IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i4p417-d502732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Biotic Information in Species Distribution Models: A Coregionalized Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier Barber

    (Center of Operations Research (CIO), Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03202 Elche, Spain
    Current address: Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG).
    Current address: Valencia Bayesian Research Group (VaBaR), C/Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain.)

  • David Conesa

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain
    Current address: Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG).
    Current address: Valencia Bayesian Research Group (VaBaR), C/Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain.)

  • Antonio López-Quílez

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain
    Current address: Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG).
    Current address: Valencia Bayesian Research Group (VaBaR), C/Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain.)

  • Joaquín Martínez-Minaya

    (Data Science Area, Basque Center for Applied Mathematics (BCAM), 14 E48009 Bilbao, Spain
    Current address: Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG).
    Current address: Valencia Bayesian Research Group (VaBaR), C/Dr. Moliner 50, Burjassot, 46100 Valencia, Spain.)

  • Iosu Paradinas

    (Scottish Ocean’s Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, UK
    Current address: Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG).
    Current address: Asociación Ipar Perspective, Karabiondo kalea 14, 48600 Sopela, Spain.)

  • Maria Grazia Pennino

    (Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Subida a Radio Faro, 50-52, 36390 Vigo, Spain
    Current address: Statistical Modeling Ecology Group (SMEG).)

Abstract

In this work, we discuss the use of a methodological approach for modelling spatial relationships among species by means of a Bayesian spatial coregionalized model. Inference and prediction is performed using the integrated nested Laplace approximation methodology to reduce the computational burden. We illustrate the performance of the coregionalized model in species interaction scenarios using both simulated and real data. The simulation demonstrates the better predictive performance of the coregionalized model with respect to the univariate models. The case study focus on the spatial distribution of a prey species, the European anchovy ( Engraulis encrasicolus ), and one of its predator species, the European hake ( Merluccius merluccius ), in the Mediterranean sea. The results indicate that European hake and anchovy are positively associated, resulting in improved model predictions using the coregionalized model.

