IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2024i1p93-d1555840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Modeling of Common Institutional Ownership’s Governance Effect on Corporate Leverage Manipulation

Author

Listed:
  • Shiqi Liu

    (Department of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China)

  • Xiaoyu Wang

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Cong Li

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Yuchen Zhang

    (Department of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China)

Abstract

Common institutional ownership, as a pivotal link of equity interconnection among diverse enterprises and a vital medium of information dissemination, possesses enhanced motivation and capability of decision-making in the course of business operation and development. This paper examines the effect of common institutional ownership on corporate leverage manipulation by applying panel data analysis method based on a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2021. We find that firms with high levels of common institutional ownership significantly reduce leverage manipulation. We also find that common institutional ownership can significantly reduce corporate leverage manipulation by improving internal capital management capabilities and external audit environment. At the same time, we find that the synergistic governance effect of common institutional equity has heterogeneity in the aspects of capacity utilization rate, equity nature, leverage manipulation motivation, and macro industry environment. These conclusions collectively highlight the important role of institutional cross-holdings in enhancing internal management levels and facilitating information transmission within the same industry. They also demonstrate that, under circumstances where internal agency problems are prominent, financial stress is high, and external risks are increasing, institutional cross-holdings play a supervisory and mitigating role in corporate financial management. This can not only contribute to the existing literature on the factors that positively constrain corporate leverage manipulation and the economic implications of common institutional ownership, but also has implications for how to enhance corporate governance and promote high-quality economic development in China’s context.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiqi Liu & Xiaoyu Wang & Cong Li & Yuchen Zhang, 2024. "Financial Modeling of Common Institutional Ownership’s Governance Effect on Corporate Leverage Manipulation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:93-:d:1555840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/93/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/1/93/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Jie (Jack) & Huang, Jiekun & Zhao, Shan, 2019. "Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 400-418.
    2. Marcus Miller & Joseph Stiglitz, 2010. "Leverage and Asset Bubbles: Averting Armageddon with Chapter 11?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(544), pages 500-518, May.
    3. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    4. Kang, Jun-Koo & Luo, Juan & Na, Hyun Seung, 2018. "Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 576-602.
    5. Li, Cong & Wang, Yiming & Sun, Weiguo & Yu, Yue & Ding, Yuzhen, 2024. "Green credit policy and corporate deleveraging: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Koch, Andrew & Panayides, Marios & Thomas, Shawn, 2021. "Common ownership and competition in product markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 109-137.
    7. Harry DeAngelo & Andrei S Gonçalves & René M Stulz, 2018. "Corporate Deleveraging and Financial Flexibility," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(8), pages 3122-3174.
    8. Li, Cong & Liu, Jiaxuan & Liu, Yuwei & Wang, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Can digitalization empowerment improve the efficiency of corporate capital allocation? —Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1794-1810.
    9. Patrick Dennis & Kristopher Gerardi & Carola Schenone, 2022. "Common Ownership Does Not Have Anticompetitive Effects in the Airline Industry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(5), pages 2765-2798, October.
    10. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:19-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Zhu, Ruoyu & Xin, Xiaohui & Tan, Kehu, 2024. "Reverse mixed ownership reform: Does state-owned capital injection inhibit corporate leverage manipulation?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shenglan & Ma, Hui & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2023. "Does common ownership constrain managerial rent extraction? Evidence from insider trading profitability," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Banal-Estanol, Albert & Seldeslachts, Jo & Vives, Xavier, 2022. "Ownership Diversification and Product Market Pricing Incentives," CEPR Discussion Papers 17686, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Gibbon, Alexandra J. & Schain, Jan Philip, 2023. "Rising markups, common ownership, and technological capacities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Hamza Nizar & Taher Hamza & Faten Lakhal, 2024. "How does institutional cross‐ownership affect firm productivity? The importance of the corporate social responsibility channel," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1988-2010, April.
    5. Tang, Xudong & Jia, Yang & Li, Rui, 2024. "Common institutional ownership types and corporate innovation: A taxonomy based on whether the investees are in the same industry," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Chen, Yangyang & Li, Qingyuan & Ng, Jeffrey & Wang, Chong, 2021. "Corporate financing of investment opportunities in a world of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Yishan Liu & Xingao Xu & Hongbo Hai & Hadi Hussain, 2025. "Does Shared Institutional Equity Enhance Corporate Eco-Transparency Reporting? Evidence from Firm Life Cycles Stages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-36, January.
    8. Ziwei Wang & Chunfeng Wang & Zhenming Fang, 2023. "Common institutional ownership and corporate misconduct," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 102-136, January.
    9. Xiaohui Wu & Yumin Li & Chong Feng, 2023. "Green innovation peer effects in common institutional ownership networks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 641-660, March.
    10. Xu, Tianli & Xu, Longbing & Zhu, Siyuan, 2023. "Common ownership and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Ziwei Wang & Chunfeng Wang & Zhenming Fang, 2024. "Learning from Failures of Co-owned Firms: Common Ownership and Information Disclosure Fraud," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 95-119, November.
    12. Wang, Shuangjin & Zhang, Xiaoqian & Cebula, Richard J. & Foley, Maggie, 2024. "Cross-shareholding, Managerial capabilities, and Strategic risk-taking in enterprises: A game or a win-win?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    13. Hennig, Jan C. & Oehmichen, Jana & Steinberg, Philip J. & Heigermoser, Judith, 2022. "Determinants of common ownership: Exploring an information-based and a competition-based perspective in a global context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 690-702.
    14. Fengguang Lyu & Zhiping Zhang & Guangxin Fu & Zhangxin (Frank) Liu & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2024. "Multiple shareholding institutional investors and green governance of heavy‐polluting industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3569-3587, May.
    15. Maria Goranova & Lori Verstegen Ryan, 2022. "The Corporate Objective Revisited: The Shareholder Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 526-554, March.
    16. Trinh, Quoc Dat & Haddad, Christian & Salameh, Elie, 2023. "Financial institutional blockholders and earnings quality: Do blockholders contestability and countries' institutions matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Ramzi Benkraiem & Taher Hamza & Faten Lakhal & Hamza Nizar, 2022. "Family control, institutional cross holding and corporate social responsibility," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(4), pages 2231-2247.
    18. Lin, Luca Xianran, 2022. "Great Trees are Good for Shade: Creditor Monitoring Under Common Ownership," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    19. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Xiaohui (Fiona) Li & Jing Xie & Yuxiang Zhong, 2023. "Accounting conservatism and common ownership by dedicated institutional blockholders," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(9-10), pages 1943-1983, October.
    20. D’Mello, Ranjan & Gruskin, Mark, 2021. "To be or not to be all-equity for firms that eliminate long-term debt," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 183-206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:93-:d:1555840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.