IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v9y2021i2p17-d543187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational Landscape of Virtual Reality in Higher Education: Bibliometric Evidences of Publishing Patterns and Emerging Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Shaista Rashid

    (University Level (UL) Department, College of Humanities, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Amira Khattak

    (Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Murtaza Ashiq

    (Library and Information Science, Islamabad Model College for Boys, H-9 Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
    Institute of Information Management, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan)

  • Shafiq Ur Rehman

    (Deanship of Library Affairs, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Rashid Rasool

    (Lundquist Center for Entrepreneurship, Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA)

Abstract

This bibliometric study examines the overall research trends and productivity in the field of virtual reality (VR) in higher education. Bibliometric data were retrieved from Scopus databases. The findings suggest a rising trend in terms of citations and publications showing increased interest in the VR domain have been seen during the last few decades. The year in which the most citations of this type occurred was 2009, in which 1913 citations were recorded, whereas 2019 was the most productive year, as 127 documents on this subject were published in that year. The data analysis revealed that all the top ten researchers belong to Australia. Further, the top three researchers (Gregory S., Lee, M.J.W., and Wood, D.), countries (United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia), organizations (Charles Sturt University, Queensland University of Technology, and University of New England, Australia), journals (Computers and Education, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, and Journal of Surgical Education) and collaborations (Australia and New Zealand, United States and the United Kingdom, and Australia and the United Kingdom) belong to developed countries. Virtual reality, virtual worlds, augmented reality, e-learning, and simulations are the top keywords used in the VR domain. The thematic evolution of the keyword shows the importance of “Virtual Reality” as a keyword throughout the 27 years of its existence (1994–2020). Furthermore, the main finding of the study is the interdisciplinary nature of the VR domain, which extends from the field of computer sciences to other disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaista Rashid & Amira Khattak & Murtaza Ashiq & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Muhammad Rashid Rasool, 2021. "Educational Landscape of Virtual Reality in Higher Education: Bibliometric Evidences of Publishing Patterns and Emerging Trends," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:17-:d:543187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/9/2/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/9/2/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Caselli & Wilbur John Coleman, 2001. "Cross-Country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(2), pages 328-335, May.
    2. S. Ravikumar & Ashutosh Agrahari & S. N. Singh, 2015. "Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 929-955, January.
    3. E. C. M. Noyons & H. F. Moed & A. F. J. Raan, 1999. "Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604, November.
    4. Farida Saleem & Amira Khattak & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Murtaza Ashiq, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Green Marketing Research from 1977 to 2020," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Sameer Kumar, 2018. "Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-Authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Henry Small, 1999. "Visualizing science by citation mapping," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(9), pages 799-813.
    7. Damla Karagozlu, 2018. "Determination of the impact of augmented reality application on the success and problem-solving skills of students," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2393-2402, September.
    8. Liangchao Xue & Christopher J. Parker & Helen McCormick, 2019. "A Virtual Reality and Retailing Literature Review: Current Focus, Underlying Themes and Future Directions," Progress in IS, in: M. Claudia tom Dieck & Timothy Jung (ed.), Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pages 27-41, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarin, Shikhar & Haon, Christophe & Belkhouja, Mustapha & Mas-Tur, Alicia & Roig-Tierno, Norat & Sego, Trina & Porter, Alan & Merigó, José M. & Carley, Stephen, 2020. "Uncovering the knowledge flows and intellectual structures of research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: A journey through history," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Irena Sajovic & Bojana Boh Podgornik, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Visualizations in Computer Graphics: A Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    3. Kameliya Deyanova & Nataliia Brehmer & Artur Lapidus & Victor Tiberius & Steve Walsh, 2022. "Hatching start-ups for sustainable growth: a bibliometric review on business incubators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2083-2109, October.
    4. Mathew Azarian & Hao Yu & Asmamaw Tadege Shiferaw & Tor Kristian Stevik, 2023. "Do We Perform Systematic Literature Review Right? A Scientific Mapping and Methodological Assessment," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-32, November.
    5. Andrea Moretta Tartaglione & Ylenia Cavacece & Giuseppe Russo & Giuseppe Granata, 2019. "A Systematic Mapping Study on Customer Loyalty and Brand Management," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Lamiaa Chab & Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2024. "Towards an Effective Risk Management in Durum Wheat Production: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Factors Influencing Quality and Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Cibele Oliveira Lima & Jarbas Bonetti, 2020. "Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on coastal communities’ social vulnerability to climate change and to the impact of extreme events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 1589-1610, July.
    8. Cristina Mele & Jaqueline Pels & Maria Spano & Irene Bernardo, 2023. "Emergent understandings of the market," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(1), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Pedro López-Rubio & Norat Roig-Tierno & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2020. "Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Yenchun Jim Wu & Mark Goh & Yingping Mai, 2023. "Social innovation and higher education: evolution and future promise," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Verma, Sanjeev & Yadav, Neha, 2021. "Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM)," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 111-128.
    12. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Ludovica Moi, 2021. "Disentangling the corporate entrepreneurship construct: conceptualizing through co-words," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2821-2863, April.
    13. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Luca Naitana, 2019. "What’s in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(2), pages 407-437, February.
    14. Cobo, M.J. & López-Herrera, A.G. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2011. "An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 146-166.
    15. E. M. Murgado-Armenteros & M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo & F. J. Torres-Ruiz & M. J. Cobo, 2015. "Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 519-557, January.
    16. Jan Wiers & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research 2009–2019," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 441-464, December.
    17. Zeng, Ying & Liu, Xinyi & Zhang, Xinyuan & Li, Zhiyong, 2024. "Retrospective of interdisciplinary research on robot services (1954–2023): From parasitism to symbiosis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    19. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    20. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:17-:d:543187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.