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier Barber & David Conesa & Antonio López-Quílez & Joaquín Martínez-Minaya & Iosu Paradinas & Maria Grazia Pennino, 2021. "Incorporating Biotic Information in Species Distribution Models: A Coregionalized Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:417-:d:502732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fois, Mauro & Cuena-Lombraña, Alba & Fenu, Giuseppe & Bacchetta, Gianluigi, 2018. "Using species distribution models at local scale to guide the search of poorly known species: Review, methodological issues and future directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 385(C), pages 124-132.
    2. Xavier Barber & David Conesa & Antonio López-Quílez & Javier Morales, 2019. "Multivariate Bioclimatic Indices Modelling: A Coregionalised Approach," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(2), pages 225-244, June.
    3. Coll, M. & Pennino, M. Grazia & Steenbeek, J. & Sole, J. & Bellido, J.M., 2019. "Predicting marine species distributions: Complementarity of food-web and Bayesian hierarchical modelling approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 405(C), pages 86-101.
    4. Håvard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392, April.
    5. Charlotte M. Jones‐Todd & Ben Swallow & Janine B. Illian & Mike Toms, 2018. "A spatiotemporal multispecies model of a semicontinuous response," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(3), pages 705-722, April.
    6. Finn Lindgren & Håvard Rue & Johan Lindström, 2011. "An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(4), pages 423-498, September.
    7. Geir-Arne Fuglstad & Daniel Simpson & Finn Lindgren & Håvard Rue, 2019. "Constructing Priors that Penalize the Complexity of Gaussian Random Fields," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(525), pages 445-452, January.
    8. Noel Cressie & Andrew Zammit-Mangion, 2016. "Multivariate spatial covariance models: a conditional approach," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 915-935.
    9. Ludwig Fahrmeir & Stefan Lang, 2001. "Bayesian Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Multicategorical Time-Space Data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(1), pages 11-30, March.
    10. Schlather, Martin & Malinowski, Alexander & Menck, Peter J. & Oesting, Marco & Strokorb, Kirstin, 2015. "Analysis, Simulation and Prediction of Multivariate Random Fields with Package RandomFields," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigues, Lucas dos Santos & Daudt, Nicholas Winterle & Cardoso, Luis Gustavo & Kinas, Paul Gerhard & Conesa, David & Pennino, Maria Grazia, 2023. "Species distribution modelling in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean: A systematic review and trends," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    2. Jonathan Wakefield & Taylor Okonek & Jon Pedersen, 2020. "Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 398-418, August.
    3. Jacqueline D. Seufert & Andre Python & Christoph Weisser & Elías Cisneros & Krisztina Kis‐Katos & Thomas Kneib, 2022. "Mapping ex ante risks of COVID‐19 in Indonesia using a Bayesian geostatistical model on airport network data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2121-2155, October.
    4. Paige, John & Fuglstad, Geir-Arne & Riebler, Andrea & Wakefield, Jon, 2022. "Bayesian multiresolution modeling of georeferenced data: An extension of ‘LatticeKrig’," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Aaron Osgood‐Zimmerman & Jon Wakefield, 2023. "A Statistical Review of Template Model Builder: A Flexible Tool for Spatial Modelling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 318-342, August.
    6. Sameh Abdulah & Yuxiao Li & Jian Cao & Hatem Ltaief & David E. Keyes & Marc G. Genton & Ying Sun, 2023. "Large‐scale environmental data science with ExaGeoStatR," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), February.
    7. Luis A. Barboza & Shu Wei Chou Chen & Marcela Alfaro Córdoba & Eric J. Alfaro & Hugo G. Hidalgo, 2023. "Spatio‐temporal downscaling emulator for regional climate models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), November.
    8. Silius M. Vandeskog & Sara Martino & Daniela Castro-Camilo & Håvard Rue, 2022. "Modelling Sub-daily Precipitation Extremes with the Blended Generalised Extreme Value Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 598-621, December.
    9. Van Niekerk, Janet & Krainski, Elias & Rustand, Denis & Rue, Håvard, 2023. "A new avenue for Bayesian inference with INLA," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Taylor, Benjamin M. & Davies, Tilman M. & Rowlingson, Barry S. & Diggle, Peter J., 2015. "Bayesian Inference and Data Augmentation Schemes for Spatial, Spatiotemporal and Multivariate Log-Gaussian Cox Processes in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i07).
    11. Jorge Sicacha-Parada & Diego Pavon-Jordan & Ingelin Steinsland & Roel May & Bård Stokke & Ingar Jostein Øien, 2022. "A Spatial Modeling Framework for Monitoring Surveys with Different Sampling Protocols with a Case Study for Bird Abundance in Mid-Scandinavia," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 562-591, September.
    12. Brown, Patrick E., 2015. "Model-Based Geostatistics the Easy Way," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i12).
    13. Peter A. Gao & Hannah M. Director & Cecilia M. Bitz & Adrian E. Raftery, 2022. "Probabilistic Forecasts of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 280-302, June.
    14. Wang, Craig & Furrer, Reinhard, 2021. "Combining heterogeneous spatial datasets with process-based spatial fusion models: A unifying framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Yuan Yan & Eva Cantoni & Chris Field & Margaret Treble & Joanna Mills Flemming, 2023. "Spatiotemporal modeling of mature‐at‐length data using a sliding window approach," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.
    16. Daniel Cervone & Alex D’Amour & Luke Bornn & Kirk Goldsberry, 2016. "A Multiresolution Stochastic Process Model for Predicting Basketball Possession Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 585-599, April.
    17. Daniela Castro-Camilo & Raphaël Huser & Håvard Rue, 2019. "A Spliced Gamma-Generalized Pareto Model for Short-Term Extreme Wind Speed Probabilistic Forecasting," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 517-534, September.
    18. Xin Fang & Bo Fang & Chunfang Wang & Tian Xia & Matteo Bottai & Fang Fang & Yang Cao, 2019. "Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Generalized Additive Models for Assessing the Association between Daily Exposure to Fine Particles and Respiratory Mortality: A Simulation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. I Gede Nyoman Mindra Jaya & Henk Folmer, 2024. "High-Resolution Spatiotemporal Forecasting with Missing Observations Including an Application to Daily Particulate Matter 2.5 Concentrations in Jakarta Province, Indonesia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-29, September.
    20. Athanasios C. Micheas & Jiaxun Chen, 2018. "sppmix: Poisson point process modeling using normal mixture models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1767-1798, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:417-:d:502732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.