IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i24p3914-d1541792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Model and Pattern of Community Opinion Dis-Semination Regarding Coal Mines

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Yu

    (College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Zhaoxiang Mu

    (College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

  • Jifeng Lu

    (College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

Residents of coal mining communities include both coal mine workers and local residents, making the guidance of public opinion essential for maintaining social stability in such communities. Therefore, this paper utilizes an improved word2Vec model to extract factors influencing public opinion from a large number of accident cases. It then develops a coal mining community public opinion dissemination model based on game theory, focusing on two groups: official media and opinion leaders. By integrating cellular automata (CA) and agent-based modeling, this study examines the dissemination patterns of public opinion in coal mining communities. The simulation results and practical applications indicate that public opinion in coal mining communities spreads rapidly and can be effectively shaped. Positive guidance from official media plays a crucial role in directing public opinion. However, as interactions evolve, public opinion dynamics may become less favorable. Strengthening the intensity of positive guidance from official media further enhances its ability to shape and influence public opinion in coal mining communities. This research provides a novel perspective and methodology for studying community safety management, offering significant theoretical and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Yu & Zhaoxiang Mu & Jifeng Lu, 2024. "Research on the Model and Pattern of Community Opinion Dis-Semination Regarding Coal Mines," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3914-:d:1541792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/24/3914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salimian, Sattar & Mamipour, Siab & Salimian, Salah, 2023. "Modeling the exploitation of common oil and gas resources under different conditions of resource distribution and extraction power: A game theory approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Takasumi Kurahashi-Nakamura & Michael Mäs & Jan Lorenz, 2016. "Robust Clustering in Generalized Bounded Confidence Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 19(4), pages 1-7.
    3. Anselm Hager & Hanno Hilbig, 2020. "Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 921-937, October.
    4. Hussein A. Alsaeedi & Ahmed S. Alhegami & Atila Bueno, 2022. "An Incremental Interesting Maximal Frequent Itemset Mining Based on FP-Growth Algorithm," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-20, July.
    5. Hager, Anselm & Hilbig, Hanno, 2020. "Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 64(4), pages 921-937.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: Evidence from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Bellani, Luna & Berriochoa, Kattalina & Kapteina, Mark & Schwerdt, Guido, 2024. "Information Provision and Support for Inheritance Taxation: Evidence from a Representative Survey Experiment in Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 17099, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Lergetporer, P & Woessmann, L, 2022. "Income Contingency and the Electorates Support for Tuition," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 606, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2023. "Earnings information and public preferences for university tuition: Evidence from representative experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Mierisch, Fabian & Schwerdt, Guido & Wiederhold, Simon, 2024. "Does Information about Inequality and Discrimination in Early Child Care Affect Policy Preferences?," IZA Discussion Papers 16759, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Mierisch, Fabian & Schwerdt, Guido & Wiederhold, Simon, 2024. "Information about inequality in early child care reduces polarization in policy preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Angerer, Silvia & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Lergetporer, Philipp & Rittmannsberger, Thomas, 2023. "How does the vaccine approval procedure affect COVID-19 vaccination intentions?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Kruse, Tobias & Atkinson, Giles, 2022. "Understanding public support for international climate adaptation payments: evidence from a choice experiment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112963, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Mierisch, Fabian & Schwerdt, Guido & Wiederhold, Simon, 2024. "Does Information about Inequality and Discrimination in Early Child Care Affect Policy Preferences?," IZA Discussion Papers 16759, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Habibu Rahman Rahmani & Abdul Rahman Saeed, 2024. "The Power of Language: Exploring the Role of Language in Politics," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 2063-2073, August.
    11. Simon D Angus, 2024. "Tracking Policy-relevant Narratives of Democratic Resilience at Scale: from experts and machines, to AI & the transformer revolution," SoDa Laboratories Working Paper Series 2024-07, Monash University, SoDa Laboratories.
    12. Joshua Alley, 2023. "Elite Cues and Public Attitudes Towards Military Alliances," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(7-8), pages 1537-1563, August.
    13. Lipiecki, Arkadiusz & Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna, 2022. "Polarization in the three-state q-voter model with anticonformity and bounded confidence," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    14. Weimer, Christopher W. & Miller, J.O. & Hill, Raymond R. & Hodson, Douglas D., 2022. "An opinion dynamics model of meta-contrast with continuous social influence forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 589(C).
    15. Baumann, Fabian & Sokolov, Igor M. & Tyloo, Melvyn, 2020. "A Laplacian approach to stubborn agents and their role in opinion formation on influence networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).
    16. Takesue, Hirofumi, 2023. "Relative opinion similarity leads to the emergence of large clusters in opinion formation models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 622(C).
    17. Christos Mavridis & Nikolas Tsakas, 2021. "Social Capital, Communication Channels and Opinion Formation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 635-678, May.
    18. Thomas Feliciani & Andreas Flache & Michael Mäs, 2021. "Persuasion without polarization? Modelling persuasive argument communication in teams with strong faultlines," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-92, March.
    19. Francisco J. León-Medina & Jordi Tena-Sánchez & Francisco J. Miguel, 2020. "Fakers becoming believers: how opinion dynamics are shaped by preference falsification, impression management and coherence heuristics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 385-412, April.
    20. Khalil, Nagi, 2021. "Approach to consensus in models of continuous-opinion dynamics: A study inspired by the physics of granular gases," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:24:p:3914-:d:1541792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.