IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i5p803-d1601929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Route Optimization of Hazardous Material Railway Transportation Based on Conditional Value-at-Risk Considering Risk Equity

Author

Listed:
  • Liping Liu

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Shilei Sun

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Shuxia Li

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

Rail transportation of hazardous material (Hazmat) involves low-probability, and high-consequence risks, requiring strategies that mitigate extreme accident impacts while ensuring fair risk distribution. To address this, we introduce conditional value-at-risk with equity (CVaRE) into railway Hazmats risk assessment, enabling flexible decision-making that balances risk minimization and equity considerations. Unlike conventional models that focus solely on risk reduction, CVaRE incorporates a risk equity goal, ensuring a more balanced distribution of risk across transportation routes. This study develops a novel CVaRE model that replaces fixed threshold constraints with a dynamic risk equity goal, providing greater flexibility in risk distribution adjustments. A k-shortest path-based algorithm was designed to balance extreme risk minimization with equitable risk allocation in route selection. A case study on the Yangtze River Delta railway network validates the model, demonstrating that moderate cost increases can significantly reduce extreme accident risks while achieving fairer risk distribution. Findings also show that direct transportation improves risk equity over transfer-based routes, highlighting the importance of strategic route planning. This research offers practical decision support for transport companies and regulators, helping optimize routes while ensuring cost efficiency and regulatory compliance. It also provides a scientific foundation for risk-equity-based policies, promoting safer, more sustainable Hazmat railway transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liping Liu & Shilei Sun & Shuxia Li, 2025. "Route Optimization of Hazardous Material Railway Transportation Based on Conditional Value-at-Risk Considering Risk Equity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:803-:d:1601929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingying Kang & Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Value-at-Risk model for hazardous material transportation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 361-387, November.
    2. Fang, Kan & Fu, Enyuan & Huang, Dian & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2025. "A value-at-risk based approach to the routing problem of multi-hazmat railcars," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(1), pages 132-145.
    3. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson, 2000. "Catastrophe Avoidance Models for Hazardous Materials Route Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 165-179, May.
    4. Assadipour, Ghazal & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2015. "Planning and managing intermodal transportation of hazardous materials with capacity selection and congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 45-57.
    5. Liping Liu & Qing Wu & Shuxia Li & Ying Li & Tijun Fan, 2021. "Risk Assessment of Hazmat Road Transportation Considering Environmental Risk under Time-Varying Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Jingwen Qi & Shuaian Wang, 2023. "LNG Bunkering Station Deployment Problem—A Case Study of a Chinese Container Shipping Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Liu Su & Changhyun Kwon, 2020. "Risk-Averse Network Design with Behavioral Conditional Value-at-Risk for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 184-203, January.
    8. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    9. Fontaine, Pirmin & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Minner, Stefan, 2020. "Population-based risk equilibration for the multimode hazmat transport network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 188-200.
    10. Shujian Ma & Jilong Cai & Gang Wang & Xiangxiang Ge & Ying Teng & Hua Jiang, 2024. "Research on Decision Analysis with CVaR for Supply Chain Finance Based on Blockchain Technology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    12. Lucio Bianco & Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani & Veronica Piccialli, 2016. "A Game-Theoretic Approach for Regulating Hazmat Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 424-438, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    2. Fang, Kan & Fu, Enyuan & Huang, Dian & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2025. "A value-at-risk based approach to the routing problem of multi-hazmat railcars," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(1), pages 132-145.
    3. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    4. Liping Liu & Jiaming Li & Lei Zhou & Tijun Fan & Shuxia Li, 2021. "Research on Route Optimization of Hazardous Materials Transportation Considering Risk Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Liu Su & Changhyun Kwon, 2020. "Risk-Averse Network Design with Behavioral Conditional Value-at-Risk for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 184-203, January.
    6. Bogyrbayeva, Aigerim & Kwon, Changhyun, 2021. "Pessimistic evasive flow capturing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 133-148.
    7. Fontaine, Pirmin & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Minner, Stefan, 2020. "Population-based risk equilibration for the multimode hazmat transport network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 188-200.
    8. Wu, Weitiao & Ma, Jian & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2022. "Multi-class hazmat distribution network design with inventory and superimposed risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Bhavsar, Nishit & Verma, Manish, 2022. "A subsidy policy to managing hazmat risk in railroad transportation network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 633-646.
    10. Zhang, Meng & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Jiang, Bin, 2021. "Vehicle routing optimization for hazmat shipments considering catastrophe avoidance and failed edges," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Tao, Liangyan & Liu, Sifeng & Xie, Naiming & Javed, Saad Ahmed, 2021. "Optimal position of supply chain delivery window with risk-averse suppliers: A CVaR optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    12. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Zhaoqi Zang & Richard Batley & Xiangdong Xu & David Z. W. Wang, 2022. "On the value of distribution tail in the valuation of travel time variability," Papers 2207.06293, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    14. Zang, Zhaoqi & Batley, Richard & Xu, Xiangdong & Wang, David Z.W., 2024. "On the value of distribution tail in the valuation of travel time variability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Kumar, Anand & Roy, Debjit & Verter, Vedat & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Integrated fleet mix and routing decision for hazmat transportation: A developing country perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 225-238.
    16. Ginger Y. Ke, 2022. "Managing rail-truck intermodal transportation for hazardous materials with random yard disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 457-483, February.
    17. Ghaffarinasab, Nader & Çavuş, Özlem & Kara, Bahar Y., 2023. "A mean-CVaR approach to the risk-averse single allocation hub location problem with flow-dependent economies of scale," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 32-53.
    18. Chiou, Suh-Wen, 2018. "A traffic-responsive signal control to enhance road network resilience with hazmat transportation in multiple periods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 105-118.
    19. Oleksandr Romanko & Helmut Mausser, 2016. "Robust scenario-based value-at-risk optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 203-218, February.
    20. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Cao, Yunzhi, 2021. "The optimal recovery-fund based strategy for uncertain supply chain disruptions: A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:803-:d:1601929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.