IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i10p152-d1485645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contrast-Tree-Based Approach to Two-Population Models

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Lizzi

    (Centre for Insurance Research “Ermanno Pitacco”, MIB Trieste School of Management, Largo Caduti di Nasiriya 1, 34142 Trieste, Italy)

Abstract

Building small-population mortality tables has great practical importance in actuarial applications. In recent years, several works in the literature have explored different methodologies to quantify and assess longevity and mortality risk, especially within the context of small populations, and many models dealing with this problem usually use a two-population approach, modeling a mortality spread between a larger reference population and the population of interest, via likelihood-based techniques. To broaden the tools at actuaries’ disposal to build small-population mortality tables, a general structure for a two-step two-population model is proposed, its main element of novelty residing in a machine-learning-based approach to mortality spread estimation. In order to obtain this, Contrast Trees and the related Estimation Contrast Boosting techniques have been applied. A quite general machine-learning-based model has then been adapted in order to generalize Italian actuarial practice in company tables estimation and implemented using data from the Human Mortality Database. Finally, results from the ML-based model have been compared to those obtained from the traditional model.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Lizzi, 2024. "A Contrast-Tree-Based Approach to Two-Population Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:152-:d:1485645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/10/152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/10/152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarner, Søren F. & Jallbjørn, Snorre, 2022. "The Saint Model: A Decade Later," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 483-517, May.
    2. Jarner, Søren Fiig & Kryger, Esben Masotti, 2011. "Modelling Adult Mortality in Small Populations: The Saint Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 377-418, November.
    3. Villegas, Andrés M. & Haberman, Steven & Kaishev, Vladimir K. & Millossovich, Pietro, 2017. "A Comparative Study Of Two-Population Models For The Assessment Of Basis Risk In Longevity Hedges," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 631-679, September.
    4. Maria Russolillo & Giuseppe Giordano & Steven Haberman, 2011. "Extending the Lee–Carter model: a three-way decomposition," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2011(2), pages 96-117.
    5. Andrew J. G. Cairns & David Blake & Kevin Dowd, 2006. "A Two‐Factor Model for Stochastic Mortality with Parameter Uncertainty: Theory and Calibration," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 687-718, December.
    6. Li, Johnny Siu-Hang & Zhou, Rui & Hardy, Mary, 2015. "A step-by-step guide to building two-population stochastic mortality models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 121-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selin Özen & Şule Şahin, 2021. "A Two-Population Mortality Model to Assess Longevity Basis Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2021. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2019-20 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 395-439.
    3. Farid Flici & Frédéric Planchet, 2019. "Experience Prospective Life-Tables for the Algerian Retirees," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Selin Ozen & c{S}ule c{S}ahin, 2021. "A Two-Population Mortality Model to Assess Longevity Basis Risk," Papers 2101.06690, arXiv.org.
    5. Blake, David & El Karoui, Nicole & Loisel, Stéphane & MacMinn, Richard, 2018. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2015–16 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 157-173.
    6. Bravo, Jorge M. & Ayuso, Mercedes & Holzmann, Robert & Palmer, Edward, 2021. "Addressing the life expectancy gap in pension policy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 200-221.
    7. Massimiliano Menzietti & Maria Francesca Morabito & Manuela Stranges, 2019. "Mortality Projections for Small Populations: An Application to the Maltese Elderly," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Andrew J.G. Cairns & Malene Kallestrup-Lamb & Carsten P.T. Rosenskjold & David Blake & Kevin Dowd, 2016. "Modelling Socio-Economic Differences in the Mortality of Danish Males Using a New Affluence Index," CREATES Research Papers 2016-14, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    9. Shang, Han Lin & Haberman, Steven & Xu, Ruofan, 2022. "Multi-population modelling and forecasting life-table death counts," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 239-253.
    10. Katrien Antonio & Anastasios Bardoutsos & Wilbert Ouburg, 2015. "Bayesian Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality projections with multiple populations," Working Papers Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven 485564, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Leuven.
    11. Kallestrup-Lamb, Malene & Søgaard Laursen, Nicolai, 2024. "Longevity hedge effectiveness using socioeconomic indices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 242-251.
    12. Chen, Hua & MacMinn, Richard & Sun, Tao, 2015. "Multi-population mortality models: A factor copula approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 135-146.
    13. Basellini, Ugofilippo & Camarda, Carlo Giovanni & Booth, Heather, 2023. "Thirty years on: A review of the Lee–Carter method for forecasting mortality," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1033-1049.
    14. Wang, Hsin-Chung & Yue, Ching-Syang Jack & Chong, Chen-Tai, 2018. "Mortality models and longevity risk for small populations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 351-359.
    15. de Jong, Piet & Tickle, Leonie & Xu, Jianhui, 2016. "Coherent modeling of male and female mortality using Lee–Carter in a complex number framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 130-137.
    16. Ayuso, Mercedes & Bravo, Jorge M. & Holzmann, Robert, 2021. "Getting life expectancy estimates right for pension policy: period versus cohort approach," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 212-231, April.
    17. Liu, Yanxin & Li, Johnny Siu-Hang, 2016. "It’s all in the hidden states: A longevity hedging strategy with an explicit measure of population basis risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 301-319.
    18. Bozikas, Apostolos & Pitselis, Georgios, 2020. "Incorporating crossed classification credibility into the Lee–Carter model for multi-population mortality data," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 353-368.
    19. Jaap Spreeuw & Iqbal Owadally & Muhammad Kashif, 2022. "Projecting Mortality Rates Using a Markov Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Simon Schnürch & Torsten Kleinow & Ralf Korn, 2021. "Clustering-Based Extensions of the Common Age Effect Multi-Population Mortality Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-32, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:152-:d:1485645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.