IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i7p1121-d382285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-Way Decisions Making Using Covering Based Fractional Orthotriple Fuzzy Rough Set Model

Author

Listed:
  • Shougi S. Abosuliman

    (Department of Transportation and Port Management, Faculty of Maritime Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21588, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saleem Abdullah

    (Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Qiyas

    (Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Pakistan)

Abstract

On the basis of decision-theoretical rough sets (DTRSs), the three-way decisions give new model of decision approach for deal with the problem of decision. This proposed model of decision method is based on the loss function of DTRSs. First, the concept of fractional orthotriple fuzzy β -covering (FOF β -covering) and fractional orthotriple fuzzy β -neighborhood (FOF β -neighborhood) was introduced. We combined loss feature of DTRSs with covering-based fractional orthotriple fuzzy rough sets (CFOFSs) under the fractional orthotriple fuzzy condition. Secondly, we proposed a new FOF-covering decision-theoretical rough sets model (FOFCDTRSs) and developed related properties. Then, based on the grade of positive, neutral and negative membership of fractional orthotriple fuzzy numbers (FOFNs), five methods are established for addressing the expected loss expressed in the form of FOFNs and the corresponding three-way decisions are also derived. Based on this, we presented a FOFCDTRS-based algorithm for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). Then, an example verifies the feasibility of the five methods for solving the MCDM problem. Finally, by comparing the results of the decisions of five methods with different loss functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shougi S. Abosuliman & Saleem Abdullah & Muhammad Qiyas, 2020. "Three-Way Decisions Making Using Covering Based Fractional Orthotriple Fuzzy Rough Set Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:7:p:1121-:d:382285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rula Ghandour & Azza Shoaibi & Rana Khatib & Niveen Abu Rmeileh & Belgin Unal & Kaan Sözmen & Bülent Kılıç & Fouad Fouad & Radwan Al Ali & Habiba Ben Romdhane & Wafa Aissi & Balsam Ahmad & Simon Capew, 2015. "Priority setting for the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases: multi-criteria decision analysis in four eastern Mediterranean countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(1), pages 73-81, January.
    2. Jurgita Antucheviciene & Madjid Tavana & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Romualdas Bausys, 2017. "Managing Information Uncertainty and Complexity in Decision-Making," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-3, November.
    3. Shouzhen Zeng & Muhammad Munir & Tahir Mahmood & Muhammad Naeem, 2020. "Some T-Spherical Fuzzy Einstein Interactive Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Selection of Photovoltaic Cells," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-16, June.
    4. Guiwu Wei, 2016. "Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 491-502, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saleem Abdullah & Alaa O. Almagrabi & Ihsan Ullah, 2023. "A New Approach to Artificial Intelligent Based Three-Way Decision Making and Analyzing S-Box Image Encryption Using TOPSIS Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Lu Chen & Ayad Hendalianpour & Mohammad Reza Feylizadeh & Haiyan Xu, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Use of Blockchain Technology in Humanitarian Supply Chain: A Novel Fuzzy Large-Scale Group-DEMATEL," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 359-394, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Jabir Khan & Poom Kumam & Peide Liu & Wiyada Kumam & Shahzaib Ashraf, 2019. "A Novel Approach to Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets and Its Application in Decision Support System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Shio Gai Quek & Ganeshsree Selvachandran & Florentin Smarandache & J. Vimala & Son Hoang Le & Quang-Thinh Bui & Vassilis C. Gerogiannis, 2020. "Entropy Measures for Plithogenic Sets and Applications in Multi-Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Siqi Zhang & Hui Gao & Guiwu Wei & Yu Wei & Cun Wei, 2019. "Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making under Picture 2-Tuple Linguistic Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Meiling Liu & Shouzhen Zeng & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Picture Fuzzy Weighted Distance Measures and their Application to Investment Selection," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 682-682, August.
    5. Wei Yang & Yongfeng Pang, 2022. "T-Spherical Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Jiahuan He & Xindi Wang & Runtong Zhang & Li Li, 2019. "Some q -Rung Picture Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators with Their Application to Project Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Nhat-Luong Nhieu, 2024. "The T-Spherical Fuzzy Einstein Interaction Operation Matrix Energy Decision-Making Approach: The Context of Vietnam Offshore Wind Energy Storage Technologies Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Shahzaib Ashraf & Saleem Abdullah & Lazim Abdullah, 2019. "Child Development Influence Environmental Factors Determined Using Spherical Fuzzy Distance Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Vladimir Simić & Radovan Soušek & Stefan Jovčić, 2020. "Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-29, December.
    10. M Sarwar Sindhu & Tabasam Rashid & Agha Kashif, 2019. "Modeling of linear programming and extended TOPSIS in decision making problem under the framework of picture fuzzy sets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Chady Jabbour & Anis Hoayek & Jean-Michel Salles, 2022. "Formalizing a Two-Step Decision-Making Process in Land Use: Evidence from Controlling Forest Clearcutting Using Spatial Information," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Suizhi Luo & Lining Xing, 2019. "Picture Fuzzy Interaction Partitioned Heronian Aggregation Operators for Hotel Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Saifullah Khan & Saleem Abdullah & Lazim Abdullah & Shahzaib Ashraf, 2019. "Logarithmic Aggregation Operators of Picture Fuzzy Numbers for Multi-Attribute Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Arshad Ahmad Khan & Muhammad Qiyas & Saleem Abdullah & Jianchao Luo & Mahwish Bano, 2019. "Analysis of Robot Selection Based on 2-Tuple Picture Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Peng Liu & Tieyan Zhang & Furui Tian & Yun Teng & Miaodong Yang, 2024. "Optimized Grid Partitioning and Scheduling in Multi-Energy Systems Using a Hybrid Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Gia Sirbiladze, 2021. "Associated Probabilities in Interactive MADM under Discrimination q-Rung Picture Linguistic Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-36, September.
    17. Sanjib Biswas & Dragan Pamucar, 2023. "A modified EDAS model for comparison of mobile wallet service providers in India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-31, December.
    18. Faruk Görçün, Ömer. & Chatterjee, Prasenjit. & Stević, Željko. & Küçükönder, Hande., 2024. "An integrated model for road freight transport firm selection in third-party logistics using T-spherical Fuzzy sets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:7:p:1121-:d:382285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.