IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i10p461-d937392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Seizing the Window of Strategic Opportunity’: A Study of China’s Macro–Strategic Narrative since the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Wenlong Song

    (School of International Relations, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024, China)

Abstract

Since the turn of the 21st century, China has leveraged the international environment in its favour to achieve a spectacularly rapid rise, a success that Chinese strategic policymakers attribute in part to ‘seizing the strategic window of opportunity’. How has China perceived the international environment and shaped the narrative of its macro-strategy? What impact has it had on China and the world? The article explores the evolution of the strategic narrative of the ‘window of opportunity’ in three stages since the 21st century and explores its impact in terms of quantity and keyword mapping by analysing the narrative texts of China’s ‘discourse coalition’ (government, official media and intellectual elites). The study found that China’s macro-strategic narrative is primarily driven by the official political and semi-official intellectual elites and places a premium on domestic political persuasion rather than external displays of strategic intent. It combines classical and modern philosophical thinking and methodology with the two core objectives of ‘maintaining peace’ and an ‘economic priority’. Over 20 years, the trend of narrative production of the ‘strategic opportunity period’ has shown a concentrated emergence and fluctuating decline, and its narrative elements have been enriched, interlinked and aligned with the narrative of the CPC’s core policies. The narrative of the ‘strategic opportunity period’ has been a powerful force in building domestic legitimacy, guaranteeing partial fulfilment of strategic objectives and offering lessons for other countries to learn from. Inevitably, the narrative faces a number of dilemmas and challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenlong Song, 2022. "‘Seizing the Window of Strategic Opportunity’: A Study of China’s Macro–Strategic Narrative since the 21st Century," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:461-:d:937392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nye, Joseph S., 2014. "The Information Revolution and Soft Power," Scholarly Articles 11738398, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Jinghan Zeng, 2017. "Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of ‘One Belt One Road’ and ‘New Type of Great Power Relations’," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1162-1176, September.
    3. Vivian Louie & Anahí Viladrich, 2021. "“Divide, Divert, & Conquer” Deconstructing the Presidential Framing of White Supremacy in the COVID-19 Era," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hai Yang, 2018. "Time to up the game? Middle Eastern security and Chinese strategic involvement," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 283-296, September.
    2. Pablo López-Rabadán, 2021. "Framing Studies Evolution in the Social Media Era. Digital Advancement and Reorientation of the Research Agenda," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Hai Jin & Orestis Schinas, 2019. "Ownership of Assets in Chinese Shipping Funds," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    5. Juyan Zhang, 2020. "Compassion versus manipulation; narratives versus rational arguments: a PD radar to chart the terrain of public diplomacy," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 195-211, September.
    6. Serafettin Yilmaz (Yao Shifan) & Liu Changming, 2020. "Remaking Eurasia: the Belt and Road Initiative and China-Russia strategic partnership," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 259-280, September.
    7. Schulhof, Vera & van Vuuren, Detlef & Kirchherr, Julian, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): What Will it Look Like in the Future?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Kaho YU, 2018. "Energy cooperation in the Belt and Road Initiative: EU experience of the Trans-European Networks for Energy," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 251-265, September.
    9. Ong’ong’a Daniel Oloo, 2024. "The implementation of the digital diplomacy of the United States, the UK, and China in Kenya," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 180-191, June.
    10. Yu-Han Cai & Charalampos Efstathopoulos, 2023. "Between economic openness and strategic caution: Germany’s response to China’s investment," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 291-309, September.
    11. Vincent K. L. Chang & Frank N. Pieke, 2018. "Europe’s engagement with China: shifting Chinese views of the EU and the EU-China relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 317-331, December.
    12. Tiffany Joseph & Tanya Golash-Boza, 2021. "Double Consciousness in the 21st Century: Du Boisian Theory and the Problem of Racialized Legal Status," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Chuchu Zhang & Chaowei Xiao & Helin Liu, 2019. "Spatial Big Data Analysis of Political Risks along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Xiaohui Sun & Jianbo Gao & Bin Liu & Zhenzhen Wang, 2021. "Big Data-Based Assessment of Political Risk along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:461-:d:937392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.