IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v55y2017i5p1162-1176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of ‘One Belt One Road’ and ‘New Type of Great Power Relations’

Author

Listed:
  • Jinghan Zeng

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinghan Zeng, 2017. "Does Europe Matter? The Role of Europe in Chinese Narratives of ‘One Belt One Road’ and ‘New Type of Great Power Relations’," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1162-1176, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:55:y:2017:i:5:p:1162-1176
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12535
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Hill, 1993. "The Capability‐Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe's International Role," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 305-328, September.
    2. Zhimin Chen, 2016. "China, the European Union and the Fragile World Order," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 775-792, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Han Cai & Charalampos Efstathopoulos, 2023. "Between economic openness and strategic caution: Germany’s response to China’s investment," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 291-309, September.
    2. Hai Jin & Orestis Schinas, 2019. "Ownership of Assets in Chinese Shipping Funds," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Vincent K. L. Chang & Frank N. Pieke, 2018. "Europe’s engagement with China: shifting Chinese views of the EU and the EU-China relationship," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 317-331, December.
    4. Wenlong Song, 2022. "‘Seizing the Window of Strategic Opportunity’: A Study of China’s Macro–Strategic Narrative since the 21st Century," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    6. Schulhof, Vera & van Vuuren, Detlef & Kirchherr, Julian, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): What Will it Look Like in the Future?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Chuchu Zhang & Chaowei Xiao & Helin Liu, 2019. "Spatial Big Data Analysis of Political Risks along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Kaho YU, 2018. "Energy cooperation in the Belt and Road Initiative: EU experience of the Trans-European Networks for Energy," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 251-265, September.
    9. Serafettin Yilmaz (Yao Shifan) & Liu Changming, 2020. "Remaking Eurasia: the Belt and Road Initiative and China-Russia strategic partnership," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 259-280, September.
    10. Xiaohui Sun & Jianbo Gao & Bin Liu & Zhenzhen Wang, 2021. "Big Data-Based Assessment of Political Risk along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Hai Yang, 2018. "Time to up the game? Middle Eastern security and Chinese strategic involvement," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 283-296, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    2. Anatolie CARBUNE, 2019. "Societal Resilience And The Role Of Eu’S Actorness In The Eastern Neighbourhood," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 21, pages 249-254, December.
    3. Kristen Jones, 2024. "Colombia's role in great power competition," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S3), pages 120-129, June.
    4. Meike Froitzheim & Fredrik Söderbaum & Ian Taylor, 2011. "The Limits of the EU as a Peace and Security Actor in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 46(3), pages 45-70.
    5. Niall Duggan & Obert Hodzi, 2021. "The challenges of China-European Union security cooperation in Africa," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 43-57, March.
    6. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Christian B. Jensen & Jonathan Slapin & Thomas König, 2007. "Who Calls for a Common EU Foreign Policy?," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 387-410, September.
    8. George ANGLIŢOIU, 2014. "The Eu Intelligence Service Dilemma," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 8(2), pages 179-203.
    9. Anand Menon, 2011. "Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 83-100, January.
    10. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    11. Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Daniela Schwarzer, 2017. "Europe, the End of the West and Global Power Shifts," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 18-26, June.
    12. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    13. Chiara De Franco & Christoph O. Meyer & Karen E. Smith, 2015. "‘Living by Example?’ The European Union and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 994-1009, September.
    14. Sattich, Thomas & Freeman, Duncan & Scholten, Daniel & Yan, Shaohua, 2021. "Renewable energy in EU-China relations: Policy interdependence and its geopolitical implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Helena Carrapico & André Barrinha, 2017. "The EU as a Coherent (Cyber)Security Actor?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1254-1272, November.
    16. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross, 2017. "The EU's Power in the Russia–Ukraine Crisis: Enabled or Constrained?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 137-152, January.
    17. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Kaija Schilde, 2017. "European Military Capabilities: Enablers and Constraints on EU Power?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 37-53, January.
    18. Michael Smith, 2019. "The European Union and the Global Arena: In Search of Post-Brexit Roles," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 83-92.
    19. Erickson, Jennifer L., 2008. "Normative power and EU arms transfer policy: A theoretical critique and empirical test [Normative Macht und die EU-Waffenlieferungspolitik: Eine theoretische Kritik und ein empirischer Test]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. James Rogers, 2009. "From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union's ‘Grand Strategy’ Through the Articulation of Discourse Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 831-862, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:55:y:2017:i:5:p:1162-1176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.