IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i7p265-d591538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Begoña Martínez-González

    (Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera

    (Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque

    (Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro

    (Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez

    (Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Yamile Turizo-Palencia

    (Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain
    Grupo de Investigación en Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze gender, anxiety, and psychological inflexibility differences of high school students’ behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Method: A total of 1147 volunteer adolescents participated, (Men: N = 479; Mage = 16.3; Women: N = 668; Mage = 16.2). The participants saw 15 s animated online video presenting peer coercion into an academic cheating situation, including a questionnaire about their reactions to face the situation. They also answered the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for children and adolescents and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Gender was associated with the behaviors facing the situation. Higher state anxiety and inflexibility were present in those participants that avoided aggressive behaviors facing the situation; on the other hand, trait anxiety was present in those who reacted aggressively. Finally, higher anxiety and inflexibility were associated with the used moral disengagement mechanisms, but also with peers’ perception as sanctioning or being against the participants’ decision. The most aggressive students were more flexible and less stressed than those who tried to solve assertively. Expectations about peers seem to be relevant to the decision-making facing moral dilemmas and peer victimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Begoña Martínez-González & Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera & Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque & Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro & Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez & Yamile Turizo-Palencia & Vicente Javier Cleme, 2021. "Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:265-:d:591538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcelo de C. Griebeler, 2019. "“But everybody’s doing it!”: a model of peer effects on student cheating," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 259-281, March.
    2. Saar Bossuyt & Patrick Kenhove, 2018. "Assertiveness Bias in Gender Ethics Research: Why Women Deserve the Benefit of the Doubt," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 727-739, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Ramírez-Adrados & Valentín E. Fernández-Elías & Silvia Fernández-Martínez & Beatriz Martínez-Pascual & Cristina Gonzalez-de-Ramos & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2022. "The Effect of Studying a Double Degree in the Psychophysiological Stress Response in the Bachelor’s Thesis Defense," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Andrés Concha-Salgado & Angélica Ramírez & Beatriz Pérez & Ricardo Pérez-Luco & Eduardo García-Cueto, 2022. "Moral Disengagement as a Self-Regulatory Cognitive Process of Transgressions: Psychometric Evidence of the Bandura Scale in Chilean Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Alvaro Bustamante-Sanchez & Bella Esperanza Villegas-Mora & Ismael Martínez-Guardado & Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera & Luca Paolo Ardigò & Hadi Nobari & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2022. "Physical Activity and Nutritional Pattern Related to Maturation and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George R. G. Clarke, 2021. "How Do Women Managers Avoid Paying Bribes?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:265-:d:591538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.