics of interactions between coalitions that exist in NPCs, as in pluralist countries, and for highlighting their specificity. ACF is a relevant tool for the study of the determinants of the emergence of public policies in NPCs.

Suggested Citation

  • Viengsamay Sengchaleun & Hina Hakim & Sengchanh Kounnavong & Daniel Reinharz, 2022. "Analysis of the Relevance of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Analyze Public Policies in Non-Pluralist Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:552-:d:986120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/12/552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shantayanan Devarajan & Stuti Khemani, 2018. "If Politics is the Problem, How Can External Actors be Part of the Solution?," International Economic Association Series, in: Kaushik Basu & Tito Cordella (ed.), Institutions, Governance and the Control of Corruption, chapter 8, pages 209-251, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Cai, Yongshun, 2008. "Power Structure and Regime Resilience: Contentious Politics in China," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 411-432, July.
    3. Embrett, Mark G. & Randall, G.E., 2014. "Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: Exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 147-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thibaud Deguilhem & Juliette Schlegel & Jean-Philippe Berrou & Ousmane Djibo & Alain Piveteau, 2024. "Too many options: How to identify coalitions in a policy network?," Post-Print hal-04689665, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sudeepa Khanal & Lira Ramadani & Melanie Boeckmann, 2022. "Health Equity in Climate Change Policies and Public Health Policies Related to Climate Change: Protocol for a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Pushkar Maitra & Sandip Mitra & Dilip Mookherjee & Sujata Visaria, 2020. "Decentralized Targeting of Agricultural Credit Programs: Private versus Political Intermediaries," HKUST IEMS Working Paper Series 2020-70, HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies, revised Jan 2020.
    3. Gu, Hongyan, 2016. "NIMBYism in China: Issues and prospects of public participation in facility siting," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 527-534.
    4. Chen Li & Mark Yaolin Wang & Jennifer Day, 2021. "Reconfiguration of state–society relations: The making of uncompromising nail households in urban housing demolition and relocation in Dalian, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1581-1597, June.
    5. Khemani,Stuti, 2020. "An Opportunity to Build Legitimacy and Trust in Public Institutions in the Time of COVID-19," Research and Policy Briefs 148256, The World Bank.
    6. Baxter Jamie, 2019. "Leadership, Law and Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 119-158, January.
    7. Scott J. Fitzpatrick & Bronwyn K. Brew & Donna M. Y. Read & Kerry J. Inder & Alan Hayes & David Perkins, 2019. "Rethinking Suicide in Rural Australia: A study Protocol for Examining and Applying Knowledge of the Social Determinants to Improve Prevention in Non-Indigenous Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Helen Van Eyk & Elizabeth Harris & Fran Baum & Toni Delany-Crowe & Angela Lawless & Colin MacDougall, 2017. "Health in All Policies in South Australia—Did It Promote and Enact an Equity Perspective?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, October.
    9. Harris, Patrick & Kent, Jennifer & Sainsbury, Peter & Thow, Anne Marie, 2016. "Framing health for land-use planning legislation: A qualitative descriptive content analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 42-51.
    10. Carol Bacchi, 2016. "Problematizations in Health Policy," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    11. Youlang Zhang & Hongshan Yang, 2023. "Bureaucratic politics, innovation compatibility, and the dynamic diffusion of subnational decentralization reforms in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 553-572, July.
    12. Xinyu Fan & Feng Yang, 2019. "Strategic promotion, reputation, and responsiveness in bureaucratic hierarchies," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(3), pages 286-307, July.
    13. Chen, Huirong, 2022. "Linking institutional function with form: Distributional dynamics, disequilibrium, and rural land shareholding in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Zhang Qi & Liu Mingxing, 2010. "Local Political Elite, Partial Reform Symptoms, and the Business and Market Environment in Rural China," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-41, April.
    15. Galetsi, Panagiota & Katsaliaki, Korina & Kumar, Sameer, 2022. "The medical and societal impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence applications in combating pandemics: A review focused on Covid-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    16. Jinrui Xi, 2018. "Sustainable Legitimacy: Chinese Government Inspections and Public Approval of Village Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    17. World Bank, 2018. "World Development Report 2018 [Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2018]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28340.
    18. Friel, Sharon & Townsend, Belinda & Fisher, Matthew & Harris, Patrick & Freeman, Toby & Baum, Fran, 2021. "Power and the people's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    19. McGreevy, Michael & Harris, Patrick & Delaney-Crowe, Toni & Fisher, Matt & Sainsbury, Peter & Riley, Emily & Baum, Fran, 2020. "How well do Australian government urban planning policies respond to the social determinants of health and health equity?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Jones, Catherine M. & Clavier, Carole & Potvin, Louise, 2017. "Adapting public policy theory for public health research: A framework to understand the development of national policies on global health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 69-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:552-:d:986120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.