IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i8p1233-d1378959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and Forecasting of Systemic Risk: A Vine Copula Grouped-CoES Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Huiting Duan

    (College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jinghu Yu

    (College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Linxiao Wei

    (College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Measuring systemic risk plays an important role in financial risk management to control systemic risk. By means of a vine copula grouped-CoES method, this paper aims to measure the systemic risk of Chinese financial markets. The empirical study indicates that the banking industry has a low risk and a strong ability to resist risks, but also contributes the most of the systemic risk. On the other hand, insurance companies and securities have high ES but low Δ CoES, indicating their low risk tolerance and small contribution to the systemic risk. Furthermore, this study employs a sliding window in Monte Carlo simulation to forecast systemic risk. The findings of this paper suggest that different types of financial industries should adopt different systemic risk measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiting Duan & Jinghu Yu & Linxiao Wei, 2024. "Measurement and Forecasting of Systemic Risk: A Vine Copula Grouped-CoES Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1233-:d:1378959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/8/1233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frittelli, Marco & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2002. "Putting order in risk measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1473-1486, July.
    2. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    3. Burgert, Christian & Ruschendorf, Ludger, 2006. "Consistent risk measures for portfolio vectors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 289-297, April.
    4. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Arreola-Hernandez, Jose & Bekiros, Stelios & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Kayani, Ghulam Mujtaba, 2018. "A systemic risk analysis of Islamic equity markets using vine copula and delta CoVaR modeling," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 104-127.
    5. E. Kromer & L. Overbeck & K. Zilch, 2016. "Systemic risk measures on general measurable spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 323-357, October.
    6. Lamoureux, Christopher G & Lastrapes, William D, 1993. "Forecasting Stock-Return Variance: Toward an Understanding of Stochastic Implied Volatilities," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 293-326.
    7. Chen Chen & Garud Iyengar & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2013. "An Axiomatic Approach to Systemic Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1373-1388, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Arduca & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2019. "Dual representations for systemic risk measures based on acceptance sets," Papers 1906.10933, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    2. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    3. Cosimo Munari & Stefan Weber & Lutz Wilhelmy, 2023. "Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 329-380, June.
    4. Yannick Armenti & Stéphane Crépey & Samuel Drapeau & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2018. "Multivariate Shortfall Risk Allocation and Systemic Risk," Working Papers hal-01764398, HAL.
    5. Alessandro Doldi & Marco Frittelli, 2020. "Conditional Systemic Risk Measures," Papers 2010.11515, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    6. Müller, Fernanda Maria & Santos, Samuel Solgon & Righi, Marcelo Brutti, 2023. "A description of the COVID-19 outbreak role in financial risk forecasting," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Lukas Gonon & Thilo Meyer-Brandis & Niklas Weber, 2024. "Computing Systemic Risk Measures with Graph Neural Networks," Papers 2410.07222, arXiv.org.
    8. E. Kromer & L. Overbeck & K. Zilch, 2019. "Dynamic systemic risk measures for bounded discrete time processes," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(1), pages 77-108, August.
    9. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2021. "Backtesting Systemic Risk Forecasts using Multi-Objective Elicitability," Papers 2104.10673, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    10. Dufour, Jean-Marie & García, René, 2008. "Measuring causality between volatility and returns with high-frequency data," UC3M Working papers. Economics we084422, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    11. Shuo Gong & Yijun Hu & Linxiao Wei, 2022. "Risk measurement of joint risk of portfolios: a liquidity shortfall aspect," Papers 2212.04848, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    12. Denisa Banulescu-Radu & Christophe Hurlin & Jérémy Leymarie & Olivier Scaillet, 2021. "Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5730-5754, September.
    13. c{C}au{g}{i}n Ararat & Birgit Rudloff, 2016. "Dual representations for systemic risk measures," Papers 1607.03430, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    14. Wang, Wei & Xu, Huifu & Ma, Tiejun, 2023. "Optimal scenario-dependent multivariate shortfall risk measure and its application in risk capital allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 322-347.
    15. Chiang, Min-Hsien & Huang, Hsin-Yi, 2011. "Stock market momentum, business conditions, and GARCH option pricing models," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 488-505, June.
    16. Francesca Biagini & Andrea Mazzon & Thilo Meyer-Brandis, 2018. "Financial asset bubbles in banking networks," Papers 1806.01728, arXiv.org.
    17. Issler, João Victor, 1999. "Estimating and forecasting the volatility of Brazilian finance series using arch models (Preliminary Version)," FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE) 347, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil).
    18. Min Liu & Chien‐Chiang Lee & Wei‐Chong Choo, 2021. "An empirical study on the role of trading volume and data frequency in volatility forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(5), pages 792-816, August.
    19. Choi, Jaewon & Richardson, Matthew, 2016. "The volatility of a firm's assets and the leverage effect," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 254-277.
    20. Taylor, Stephen J. & Yadav, Pradeep K. & Zhang, Yuanyuan, 2009. "The information content of implied volatilities and model-free volatility expectations: Evidence from options written on individual stocks," CFR Working Papers 09-07, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:8:p:1233-:d:1378959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.