IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i17p2039-d621267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Transfer Learning for Cycle Time Forecasting for Semiconductor Wafer Lot under Different Work in Process Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Junliang Wang

    (Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Pengjie Gao

    (Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Zhe Li

    (Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Wei Bai

    (State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Shenzhen Huazhong University of Science and Technology Research Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China)

Abstract

The accurate cycle time (CT) prediction of the wafer fabrication remains a tough task, as the system level of work in process (WIP) is fluctuant. Aiming to construct one unified CT forecasting model under dynamic WIP levels, this paper proposes a transfer learning method for finetuning the predicted neural network hierarchically. First, a two-dimensional (2D) convolutional neural network was constructed to predict the CT under a primary WIP level with the input of spatial-temporal characteristics by reorganizing the input parameters. Then, to predict the CT under another WIP level, a hierarchical optimization transfer learning strategy was designed to finetune the prediction model so as to improve the accuracy of the CT forecasting. The experimental results demonstrated that the hierarchically transfer learning approach outperforms the compared methods in the CT forecasting with the fluctuation of WIP levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Junliang Wang & Pengjie Gao & Zhe Li & Wei Bai, 2021. "Hierarchical Transfer Learning for Cycle Time Forecasting for Semiconductor Wafer Lot under Different Work in Process Levels," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2039-:d:621267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Mönch & Reha Uzsoy & John W. Fowler, 2018. "A survey of semiconductor supply chain models part III: master planning, production planning, and demand fulfilment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4565-4584, July.
    2. Feng Yang & Bruce E. Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson, 2008. "Estimating Cycle Time Percentile Curves for Manufacturing Systems via Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 628-643, November.
    3. Chuwen Zhang & Jonathan F. Bard & Rodolfo Chacon, 2017. "Controlling work in process during semiconductor assembly and test operations," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(24), pages 7251-7275, December.
    4. Chuang Wang & Pingyu Jiang, 2019. "Deep neural networks based order completion time prediction by using real-time job shop RFID data," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1303-1318, March.
    5. Reha Uzsoy & John W. Fowler & Lars Mönch, 2018. "A survey of semiconductor supply chain models Part II: demand planning, inventory management, and capacity planning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4546-4564, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianxin Fang & Brenda Cheang & Andrew Lim, 2023. "Problems and Solution Methods of Machine Scheduling in Semiconductor Manufacturing Operations: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-44, August.
    2. Smirnov, Dina & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Atan, Zümbül & de Kok, Ton, 2021. "Long-term resource planning in the high-tech industry: Capacity or inventory?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 926-940.
    3. Hu, Man & Liu, Xue-Xin & Jia, Fu, 2024. "Optimal Emergency Order Policy for Supply Disruptions in the Semiconductor Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Wolfgang Albrecht & Martin Steinrücke, 2020. "Continuous-time scheduling of production, distribution and sales in photovoltaic supply chains with declining prices," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 629-667, September.
    5. Vasvári, Tamás & Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Longauer, Dóra, 2024. "Kiszervezési stratégiák és tanulási hatás a félvezetőiparban [Outsourcing strategies and the learning effect in the semiconductor industry]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 176-200.
    6. Seitz, Alexander & Grunow, Martin & Akkerman, Renzo, 2020. "Data driven supply allocation to individual customers considering forecast bias," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Xi Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2016. "Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 629-644, November.
    8. Juan Pablo Usuga Cadavid & Samir Lamouri & Bernard Grabot & Robert Pellerin & Arnaud Fortin, 2020. "Machine learning applied in production planning and control: a state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1531-1558, August.
    9. Batur, Demet & Bekki, Jennifer M. & Chen, Xi, 2018. "Quantile regression metamodeling: Toward improved responsiveness in the high-tech electronics manufacturing industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 212-224.
    10. Chen, Xi & Zhou, Qiang, 2017. "Sequential design strategies for mean response surface metamodeling via stochastic kriging with adaptive exploration and exploitation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 575-585.
    11. Ghadimi, Foad & Aouam, Tarik, 2021. "Planning capacity and safety stocks in a serial production–distribution system with multiple products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 533-552.
    12. Shaohua Huang & Yu Guo & Nengjun Yang & Shanshan Zha & Daoyuan Liu & Weiguang Fang, 2021. "A weighted fuzzy C-means clustering method with density peak for anomaly detection in IoT-enabled manufacturing process," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1845-1861, October.
    13. Vishal Kashav & Chandra Prakash Garg & Rupesh Kumar, 2023. "Ranking the strategies to overcome the barriers of the maritime supply chain (MSC) of containerized freight under fuzzy environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1223-1268, May.
    14. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & Shaaban, Sabry & Marsillac, Erika & Hurtado, Margarita, 2018. "Exploiting the characteristics of serial queues to reduce the mean and variance of flow time using combined priority rules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 211-225.
    15. Christ, Quentin & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Lepelletier, Guillaume, 2019. "An Iterated Min–Max procedure for practical workload balancing on non-identical parallel machines in manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 419-428.
    16. Masaki Okada & Kunio Shirahada, 2022. "Organizational Learning for Sustainable Semiconductor Supply Chain Operation: A Case Study of a Japanese Company in Cross Border M&A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Antonio Lorenzo-Espejo & Alejandro Escudero-Santana & María-Luisa Muñoz-Díaz & Alicia Robles-Velasco, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Analysis of a Wind Turbine Manufacturing Operation: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:17:p:2039-:d:621267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.