IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v4y2016i2p10-d67819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Telematics and Gender Discrimination: Some Usage-Based Evidence on Whether Men’s Risk of Accidents Differs from Women’s

Author

Listed:
  • Mercedes Ayuso

    (Riskcenter, Universidad de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 690, Barcelona 08034, Spain)

  • Montserrat Guillen

    (Riskcenter, Universidad de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 690, Barcelona 08034, Spain)

  • Ana María Pérez-Marín

    (Riskcenter, Universidad de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 690, Barcelona 08034, Spain)

Abstract

Pay-as-you-drive ( PAYD ), or usage-based automobile insurance (UBI), is a policy agreement tied to vehicle usage. In this paper we analyze the effect of the distance traveled on the risk of accidents among young drivers with a PAYD policy. We use regression models for survival data to estimate how long it takes them to have their first accident at fault during the coverage period. Our empirical application with real data is presented and shows that gender differences are mainly attributable to the intensity of use. Indeed, although gender has a significant effect in explaining the time to the first crash, this effect is no longer significant when the average distance traveled per day is introduced in the model. This suggests that gender differences in the risk of accidents are, to a large extent, attributable to the fact that men drive more often than women. Estimates of the time to the first accident for different driver risk types are presented. We conclude that no gender discrimination is necessary if telematics provides enough information on driving habits.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercedes Ayuso & Montserrat Guillen & Ana María Pérez-Marín, 2016. "Telematics and Gender Discrimination: Some Usage-Based Evidence on Whether Men’s Risk of Accidents Differs from Women’s," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:10-:d:67819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/4/2/10/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/4/2/10/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khazzoom, J. Daniel, 2000. "Pay-At-The-Pump Auto Insurance," Discussion Papers 10906, Resources for the Future.
    2. Khazzoom, J. Daniel, 2000. "Pay-At-The-Pump (PATP) Auto Insurance: Criticisms and Proposed Modifications," Discussion Papers 10811, Resources for the Future.
    3. Vijay Aseervatham & Christoph Lex & Spindler, Martin, 2014. "How do unisex rating regulations affect gender differences in insurance premiums?," MEA discussion paper series 201416, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    4. Hultkrantz, Lars & Nilsson, Jan-Eric & Arvidsson, Sara, 2012. "Voluntary internalization of speeding externalities with vehicle insurance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 926-937.
    5. Vijay Aseervatham & Christoph Lex & Martin Spindler, 2016. "How Do Unisex Rating Regulations Affect Gender Differences in Insurance Premiums?," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 41(1), pages 128-160, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montserrat Guillen & Ana M. Pérez-Marín & Mercedes Ayuso & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2018. "“Exposure to risk increases the excess of zero accident claims frequency in automobile insurance”," IREA Working Papers 201810, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised May 2018.
    2. Guillen, Montserrat & Bermúdez, Lluís & Pitarque, Albert, 2021. "Joint generalized quantile and conditional tail expectation regression for insurance risk analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-8.
    3. David A. Cather, 2020. "Reconsidering insurance discrimination and adverse selection in an era of data analytics," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 426-456, July.
    4. Francis Duval & Jean‐Philippe Boucher & Mathieu Pigeon, 2023. "Enhancing claim classification with feature extraction from anomaly‐detection‐derived routine and peculiarity profiles," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 421-458, June.
    5. Denuit, Michel & Guillen, Montserrat & Trufin, Julien, 2018. "Multivariate credibility modeling for usage-based motor insurance pricing with behavioral data," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2018032, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Gao, Guangyuan & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Yang, Hanfang, 2019. "Evaluation of driving risk at different speeds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 108-119.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bian, Yiyang & Yang, Chen & Zhao, J. Leon & Liang, Liang, 2018. "Good drivers pay less: A study of usage-based vehicle insurance models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 20-34.
    2. Shan Huang & Martin Salm, 2020. "The effect of a ban on gender‐based pricing on risk selection in the German health insurance market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 3-17, January.
    3. Mercedes Ayuso & Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2019. "Improving automobile insurance ratemaking using telematics: incorporating mileage and driver behaviour data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 735-752, June.
    4. Huang, Shan & Salm, Martin, 2020. "The effect of a ban on gender-based pricing on risk selection in the German health insurance market," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 3-17.
    5. David A. Cather, 2020. "Reconsidering insurance discrimination and adverse selection in an era of data analytics," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 426-456, July.
    6. Luigi Buzzacchi & Tommaso M. Valletti, 2005. "Strategic Price Discrimination in Compulsory Insurance Markets," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 30(1), pages 71-97, June.
    7. Dementyeva, Maria & Koster, Paul R. & Verhoef, Erik T., 2015. "Regulation of road accident externalities when insurance companies have market power," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-8.
    8. An Chen & Montserrat Guillen & Elena Vigna, 2017. "Solvency requirement in a unisex mortality model," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 504, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    9. Dementyeva, Maria & Verhoef, Erik T., 2016. "Miles, speed, and technology: Traffic safety under oligopolistic insurance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 147-162.
    10. Mohamed Hanafy & Ruixing Ming, 2021. "Machine Learning Approaches for Auto Insurance Big Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Donatella Porrini & Giulio Fusco & Cosimo Magazzino, 2020. "Black boxes and market efficiency: the effect on premiums in the Italian motor-vehicle insurance market," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 455-472, June.
    12. Hsu, Yung-Ching & Shiu, Yung-Ming & Chou, Pai-Lung & Chen, Yen-Ming J., 2015. "Vehicle insurance and the risk of road traffic accidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 201-209.
    13. Jessica Pesantez-Narvaez & Montserrat Guillen & Manuela Alcañiz, 2019. "Predicting Motor Insurance Claims Using Telematics Data—XGBoost versus Logistic Regression," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:10-:d:67819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.