IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i8p1233-d1378959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Forecasting of Systemic Risk: A Vine Copula Grouped-CoES Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Huiting Duan

    (College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jinghu Yu

    (College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Linxiao Wei

    (College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Measuring systemic risk plays an important role in financial risk management to control systemic risk. By means of a vine copula grouped-CoES method, this paper aims to measure the systemic risk of Chinese financial markets. The empirical study indicates that the banking industry has a low risk and a strong ability to resist risks, but also contributes the most of the systemic risk. On the other hand, insurance companies and securities have high ES but low Δ CoES, indicating their low risk tolerance and small contribution to the systemic risk. Furthermore, this study employs a sliding window in Monte Carlo simulation to forecast systemic risk. The findings of this paper suggest that different types of financial industries should adopt different systemic risk measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiting Duan & Jinghu Yu & Linxiao Wei, 2024. "Measurement and Forecasting of Systemic Risk: A Vine Copula Grouped-CoES Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1233-:d:1378959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frittelli, Marco & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2002. "Putting order in risk measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1473-1486, July.
    2. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Arreola-Hernandez, Jose & Bekiros, Stelios & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Kayani, Ghulam Mujtaba, 2018. "A systemic risk analysis of Islamic equity markets using vine copula and delta CoVaR modeling," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 104-127.
    3. E. Kromer & L. Overbeck & K. Zilch, 2016. "Systemic risk measures on general measurable spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 323-357, October.
    4. Lamoureux, Christopher G & Lastrapes, William D, 1993. "Forecasting Stock-Return Variance: Toward an Understanding of Stochastic Implied Volatilities," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 293-326.
    5. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    6. Girardi, Giulio & Tolga Ergün, A., 2013. "Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3169-3180.
    7. Burgert, Christian & Ruschendorf, Ludger, 2006. "Consistent risk measures for portfolio vectors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 289-297, April.
    8. Chen Chen & Garud Iyengar & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2013. "An Axiomatic Approach to Systemic Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1373-1388, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Arduca & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2019. "Dual representations for systemic risk measures based on acceptance sets," Papers 1906.10933, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    2. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2021. "Backtesting Systemic Risk Forecasts using Multi-Objective Elicitability," Papers 2104.10673, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    3. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    4. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Olivier Scaillet, 2021. "Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5730-5754, September.
    5. Cosimo Munari & Stefan Weber & Lutz Wilhelmy, 2023. "Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 329-380, June.
    6. Timo Dimitriadis & Yannick Hoga, 2022. "Dynamic CoVaR Modeling and Estimation," Papers 2206.14275, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    7. Wang, Bo & Xiao, Yang, 2023. "Risk spillovers from China's and the US stock markets during high-volatility periods: Evidence from East Asianstock markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Yannick Armenti & Stéphane Crépey & Samuel Drapeau & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2018. "Multivariate Shortfall Risk Allocation and Systemic Risk," Working Papers hal-01764398, HAL.
    9. Takaaki Koike & Marius Hofert, 2020. "Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Estimating Systemic Risk Allocations," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, January.
    10. Alessandro Doldi & Marco Frittelli, 2020. "Conditional Systemic Risk Measures," Papers 2010.11515, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    11. Müller, Fernanda Maria & Santos, Samuel Solgon & Righi, Marcelo Brutti, 2023. "A description of the COVID-19 outbreak role in financial risk forecasting," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Faisal Alqahtani & Nader Trabelsi & Nahla Samargandi & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, 2020. "Tail Dependence and Risk Spillover from the US to GCC Banking Sectors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Takaaki Koike & Marius Hofert, 2019. "Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Estimating Systemic Risk Allocations," Papers 1909.11794, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    14. Lukas Gonon & Thilo Meyer-Brandis & Niklas Weber, 2024. "Computing Systemic Risk Measures with Graph Neural Networks," Papers 2410.07222, arXiv.org.
    15. E. Kromer & L. Overbeck & K. Zilch, 2019. "Dynamic systemic risk measures for bounded discrete time processes," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(1), pages 77-108, August.
    16. Dufour, Jean-Marie & García, René, 2008. "Measuring causality between volatility and returns with high-frequency data," UC3M Working papers. Economics we084422, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    17. Shuo Gong & Yijun Hu & Linxiao Wei, 2022. "On evaluation of joint risk for non-negative multivariate risks under dependence uncertainty," Papers 2212.04848, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    18. Reboredo, Juan C. & Ugolini, Andrea, 2015. "A vine-copula conditional value-at-risk approach to systemic sovereign debt risk for the financial sector," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 98-123.
    19. Warshaw, Evan, 2019. "Extreme dependence and risk spillovers across north american equity markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 237-251.
    20. c{C}au{g}{i}n Ararat & Birgit Rudloff, 2016. "Dual representations for systemic risk measures," Papers 1607.03430, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1233-:d:1378959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.