IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i3p443-d1579271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Microsimulation Model for Sustainability and Detailed Adequacy Analysis of the Retirement Pension System

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Villanueva-García

    (Group of Analysis, Security and Systems (GASS), Department of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (DISIA), Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ignacio Moral-Arce

    (Institute of Fiscal Studies (IEF), Ministry of Finance, Avenida del Cardenal Herrera Oria 378, 28035 Madrid, Spain)

  • Luis Javier García Villalba

    (Group of Analysis, Security and Systems (GASS), Department of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (DISIA), Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The sustainability and adequacy of pension systems are central to public policy debates in aging societies. This paper introduces a novel microsimulation model with probabilistic behavior to assess these dual challenges in the Spanish pension system. The model employs a mixed-projection method, integrating a macro approach—using economic and demographic aggregates from official sources such as the Spanish Statistics Office (INE) and Eurostat—with a micro approach based on the Continuous Sample of Working Lives (MCVL) dataset from Spanish Social Security. This framework enables individual-level projections of key labor market variables, including work time, salary, and initial pensions, under diverse reform scenarios. The results demonstrate the model’s ability to predict initial pensions with high accuracy, providing detailed insights into adequacy by age, gender, and income levels, as well as distributional measures such as density functions and quantiles. Sustainability findings indicate that pension expenditures are projected to stabilize at 13.9% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2050. The proposed model provides a robust and versatile tool for policymakers, offering a comprehensive evaluation of the long-term impacts of pension reforms on both system sustainability and individual adequacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Villanueva-García & Ignacio Moral-Arce & Luis Javier García Villalba, 2025. "A Microsimulation Model for Sustainability and Detailed Adequacy Analysis of the Retirement Pension System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:443-:d:1579271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Blundell & Costas Meghir & Sarah Smith, 2002. "Pension Incentives and the Pattern of Early Retirement," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(478), pages 153-170, March.
    2. Axel Börsch‐Supan & Alexander Ludwig & Joachim Winter, 2006. "Ageing, Pension Reform and Capital Flows: A Multi‐Country Simulation Model," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 73(292), pages 625-658, November.
    3. Hou, Shehong & Niu, Yingjie & Yang, Jinqiang, 2018. "Optimal consumption-portfolio rules with biased beliefs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 152-157.
    4. Chia, Ngee Choon & Tsui, Albert K. C., 2003. "Life annuities of compulsory savings and income adequacy of the elderly in Singapore," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 41-65, March.
    5. Heer, Burkhard & Polito, Vito & Wickens, Michael R., 2020. "Population aging, social security and fiscal limits," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Davide Bazzana, 2020. "Ageing population and pension system sustainability: reforms and redistributive implications," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(3), pages 971-992, October.
    7. Kyrre Stensnes & Nils Martin Stølen, 2007. "Pension Reform in Norway. Microsimulating effects on government expenditures, labour supply incentives and benefit distribution," Discussion Papers 524, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    8. repec:bla:ausecr:v:39:y:2006:i:3:p:273-292 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. van Sonsbeek, Jan-Maarten, 2010. "Micro simulations on the effects of ageing-related policy measures," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 968-979, September.
    10. Dybvig, Philip H. & Liu, Hong, 2010. "Lifetime consumption and investment: Retirement and constrained borrowing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 885-907, May.
    11. J. Iñaki De La Peña & M. Cristina Fernández-Ramos & Asier Garayeta & Iratxe D. Martín, 2022. "Transforming Private Pensions: An Actuarial Model to Face Long-Term Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Montserrat Gonzalez Garibay, 2023. "The Retirement Decision in Dynamic Microsimulation Models: An Exploratory Review," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 16(3), pages 19-48.
    13. Börsch-Supan, Axel & Reil-Held, Anette & Schunk, Daniel, 2008. "Saving incentives, old-age provision and displacement effects: evidence from the recent German pension reform," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 295-319, November.
    14. Kyoung Jin Choi & Gyoocheol Shim & Yong Hyun Shin, 2008. "Optimal Portfolio, Consumption‐Leisure And Retirement Choice Problem With Ces Utility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 445-472, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meritxell Solé & Guadalupe Souto & Concepció Patxot, 2019. "Sustainability and Adequacy of the Spanish Pension System after the 2013 Reform: A Microsimulation Analysis," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 228(1), pages 109-150, March.
    2. Concepció Patxot & Meritxell Solé & Guadalupe Souto & Martin Spielauer, 2018. "The Impact of the Retirement Decision and Demographics on Pension Sustainability: A Dynamic Microsimulation Analysis," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(2), pages 84-108.
    3. Park, Seyoung, 2015. "A generalization of Yaari’s result on annuitization with optimal retirement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 17-20.
    4. Florina Salaghe & Dimitra Papadovasilaki & Federico Guerrero & James Sundali, 2020. "Temptation and Retirement Accounts: A Story of Time Inconsistency and Bounded Rationality," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 6(3), pages 173-198, April.
    5. Jeon, Junkee & Park, Kyunghyun, 2023. "Optimal job switching and retirement decision," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    6. Jan Hagemejer & Marcin Bielecki & Karolina Goraus & Joanna Tyrowicz, 2014. "The Sooner The Better - The Welfare Effects of the Retirement Age Increase Under Various Pension Schemes," EcoMod2014 6868, EcoMod.
    7. Giorgio Ferrari & Shihao Zhu, 2023. "Optimal Retirement Choice under Age-dependent Force of Mortality," Papers 2311.12169, arXiv.org.
    8. Bäuerle Nicole & Chen An, 2019. "Optimal retirement planning under partial information," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 36(1-4), pages 37-55, December.
    9. Ding, Guodong & Marazzina, Daniele, 2022. "The impact of liquidity constraints and cashflows on the optimal retirement problem," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    10. Holger Bonin, 2009. "15 Years of Pension Reform in Germany: Old Successes and New Threats," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 34(4), pages 548-560, October.
    11. Barucci, Emilio & Biffis, Enrico & Marazzina, Daniele, 2023. "Health insurance, portfolio choice, and retirement incentives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 910-921.
    12. Chae, Jiwon & Jang, Bong-Gyu & Park, Seyoung, 2023. "Analytic approach for models of optimal retirement with disability risk," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 68-75.
    13. Lin He & Zongxia Liang & Yilun Song & Qi Ye, 2021. "Optimal Retirement Time and Consumption with the Variation in Habitual Persistence," Papers 2103.16800, arXiv.org.
    14. Zhou Yang & Hyeng Keun Koo, 2018. "Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Selection with Early Retirement Option," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1378-1404, November.
    15. Chen, An & Hentschel, Felix & Steffensen, Mogens, 2021. "On retirement time decision making," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 107-129.
    16. Eren, Okan & Genç İleri, Şerife, 2022. "Life cycle analysis of savings accounts with matching contributions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    17. Hyeng Keun Koo & Kum-Hwan Roh & Yong Hyun Shin, 2021. "Optimal consumption/investment and retirement with necessities and luxuries," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(2), pages 281-317, October.
    18. Ferrari, Giorgio & Zhu, Shihao, 2023. "Optimal Retirement Choice under Age-dependent Force of Mortality," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 683, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    19. Alain Bensoussan & Bong-Gyu Jang & Seyoung Park, 2016. "Unemployment Risks and Optimal Retirement in an Incomplete Market," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1015-1032, August.
    20. Chen, An & Ferrari, Giorgio & Zhu, Shihao, 2023. "Striking the Balance: Life Insurance Timing and Asset Allocation in Financial Planning," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 684, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:443-:d:1579271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.