IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i7p131-d843949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extensions on the Hatzopoulos–Sagianou Multiple-Components Stochastic Mortality Model

Author

Listed:
  • Aliki Sagianou

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial-Financial Mathematics, University of the Aegean, 83200 Samos, Greece)

  • Peter Hatzopoulos

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial-Financial Mathematics, University of the Aegean, 83200 Samos, Greece)

Abstract

In this paper, we present extensions of the Hatzopoulos–Sagianou (2020) (HS) multiple-component stochastic mortality model. Our aim is to thoroughly evaluate and stress test the HS model by deploying various link functions, using generalised linear models, and diverse distributions in the model’s estimation method. In this work, we differentiate the HS approach by modelling the number of deaths using the Binomial model commonly employed in the literature of mortality modelling. Given this, new HS extensions are derived using the off-the-shelf link functions, namely the complementary log–log, logit and probit, while we also reform the model by introducing a new form of link functions with a particular focus on the use of heavy-tailed distributions. The above-mentioned enhancements conclude to a new methodology for the HS model, and we prove that it is more suitable than those used in the literature to model the mortality dynamics. In this regard, our work offers an extensive experimental testbed to scrutinise the efficiency, explainability and capacity of the HS model extensions using both the off-the-shelf and the newly introduced form of link functions over datasets with different characteristics. The introduced HS extensions bring an improvement by approximately 16% to the model’s goodness-of-fit, while they uncover more fine-grained age clusters. In addition, we compare the performance of the HS extensions against other well-known mortality models, both under fitting and forecast modes. The results reflect the advantageous features of the HS extensions to deliver a highly informative structure and enable the attribution of an identified mortality trend to a unique age cluster. The above-mentioned improvements enable mortality analysts to perform an in-depth and more detailed investigation of mortality trends for specific age clusters and can contribute to the attempts of academia and industry to tackle the uncertainties and risks introduced by the increasing life expectancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliki Sagianou & Peter Hatzopoulos, 2022. "Extensions on the Hatzopoulos–Sagianou Multiple-Components Stochastic Mortality Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:7:p:131-:d:843949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/7/131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/7/131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Booth, H. & Tickle, L., 2008. "Mortality Modelling and Forecasting: a Review of Methods," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1-2), pages 3-43, September.
    2. Renshaw, A.E. & Haberman, S., 2006. "A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter model for mortality reduction factors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 556-570, June.
    3. Philippe Deprez & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2017. "Machine Learning Techniques for Mortality Modeling," Papers 1705.03396, arXiv.org.
    4. Carter, Lawrence R. & Lee, Ronald D., 1992. "Modeling and forecasting US sex differentials in mortality," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 393-411, November.
    5. Hunt, Andrew & Villegas, Andrés M., 2015. "Robustness and convergence in the Lee–Carter model with cohort effects," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 186-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basellini, Ugofilippo & Camarda, Carlo Giovanni & Booth, Heather, 2022. "Thirty years on: A review of the Lee-Carter method for forecasting mortality," SocArXiv 8u34d_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Bravo, Jorge M. & Ayuso, Mercedes & Holzmann, Robert & Palmer, Edward, 2021. "Addressing the life expectancy gap in pension policy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 200-221.
    3. Basellini, Ugofilippo & Camarda, Carlo Giovanni & Booth, Heather, 2023. "Thirty years on: A review of the Lee–Carter method for forecasting mortality," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1033-1049.
    4. Apostolos Bozikas & Georgios Pitselis, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Stochastic Mortality Modelling under the Age-Period-Cohort Framework: The Case of Greece with Applications to Insurance Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-34, April.
    5. Ufuk Beyaztas & Hanlin Shang, 2022. "Machine-Learning-Based Functional Time Series Forecasting: Application to Age-Specific Mortality Rates," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Guibert, Quentin & Lopez, Olivier & Piette, Pierrick, 2019. "Forecasting mortality rate improvements with a high-dimensional VAR," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 255-272.
    7. Basellini, Ugofilippo & Camarda, Carlo Giovanni & Booth, Heather, 2022. "Thirty years on: A review of the Lee-Carter method for forecasting mortality," SocArXiv 8u34d, Center for Open Science.
    8. Blake, David & Cairns, Andrew J.G., 2021. "Longevity risk and capital markets: The 2019-20 update," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 395-439.
    9. Marie-Pier Bergeron-Boucher & James E. Oeppen & Vladimir Canudas-Romo & James W. Vaupel, 2017. "Coherent forecasts of mortality with compositional data analysis," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(17), pages 527-566.
    10. Man Chung Fung & Gareth W. Peters & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2016. "A unified approach to mortality modelling using state-space framework: characterisation, identification, estimation and forecasting," Papers 1605.09484, arXiv.org.
    11. Jackie Li & Atsuyuki Kogure, 2021. "Bayesian Mixture Modelling for Mortality Projection," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    12. de Jong, Piet & Tickle, Leonie & Xu, Jianhui, 2016. "Coherent modeling of male and female mortality using Lee–Carter in a complex number framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 130-137.
    13. Colin O’hare & Youwei Li, 2017. "Modelling mortality: are we heading in the right direction?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 170-187, January.
    14. Colin O’hare & Youwei Li, 2017. "Models of mortality rates – analysing the residuals," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(52), pages 5309-5323, November.
    15. Doukhan, P. & Pommeret, D. & Rynkiewicz, J. & Salhi, Y., 2017. "A class of random field memory models for mortality forecasting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-110.
    16. Yassmin Ali & Ming Fang & Pablo A. Arrutia Sota & Stephen Taylor & Xun Wang, 2019. "Social Security Benefit Valuation, Risk, and Optimal Retirement," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-31, December.
    17. Massimiliano Menzietti & Maria Francesca Morabito & Manuela Stranges, 2019. "Mortality Projections for Small Populations: An Application to the Maltese Elderly," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Li, Hong & Lu, Yang, 2017. "Coherent Forecasting Of Mortality Rates: A Sparse Vector-Autoregression Approach," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 563-600, May.
    19. Carlo G. Camarda & Ugofilippo Basellini, 2021. "Smoothing, Decomposing and Forecasting Mortality Rates," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(3), pages 569-602, July.
    20. Han Lin Shang & Heather Booth & Rob Hyndman, 2011. "Point and interval forecasts of mortality rates and life expectancy: A comparison of ten principal component methods," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 25(5), pages 173-214.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:7:p:131-:d:843949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.