IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2024i1p4-d1557273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Benefit Distribution of a Tontine-like Annuity Fund with Age-Structured Models

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Zhang

    (Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ping Chen

    (Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Xueyuan Wu

    (Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

This paper introduces a tontine-like annuity fund designed to provide lifelong income to its participants. Initially, each member contributes a lump-sum payment into a trust fund as a joining premium. Participants then receive benefits over time, based on their survival. As members pass away, their share of payouts is redistributed among the survivors, resulting in increased payouts for those remaining. Differing from traditional tontines, which assume a uniform mortality risk, this fund accommodates participants of various ages and allows new members to join during its operation. To accommodate these features, the authors utilize age-structured models (ASMs) to determine fair premiums for new entrants and to analyze the dynamics of benefit distribution. The core objective of this paper is to develop a pension model using ASMs, recognizing its significant potential for adaptation and expansion. The primary mathematical approach employed is the Maximum Principle from optimal control theory, which helps in deriving explicit solutions for the optimal subsidy strategy. Through numerical examples and detailed illustrations, the paper demonstrates that participants who remain in the cohort longer receive greater subsidies. Additionally, the study finds that adverse shocks lead to a smaller population and thus fewer subsidies. Conversely, starting with a larger initial cohort population tends to increase the overall population, resulting in more subsidies. However, higher costs associated with subsidies lead to their reduction. Our analysis reveals the complex interplay of factors influencing the sustainability and effectiveness of the proposed annuity model.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Zhang & Ping Chen & Xueyuan Wu, 2024. "Optimal Benefit Distribution of a Tontine-like Annuity Fund with Age-Structured Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:4-:d:1557273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milevsky, Moshe A. & Salisbury, Thomas S., 2015. "Optimal retirement income tontines," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 91-105.
    2. Bernhardt, Thomas & Donnelly, Catherine, 2019. "Modern tontine with bequest: Innovation in pooled annuity products," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 168-188.
    3. Yijia Lin & Samuel H. Cox, 2005. "Securitization of Mortality Risks in Life Annuities," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 227-252, June.
    4. Thomas Bernhardt & Catherine Donnelly, 2019. "Modern tontine with bequest: innovation in pooled annuity products," Papers 1903.05990, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2021. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2019-20 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 395-439.
    2. Chen, An & Guillen, Montserrat & Rach, Manuel, 2021. "Fees in tontines," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 89-106.
    3. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Rach, Manuel, 2021. "Optimal retirement products under subjective mortality beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 55-69.
    4. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Bégin, Jean-François & Sanders, Barbara, 2024. "Benefit volatility-targeting strategies in lifetime pension pools," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 72-94.
    6. Dagpunar, John, 2021. "Closed-form solutions for an explicit modern ideal tontine with bequest motive," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 261-273.
    7. Hieber, Peter & Lucas, Nathalie, 2020. "Life-Care Tontines," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2020026, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. Xie, Lin & Chen, Lv & Qian, Linyi & Li, Danping & Yang, Zhixin, 2023. "Optimal investment and consumption strategies for pooled annuity with partial information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 129-155.
    9. Chen, An & Rach, Manuel, 2023. "Actuarial fairness and social welfare in mixed-cohort tontines," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 214-229.
    10. Blake, David & El Karoui, Nicole & Loisel, Stéphane & MacMinn, Richard, 2018. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2015–16 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 157-173.
    11. John Dagpunar, 2020. "Closed-form Solutions for an Explicit Modern Ideal Tontine with Bequest Motive," Papers 2005.00715, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    12. Gerrard, Russell & Hiabu, Munir & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vodička, Peter, 2020. "Long-term real dynamic investment planning," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 90-103.
    13. Jan L. M. Dhaene & Moshe A. Milevsky, 2024. "Egalitarian pooling and sharing of longevity risk', a.k.a. 'The many ways to skin a tontine cat," Papers 2402.00855, arXiv.org.
    14. Fahrenwaldt, Matthias A. & Sun, Chaofan, 2020. "Expected utility approximation and portfolio optimisation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 301-314.
    15. Bäuerle Nicole & Chen An, 2019. "Optimal retirement planning under partial information," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 36(1-4), pages 37-55, December.
    16. Thomas Bernhardt, 2025. "A note on bequest preferences in utility maximisation for modern tontines," Papers 2501.08972, arXiv.org.
    17. Chen, An & Rach, Manuel, 2019. "Options on tontines: An innovative way of combining tontines and annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 182-192.
    18. An Chen & Montserrat Guillen & Elena Vigna, 2017. "Solvency requirement in a unisex mortality model," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 504, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    19. Moshe A. Milevsky & Thomas S. Salisbury, 2024. "The Riccati Tontine: How to Satisfy Regulators on Average," Papers 2402.14555, arXiv.org.
    20. Lin He & Zongxia Liang & Sheng Wang, 2022. "Modern Tontine with Transaction Costs," Papers 2209.09709, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:4-:d:1557273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.