IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i7p125-d587197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Combined Stop-Loss and Quota-Share Reinsurance: Conditional Tail Expectation-Based Optimization from the Joint Perspective of Insurer and Reinsurer

Author

Listed:
  • Khreshna Syuhada

    (Statistics Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Arief Hakim

    (Statistics Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

  • Suci Sari

    (Statistics Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia)

Abstract

In the presence of reinsurance, an insurer may effectively reduce its (aggregated) loss by partially ceding such a loss to a reinsurer. Stop-loss and quota-share reinsurance contracts are commonly agreed between these two parties. In this paper, we aim to explore a combination of these contracts. The survival functions of the ceded loss and the retained loss are firstly investigated. Optimizing such a reinsurance design is then carried out from the joint perspective of the insurer and the reinsurer. Specifically, we explicitly derive optimal retentions under a criterion of minimizing a convex combination of conditional tail expectations of the insurer’s total loss and the reinsurer’s total loss. In addition, an estimation procedure and more explanations on numerical examples are also presented to find their estimated values.

Suggested Citation

  • Khreshna Syuhada & Arief Hakim & Suci Sari, 2021. "The Combined Stop-Loss and Quota-Share Reinsurance: Conditional Tail Expectation-Based Optimization from the Joint Perspective of Insurer and Reinsurer," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:7:p:125-:d:587197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/125/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/125/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Jun & Lemieux, Christiane & Liu, Fangda, 2016. "Optimal Reinsurance From The Perspectives Of Both An Insurer And A Reinsurer," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 815-849, September.
    2. Lo, Ambrose, 2017. "A Neyman-Pearson Perspective On Optimal Reinsurance With Constraints," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 467-499, May.
    3. Lu, ZhiYi & Meng, LiLi & Wang, Yujin & Shen, Qingjie, 2016. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and TVaR risk measures in the presence of reinsurer’s risk limit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 92-100.
    4. Chen, Yanhong, 2021. "Optimal Reinsurance From The Viewpoints Of Both An Insurer And A Reinsurer Under The Cvar Risk Measure And Vajda Condition," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 631-659, May.
    5. Ying Fang & Xia Wang & Hongli Liu & Tong Li, 2019. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance for both the insurer and the reinsurer with general premium principles," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(24), pages 6134-6154, December.
    6. Zhi-Yi Lu & Le-Ping Liu & Qing-Jie Shen & Li-Li Meng, 2014. "Optimal Reinsurance Under VaR and CTE Risk Measures When Ceded Loss Function is Concave," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(15), pages 3223-3247, August.
    7. Ken Tan & Chengguo Weng & Yi Zhang, 2009. "VAR and CTE Criteria for Optimal Quota-Share and Stop-Loss Reinsurance," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 459-482.
    8. Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek A. Teuerle & Aleksandra Wilkowska, 2021. "Ruin Probability for the Insurer–Reinsurer Model for Exponential Claims: A Probabilistic Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Jiang, Wenjun & Hong, Hanping & Ren, Jiandong, 2021. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies with maximal synergy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 185-198.
    10. Junhong Du & Zhiming Li & Lijun Wu, 2019. "Optimal Stop-Loss Reinsurance Under the VaR and CTE Risk Measures: Variable Transformation Method," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1133-1151, March.
    11. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2008. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 185-196, August.
    12. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2007. "Optimal Retention for a Stop-loss Reinsurance Under the VaR and CTE Risk Measures," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 93-112, May.
    13. Wenjun Jiang & Jiandong Ren & Ričardas Zitikis, 2017. "Optimal Reinsurance Policies under the VaR Risk Measure When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer Are Taken into Account," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Marek Kaluszka, 2004. "Mean-Variance Optimal Reinsurance Arrangements," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2004(1), pages 28-41.
    15. Chi, Yichun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2011. "Optimal Reinsurance under VaR and CVaR Risk Measures: a Simplified Approach," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 487-509, November.
    16. Ambrose Lo & Zhaofeng Tang, 2019. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies in the presence of individual risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 395-423, March.
    17. Jun Cai & Ying Fang & Zhi Li & Gordon E. Willmot, 2013. "Optimal Reciprocal Reinsurance Treaties Under the Joint Survival Probability and the Joint Profitable Probability," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 80(1), pages 145-168, March.
    18. Cai, Jun & Liu, Haiyan & Wang, Ruodu, 2017. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance arrangements under general model settings," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 24-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ambrose Lo & Zhaofeng Tang, 2019. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies in the presence of individual risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 395-423, March.
    2. Cheung, Ka Chun & He, Wanting & Wang, He, 2023. "Multi-constrained optimal reinsurance model from the duality perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 199-214.
    3. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "A marginal indemnity function approach to optimal reinsurance under the Vajda condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 928-944.
    4. Wenjun Jiang & Jiandong Ren & Ričardas Zitikis, 2017. "Optimal Reinsurance Policies under the VaR Risk Measure When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer Are Taken into Account," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Mi Chen & Wenyuan Wang & Ruixing Ming, 2016. "Optimal Reinsurance Under General Law-Invariant Convex Risk Measure and TVaR Premium Principle," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Jiang, Wenjun & Hong, Hanping & Ren, Jiandong, 2021. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies with maximal synergy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 185-198.
    7. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Cheung, Ka Chun & Chong, Wing Fung & Hu, Junlei, 2020. "Pareto-optimal insurance contracts with premium budget and minimum charge constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 17-27.
    8. Cai, Jun & Liu, Haiyan & Wang, Ruodu, 2017. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance arrangements under general model settings," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 24-37.
    9. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Cani, Arian, 2019. "On randomized reinsurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 67-78.
    10. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Chi, Yichun & Hu, Junlei, 2015. "Optimal non-life reinsurance under Solvency II Regime," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 227-237.
    11. Cui, Wei & Yang, Jingping & Wu, Lan, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance minimizing the distortion risk measure under general reinsurance premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 74-85.
    12. Hu, Xiang & Yang, Hailiang & Zhang, Lianzeng, 2015. "Optimal retention for a stop-loss reinsurance with incomplete information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 15-21.
    13. Chi, Yichun & Liu, Fangda, 2021. "Enhancing an insurer's expected value by reinsurance and external financing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 466-484.
    14. Chi, Yichun & Weng, Chengguo, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance subject to Vajda condition," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 179-189.
    15. Zhu, Yunzhou & Chi, Yichun & Weng, Chengguo, 2014. "Multivariate reinsurance designs for minimizing an insurer’s capital requirement," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 144-155.
    16. Chi, Yichun, 2012. "Optimal reinsurance under variance related premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 310-321.
    17. Chi, Yichun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance with general premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 180-189.
    18. Cheung, Ka Chun & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip & Zhang, Yiying, 2019. "Risk-adjusted Bowley reinsurance under distorted probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 64-72.
    19. Mario Brandtner, 2016. "Spektrale Risikomaße: Konzeption, betriebswirtschaftliche Anwendungen und Fallstricke," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 75-115, April.
    20. Wang, Qiuqi & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2022. "Risk measures induced by efficient insurance contracts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 56-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:7:p:125-:d:587197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.