IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v6y2018i2p17-d141573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting Open Access at Kent—New Staff Roles

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalyn Bass

    (University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NS, UK)

  • Sarah Slowe

    (University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NS, UK)

Abstract

Open Access has been supported at the University of Kent from an early stage with the establishment of the Kent Academic Repository in 2007. Initially, this work was accommodated within the existing library staff structure, but the pace of change, funder requirements, and a new university plan meant that support for Open Access needed to become explicit. Therefore, a research support team was established using a matrix working system 1 . This article details this new structure and reflects on the benefits and challenges it brings.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalyn Bass & Sarah Slowe, 2018. "Supporting Open Access at Kent—New Staff Roles," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:17-:d:141573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/6/2/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/6/2/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galbraith, Jay R., 1971. "Matrix organization designs How to combine functional and project forms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 29-40, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anja Oberländer & Torsten Reimer, 2019. "Open Access and the Library," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-2, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Guadalupe & Hongyi Li & Julie Wulf, 2014. "Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 824-844, April.
    2. Luigi Mosca & Martina Gianecchini & Diego Campagnolo, 2021. "Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(1), pages 3-18, March.
    3. Peter B. Doeringer & Pacey Foster & Stephan Manning & David Terkla, 2013. "Project-based industries and craft-like production: structure, location and performance," Chapters, in: Frank Giarratani & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Philip McCann (ed.), Handbook of Industry Studies and Economic Geography, chapter 4, pages 99-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Krzysztof Gos, 2015. "The Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Matrix Organizational Structures (Kluczowe zalety i ograniczenia macierzowych struktur organizacyjnych)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(19), pages 66-83.
    5. Hobday, Mike, 2000. "The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 871-893, August.
    6. Karen Stephenson, 1995. "The Formation and Incorporation of Virtual Entrepreneurial Groups," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(3), pages 35-52, April.
    7. O'Malley, Eoin & Scott, Susan & Sorrell, Steve, 2003. "Barriers to Energy Efficiency: Evidence from Selected Sectors," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number PRS47.
    8. Maxim Sytch & Franz Wohlgezogen & Edward J. Zajac, 2018. "Collaborative by Design? How Matrix Organizations See/Do Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1130-1148, December.
    9. Giovanni Dosi & Mike Hobday & Luigi Marengo, 2000. "Problem-Solving Behaviours, Organisational Forms and the Complexity of Tasks," LEM Papers Series 2000/06, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Naldi, Maurizio & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2019. "Profit-fairness trade-off in project selection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-146.
    11. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    12. Jeffery L. Williams & Jerrell T. Stracener, 2013. "First steps in the development of a Program Organizational Architectural Framework (POAF)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 45-70, March.
    13. Mueller, Julia, 2014. "A specific knowledge culture: Cultural antecedents for knowledge sharing between project teams," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 190-202.
    14. Susan Biancani & Daniel A. McFarland & Linus Dahlander, 2014. "The Semiformal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1306-1324, October.
    15. Paton, Steve & Andrew, Barrie, 2019. "The role of the Project Management Office (PMO) in product lifecycle management: A case study in the defence industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 43-52.
    16. Rómulo Pinheiro & Bjørn Stensaker, 2014. "Designing the Entrepreneurial University: The Interpretation of a Global Idea," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 497-516, December.
    17. Christophe Midler, 1995. "Projectification of the Firm : the Renault Case," Post-Print hal-00262524, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:17-:d:141573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.