IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i20p3201-d1497406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Graph-Refinement Algorithm to Minimize Squared Delivery Delays Using Parcel Robots

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Gnegel

    (Institute of Mathematics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Platz der Deutschen Einheit 1, 03046 Cottbus, Germany)

  • Stefan Schaudt

    (Institute of Transport Logistics, TU Dortmund University, Leonhard-Euler-Str. 2, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Uwe Clausen

    (Institute of Transport Logistics, TU Dortmund University, Leonhard-Euler-Str. 2, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Armin Fügenschuh

    (Institute of Mathematics, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Platz der Deutschen Einheit 1, 03046 Cottbus, Germany)

Abstract

In recent years, parcel volumes have reached record highs, prompting the logistics industry to explore innovative solutions to meet growing demand. In densely populated areas, delivery robots offer a promising alternative to traditional truck-based delivery systems. These autonomous electric robots operate on sidewalks and deliver time-sensitive goods, such as express parcels, medicine and meals. However, their limited cargo capacity and battery life require a return to a depot after each delivery. This challenge can be modeled as an electric vehicle-routing problem with soft time windows and single-unit capacity constraints. The objective is to serve all customers while minimizing the quadratic sum of delivery delays and ensuring each vehicle operates within its battery limitations. To address this problem, we propose a mixed-integer quadratic programming model and introduce an enhanced formulation using a layered graph structure. For this layered graph, we present two solution approaches based on relaxations that reduce the number of nodes and arcs compared to the expanded formulation. The first approach, Iterative Refinement, solves the current relaxation to optimality and refines the graph when the solution is infeasible for the expanded formulation. This process continues until a proven optimal solution is obtained. The second approach, Branch and Refine, integrates graph refinement into a branch-and-bound framework, eliminating the need for restarts. Computational experiments on modified Solomon instances demonstrate the effectiveness of our solution approaches, with Branch and Refine consistently outperforming Iterative Refinement across all tested parameter configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Gnegel & Stefan Schaudt & Uwe Clausen & Armin Fügenschuh, 2024. "A Graph-Refinement Algorithm to Minimize Squared Delivery Delays Using Parcel Robots," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:20:p:3201-:d:1497406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/20/3201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natashia Boland & Mike Hewitt & Luke Marshall & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "The Continuous-Time Service Network Design Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1303-1321, October.
    2. Boysen, Nils & Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Weidinger, Felix, 2018. "Scheduling last-mile deliveries with truck-based autonomous robots," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 126189, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Guy Desaulniers & Fausto Errico & Stefan Irnich & Michael Schneider, 2016. "Exact Algorithms for Electric Vehicle-Routing Problems with Time Windows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1388-1405, December.
    4. Marius M. Solomon, 1987. "Algorithms for the Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problems with Time Window Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 254-265, April.
    5. Boysen, Nils & Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Weidinger, Felix, 2018. "Scheduling last-mile deliveries with truck-based autonomous robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1085-1099.
    6. Michael Schneider & Andreas Stenger & Dominik Goeke, 2014. "The Electric Vehicle-Routing Problem with Time Windows and Recharging Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 500-520, November.
    7. Wang, Zheng & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Vehicle routing problem with drones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 350-364.
    8. Schneider, M. & Stenger, A. & Goeke, D., 2014. "The Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows and Recharging Stations," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 62382, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Themistoklis Stamadianos & Nikolaos A. Kyriakakis & Magdalene Marinaki & Yannis Marinakis, 2023. "Routing Problems with Electric and Autonomous Vehicles: Review and Potential for Future Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-34, June.
    2. Pottel, Steffen & Goel, Asvin, 2022. "Scheduling activities with time-dependent durations and resource consumptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 445-457.
    3. Tengkuo Zhu & Stephen D. Boyles & Avinash Unnikrishnan, 2024. "Battery Electric Vehicle Traveling Salesman Problem with Drone," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-97, March.
    4. Raeesi, Ramin & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2020. "The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and synchronised mobile battery swapping," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 101-129.
    5. Cortés-Murcia, David L. & Prodhon, Caroline & Murat Afsar, H., 2019. "The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows, partial recharges and satellite customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 184-206.
    6. Maximilian Schiffer & Michael Schneider & Grit Walther & Gilbert Laporte, 2019. "Vehicle Routing and Location Routing with Intermediate Stops: A Review," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 319-343, March.
    7. Raeesi, Ramin & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2022. "Coordinated routing of electric commercial vehicles with intra-route recharging and en-route battery swapping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 82-109.
    8. Liu, Dan & Yan, Pengyu & Pu, Ziyuan & Wang, Yinhai & Kaisar, Evangelos I., 2021. "Hybrid artificial immune algorithm for optimizing a Van-Robot E-grocery delivery system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Dönmez, Sercan & Koç, Çağrı & Altıparmak, Fulya, 2022. "The mixed fleet vehicle routing problem with partial recharging by multiple chargers: Mathematical model and adaptive large neighborhood search," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Sadati, Mir Ehsan Hesam & Çatay, Bülent, 2021. "A hybrid variable neighborhood search approach for the multi-depot green vehicle routing problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan & Qiu, Rongzu, 2021. "The adoption of self-driving delivery robots in last mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Erfan Ghorbani & Mahdi Alinaghian & Gevork. B. Gharehpetian & Sajad Mohammadi & Guido Perboli, 2020. "A Survey on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle Routing Problem and a Proposal of Its Classification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-71, October.
    13. Schiffer, Maximilian & Walther, Grit, 2017. "The electric location routing problem with time windows and partial recharging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 995-1013.
    14. Schiffer, Maximilian & Walther, Grit, 2018. "Strategic planning of electric logistics fleet networks: A robust location-routing approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 31-42.
    15. Xiao, Yiyong & Zhang, Yue & Kaku, Ikou & Kang, Rui & Pan, Xing, 2021. "Electric vehicle routing problem: A systematic review and a new comprehensive model with nonlinear energy recharging and consumption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Zhou, Hang & Qin, Hu & Cheng, Chun & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2023. "An exact algorithm for the two-echelon vehicle routing problem with drones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 124-150.
    17. Qiuping Ni & Yuanxiang Tang, 2023. "A Bibliometric Visualized Analysis and Classification of Vehicle Routing Problem Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-37, April.
    18. Christian Tilk & Ann-Kathrin Rothenbächer & Timo Gschwind & Stefan Irnich, 2016. "Asymmetry Helps: Dynamic Half-Way Points for Solving Shortest Path Problems with Resource Constraints Faster," Working Papers 1615, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    19. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan, 2021. "An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with time windows and delivery robots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1164-1180.
    20. Tilk, Christian & Rothenbächer, Ann-Kathrin & Gschwind, Timo & Irnich, Stefan, 2017. "Asymmetry matters: Dynamic half-way points in bidirectional labeling for solving shortest path problems with resource constraints faster," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 530-539.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:20:p:3201-:d:1497406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.