Polarization in the three-state q-voter model with anticonformity and bounded confidence
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112809
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2020.
"Anti-conformism in the Threshold Model of Collective Behavior,"
Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 444-477, June.
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2019. "Anti-conformism in the threshold model of collective behavior," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 19016, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2019. "Anti-conformism in the threshold model of collective behavior," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02379613, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2019. "Anti-conformism in the threshold model of collective behavior," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02379613, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2019. "Anti-conformism in the threshold model of collective behavior," Post-Print halshs-02337374, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2019. "Anti-conformism in the threshold model of collective behavior," Post-Print halshs-02379613, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Fen Li, 2019. "Anti-conformism in the threshold model of collective behavior," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02337374, HAL.
- Rainer Hegselmann & Ulrich Krause, 2002. "Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis and Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5(3), pages 1-2.
- Guillaume Deffuant & Frederic Amblard & Gérard Weisbuch, 2002. "How Can Extremism Prevail? a Study Based on the Relative Agreement Interaction Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5(4), pages 1-1.
- Takasumi Kurahashi-Nakamura & Michael Mäs & Jan Lorenz, 2016. "Robust Clustering in Generalized Bounded Confidence Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 19(4), pages 1-7.
- Pablo Balenzuela & Juan Pablo Pinasco & Viktoriya Semeshenko, 2015. "The Undecided Have the Key: Interaction-Driven Opinion Dynamics in a Three State Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
- Hans-Ulrich Stark & Claudio J. Tessone & Frank Schweitzer, 2008. "Slower Is Faster: Fostering Consensus Formation By Heterogeneous Inertia," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 551-563.
- Andreas Flache & Michael Mäs & Thomas Feliciani & Edmund Chattoe-Brown & Guillaume Deffuant & Sylvie Huet & Jan Lorenz, 2017. "Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(4), pages 1-2.
- Antonio Parravano & Ascensión Andina-Díaz & Miguel A Meléndez-Jiménez, 2016. "Bounded Confidence under Preferential Flip: A Coupled Dynamics of Structural Balance and Opinions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
- Crokidakis, Nuno, 2014. "A three-state kinetic agent-based model to analyze tax evasion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 414(C), pages 321-328.
- Biswas, Soumyajyoti & Chatterjee, Arnab & Sen, Parongama, 2012. "Disorder induced phase transition in kinetic models of opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3257-3265.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Wu, Yujia & Guo, Peng, 2024. "Effects of relative homophily and relative heterophily on opinion dynamics in coevolving networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 644(C).
- Meng, Fanyuan & Zhu, Jiadong & Yao, Yuheng & Fenoaltea, Enrico Maria & Xie, Yubo & Yang, Pingle & Liu, Run-Ran & Zhang, Jianlin, 2023. "Disagreement and fragmentation in growing groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Weimer, Christopher W. & Miller, J.O. & Hill, Raymond R. & Hodson, Douglas D., 2022. "An opinion dynamics model of meta-contrast with continuous social influence forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 589(C).
- María Cecilia Gimenez & Luis Reinaudi & Ana Pamela Paz-García & Paulo Marcelo Centres & Antonio José Ramirez-Pastor, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the presence of constant propaganda: homogeneous and localized cases," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(1), pages 1-11, January.
- Sylvie Huet & Jean-Denis Mathias, 2018. "Few Self-Involved Agents Among Bounded Confidence Agents Can Change Norms," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06n07), pages 1-27, September.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020.
"A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics,"
Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-29, December.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03161820, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2021. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Post-Print halshs-03167886, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Post-Print halshs-03161820, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03161820, HAL.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2021. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 21005, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2021. "A Survey on Nonstrategic Models of Opinion Dynamics," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03167886, HAL.
- Bruce Edmonds, 2020. "Co-developing beliefs and social influence networks—towards understanding socio-cognitive processes like Brexit," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 491-515, April.
- Takesue, Hirofumi, 2023. "Relative opinion similarity leads to the emergence of large clusters in opinion formation models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 622(C).
- Gimenez, M. Cecilia & Paz García, Ana Pamela & Burgos Paci, Maxi A. & Reinaudi, Luis, 2016. "Range of interaction in an opinion evolution model of ideological self-positioning: Contagion, hesitance and polarization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 447(C), pages 320-330.
- Maciel, Marcelo V. & Martins, André C.R., 2020. "Ideologically motivated biases in a multiple issues opinion model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 553(C).
- Francisco J. León-Medina & Jordi Tena-Sánchez & Francisco J. Miguel, 2020. "Fakers becoming believers: how opinion dynamics are shaped by preference falsification, impression management and coherence heuristics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 385-412, April.
- Deffuant, Guillaume & Keijzer, Marijn & Banisch, Sven, 2023. "Regular access to constantly renewed online content favors radicalization of opinions," IAST Working Papers 23-154, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
- Khalil, Nagi, 2021. "Approach to consensus in models of continuous-opinion dynamics: A study inspired by the physics of granular gases," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
- Cui, Peng-Bi, 2023. "Exploring the foundation of social diversity and coherence with a novel attraction–repulsion model framework," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
- Pedraza, Lucía & Pinasco, Juan Pablo & Semeshenko, Viktoriya & Balenzuela, Pablo, 2023. "Mesoscopic analytical approach in a three state opinion model with continuous internal variable," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
- George Butler & Gabriella Pigozzi & Juliette Rouchier, 2019. "Mixing Dyadic and Deliberative Opinion Dynamics in an Agent-Based Model of Group Decision-Making," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-31, August.
- Guillaume Deffuant & Ilaria Bertazzi & Sylvie Huet, 2018. "The Dark Side Of Gossips: Hints From A Simple Opinion Dynamics Model," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06n07), pages 1-20, September.
- Schweitzer, Frank, 2021. "Social percolation revisited: From 2d lattices to adaptive networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 570(C).
- G Jordan Maclay & Moody Ahmad, 2021. "An agent based force vector model of social influence that predicts strong polarization in a connected world," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-42, November.
- Kononovicius, Aleksejus, 2021. "Supportive interactions in the noisy voter model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
- Song, Xiao & Shi, Wen & Tan, Gary & Ma, Yaofei, 2015. "Multi-level tolerance opinion dynamics in military command and control networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 322-332.
- Song, Xiao & Zhang, Shaoyun & Qian, Lidong, 2013. "Opinion dynamics in networked command and control organizations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 5206-5217.
More about this item
Keywords
Agent-based model; Discrete choice; Polarization; Opposing viewpoints; Bounded confidence; Voter model; Human resource management;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:165:y:2022:i:p1:s0960077922009882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.