IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i3p307-d325148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Super-Fast Computation for the Three-Asset Equity-Linked Securities Using the Finite Difference Method

Author

Listed:
  • Chaeyoung Lee

    (Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Jisang Lyu

    (Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Eunchae Park

    (Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Wonjin Lee

    (Department of Financial Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Sangkwon Kim

    (Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Darae Jeong

    (Department of Mathematics, Kangwon National University, Gangwon-do 24341, Korea)

  • Junseok Kim

    (Department of Mathematics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

In this article, we propose a super-fast computational algorithm for three-asset equity-linked securities (ELS) using the finite difference method (FDM). ELS is a very popular investment product in South Korea. There are one-, two-, and three-asset ELS. The three-asset ELS is the most popular financial product among them. FDM has been used for pricing the one- and two-asset ELS because it is accurate. However, the three-asset ELS is still priced using the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) due to the curse of dimensionality for FDM. To overcome the limitation of dimension for FDM, we propose a systematic non-uniform grid with an explicit Euler scheme and an optimal implementation of the algorithm. The computational time is less than 6 s. We perform standard ELS option pricing and compare the results from the fast FDM with the ones from MCS. The computational results confirm the superiority and practicality of the proposed algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaeyoung Lee & Jisang Lyu & Eunchae Park & Wonjin Lee & Sangkwon Kim & Darae Jeong & Junseok Kim, 2020. "Super-Fast Computation for the Three-Asset Equity-Linked Securities Using the Finite Difference Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:307-:d:325148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/3/307/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/3/307/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Junseok & Kim, Taekkeun & Jo, Jaehyun & Choi, Yongho & Lee, Seunggyu & Hwang, Hyeongseok & Yoo, Minhyun & Jeong, Darae, 2016. "A practical finite difference method for the three-dimensional Black–Scholes equation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 183-190.
    2. Seda Gulen & Catalin Popescu & Murat Sari, 2019. "A New Approach for the Black–Scholes Model with Linear and Nonlinear Volatilities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    4. Tristan Guillaume, 2015. "Autocallable Structured Products," Post-Print hal-02979985, HAL.
    5. Darae Jeong & Minhyun Yoo & Junseok Kim, 2018. "Finite Difference Method for the Black–Scholes Equation Without Boundary Conditions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 961-972, April.
    6. Kyoung-Sook Moon & Hongjoong Kim, 2013. "A multi-dimensional local average lattice method for multi-asset models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 873-884, May.
    7. Tristan Guillaume, 2019. "On the multidimensional Black–Scholes partial differential equation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 281(1), pages 229-251, October.
    8. Martin B. Haugh & Leonid Kogan, 2004. "Pricing American Options: A Duality Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 258-270, April.
    9. Phelim Boyle & Yisong Tian, 1998. "An explicit finite difference approach to the pricing of barrier options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 17-43.
    10. Пигнастый, Олег & Koжевников, Георгий, 2019. "Распределенная Динамическая Pde-Модель Программного Управления Загрузкой Технологического Оборудования Производственной Линии [Distributed dynamic PDE-model of a program control by utilization of t," MPRA Paper 93278, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Feb 2019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Hangsuck & Ha, Hongjun & Kong, Byungdoo & Lee, Minha, 2024. "Valuing three-asset barrier options and autocallable products via exit probabilities of Brownian bridge," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangkwon Kim & Darae Jeong & Chaeyoung Lee & Junseok Kim, 2020. "Finite Difference Method for the Multi-Asset Black–Scholes Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Calypso Herrera & Florian Krach & Pierre Ruyssen & Josef Teichmann, 2021. "Optimal Stopping via Randomized Neural Networks," Papers 2104.13669, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    3. Cosma, Antonio & Galluccio, Stefano & Pederzoli, Paola & Scaillet, Olivier, 2020. "Early Exercise Decision in American Options with Dividends, Stochastic Volatility, and Jumps," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(1), pages 331-356, February.
    4. Li, Chenxu & Ye, Yongxin, 2019. "Pricing and Exercising American Options: an Asymptotic Expansion Approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Antonio Cosma & Stefano Galluccio & Paola Pederzoli & O. Scaillet, 2012. "Valuing American Options Using Fast Recursive Projections," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 12-26, Swiss Finance Institute.
    6. Louis Bhim & Reiichiro Kawai, 2018. "Smooth Upper Bounds For The Price Function Of American Style Options," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Andersson, Kristoffer & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "A deep learning approach for computations of exposure profiles for high-dimensional Bermudan options," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 408(C).
    8. Jin, Xing & Li, Xun & Tan, Hwee Huat & Wu, Zhenyu, 2013. "A computationally efficient state-space partitioning approach to pricing high-dimensional American options via dimension reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 362-370.
    9. David B. Brown & James E. Smith & Peng Sun, 2010. "Information Relaxations and Duality in Stochastic Dynamic Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 785-801, August.
    10. Wei, Wei & Zhu, Dan, 2022. "Generic improvements to least squares monte carlo methods with applications to optimal stopping problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1132-1144.
    11. Lyu, Jisang & Park, Eunchae & Kim, Sangkwon & Lee, Wonjin & Lee, Chaeyoung & Yoon, Sungha & Park, Jintae & Kim, Junseok, 2021. "Optimal non-uniform finite difference grids for the Black–Scholes equations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 690-704.
    12. Maximilian Mair & Jan Maruhn, 2013. "On the primal-dual algorithm for callable Bermudan options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-110, April.
    13. Yacin Jerbi, 2016. "Early exercise premium method for pricing American options under the J-model," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Yeda Cui & Lingfei Li & Gongqiu Zhang, 2024. "Pricing and hedging autocallable products by Markov chain approximation," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 259-303, October.
    15. Simon Scheidegger & Adrien Treccani, 2021. "Pricing American Options under High-Dimensional Models with Recursive Adaptive Sparse Expectations [Telling from Discrete Data Whether the Underlying Continuous-Time Model Is a Diffusion]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 258-290.
    16. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    17. Ravi Kashyap, 2022. "Options as Silver Bullets: Valuation of Term Loans, Inventory Management, Emissions Trading and Insurance Risk Mitigation using Option Theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1175-1215, August.
    18. Secomandi, Nicola & Seppi, Duane J., 2014. "Real Options and Merchant Operations of Energy and Other Commodities," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 6(3-4), pages 161-331, July.
    19. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami, 2019. "Testing of binary regime switching models using squeeze duration analysis," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Seiler, Volker, 2024. "The relationship between Chinese and FOB prices of rare earth elements – Evidence in the time and frequency domain," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 160-179.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:3:p:307-:d:325148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.