IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v13y2024i8p106-d1443411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Effects of Parameter Uncertainty on River Water Quality Predictions

Author

Listed:
  • André Fonseca

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Institute for Innovation, Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri-Food Production (Inov4Agro), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Cidália Botelho

    (LSRE—Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering—Associate Laboratory—LSRE/LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Rui A. R. Boaventura

    (LSRE—Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering—Associate Laboratory—LSRE/LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Vítor J. P. Vilar

    (LSRE—Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering—Associate Laboratory—LSRE/LCM, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Due to the high uncertainty of model predictions, it is often challenging to draw definitive conclusions when evaluating river water quality in the context of management options. The major aim of this study is to present a statistical evaluation of the Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF), which is a water quality modeling system, and how this modeling system can be used as a valuable tool to enhance monitoring planning and reduce uncertainty in water quality predictions. The authors’ findings regarding the sensitivity analysis of the HSPF model in relation to water quality predictions are presented. The application of the computer model was focused on the Ave River watershed in Portugal. Calibration of the hydrology was performed at two stations over five years, starting from January 1990 and ending in December 1994. Following the calibration, the hydrology model was then validated for another five-year period, from January 1995 to December 1999. A comprehensive evaluation framework is proposed, which includes a two-step statistical evaluation based on commonly used hydrology criteria for model calibration and validation. To thoroughly assess model uncertainty and parameter sensitivity, a Monte Carlo method uncertainty evaluation approach is integrated, along with multi-parametric sensitivity analyses. The Monte Carlo simulation considers the probability distributions of fourteen HSPF water quality parameters, which are used as input factors. The parameters that had the greatest impact on the simulated in-stream fecal coliform concentrations were those that represented the first-order decay rate and the surface runoff mechanism, which effectively removed 90 percent of the fecal coliform from the pervious land surface. These parameters had a more significant influence compared to the accumulation and maximum storage rates. When it comes to the oxygen governing process, the parameters that showed the highest sensitivity were benthal oxygen demand and nitrification/denitrification rate. The insights that can be derived from this study play a critical role in the development of robust water management strategies, and their significance lies in their potential to contribute to the advancement of predictive models in the field of water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • André Fonseca & Cidália Botelho & Rui A. R. Boaventura & Vítor J. P. Vilar, 2024. "Evaluating the Effects of Parameter Uncertainty on River Water Quality Predictions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:106-:d:1443411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/8/106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/13/8/106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagenschein, Dierk & Rode, Michael, 2008. "Modelling the impact of river morphology on nitrogen retention—A case study of the Weisse Elster River (Germany)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 224-232.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramesh P. Rudra & Balew A. Mekonnen & Rituraj Shukla & Narayan Kumar Shrestha & Pradeep K. Goel & Prasad Daggupati & Asim Biswas, 2020. "Currents Status, Challenges, and Future Directions in Identifying Critical Source Areas for Non-Point Source Pollution in Canadian Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Md Jahangir Alam & Dushmanta Dutta, 2016. "A Sub-Catchment Based Approach for Modelling Nutrient Dynamics and Transport at a River Basin Scale," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(14), pages 5455-5478, November.
    3. Bernd Klauer & Michael Rode & Johannes Schiller & Uwe Franko & Melanie Mewes, 2012. "Decision Support for the Selection of Measures according to the Requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(3), pages 775-798, February.
    4. H. Boyacioglu & T. Vetter & V. Krysanova & M. Rode, 2012. "Modeling the impacts of climate change on nitrogen retention in a 4th order stream," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 981-999, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:13:y:2024:i:8:p:106-:d:1443411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.