IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i17p2650-d1464455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staged Resource Allocation Optimization under Heterogeneous Grouping Based on Interval Data: The Case of China’s Forest Carbon Sequestration

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Wu

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Mengjiao Zhang

    (College of Digital Economy, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Yan Huang

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Jiawei Wang

    (College of Rural Revitalization Academy, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

In interval data envelopment analysis (DEA), the production possibility set is variable, which causes traditional resource allocation optimization methods to yield results with limited reachability. This study aims to improve existing resource allocation optimization models so that they can produce meaningful results when handling interval data. Addressing this topic can enhance the applicability of existing models and improve decision-making accuracy. We grouped decision-making units (DMUs) based on heterogeneity to form production possibility sets. We then considered the characteristics of the worst and best production possibility sets in the interval DEA to establish multiple benchmark fronts. A staged optimization procedure is proposed; the procedure provides a continuous optimization solution, offering a basis for decision-makers to formulate strategies. To illustrate this, we provide a numerical example analysis and a case study on forest carbon sequestration. Finally, by applying our method to China’s forest carbon sink data, we show that it better meets the practical needs in China. The practical implication of this procedure is that it provides a basis for decision makers to formulate strategies based on interval data. The theoretical implication is that it extends the application of DEA models to interval data.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Wu & Mengjiao Zhang & Yan Huang & Jiawei Wang, 2024. "Staged Resource Allocation Optimization under Heterogeneous Grouping Based on Interval Data: The Case of China’s Forest Carbon Sequestration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:17:p:2650-:d:1464455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/17/2650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/17/2650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walheer, Barnabé, 2023. "Meta-frontier and technology switchers: A nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 463-474.
    2. Das, Gouranga G. & Drine, Imed, 2020. "Distance from the technology frontier: How could Africa catch-up via socio-institutional factors and human capital?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Ruiz, José L. & Segura, José V. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2015. "Benchmarking and target setting with expert preferences: An application to the evaluation of educational performance of Spanish universities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 594-605.
    5. Wang, Miao & Wu, Yi & Zhang, Xinmin & Lei, Lei, 2024. "How does industrial agglomeration affect internal structures of green economy in China? An analysis based on a three-hierarchy meta-frontier DEA and systematic GMM approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Sebastián Lozano & Narges Soltani, 2020. "A modified discrete Raiffa approach for efficiency assessment and target setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 71-95, September.
    7. Sebastián Lozano & Gabriel Villa, 2010. "Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 123-136, January.
    8. Jie Wu & Jun-Fei Chu & Liang Liang, 2016. "Target setting and allocation of carbon emissions abatement based on DEA and closest target: an application to 20 APEC economies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 279-296, November.
    9. Lim, Sungmook & Zhu, Joe, 2019. "Primal-dual correspondence and frontier projections in two-stage network DEA models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 236-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Junfei & Wu, Jie & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Tinglong, 2020. "DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: Leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Konstantinos Petridis & Alexander Chatzigeorgiou & Emmanouil Stiakakis, 2016. "A spatiotemporal Data Envelopment Analysis (S-T DEA) approach: the need to assess evolving units," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 475-496, March.
    4. Ding, Tao & Zhang, Yun & Zhang, Danlu & Li, Feng, 2023. "Performance evaluation of Chinese research universities: A parallel interactive network DEA approach with shared and fixed sum inputs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    5. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    6. Cook, Wade D. & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada & Zhu, Joe, 2017. "Within-group common benchmarking using DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 901-910.
    7. Alireza Moradi & Saber Saati & Mehrzad Navabakhsh, 2023. "Genetic algorithms for optimizing two-stage DEA by considering unequal intermediate weights," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(3), pages 1202-1217, September.
    8. Liu, Xing & Wu, Xianhua & Zhang, Weipan, 2024. "A new DEA model and its application in performance evaluation of scientific research activities in the universities of China's double first-class initiative," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "A maximum slacks-based measure of efficiency for closed series production systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "Closest targets in the slacks-based measure of efficiency for production units with multi-period data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1042-1054.
    11. Barnabe Walheer, 2024. "Meta-frontier: literature review and toolkit," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Tavares, Rafael Santos & Angulo-Meza, Lidia & Sant'Anna, Annibal Parracho, 2021. "A proposed multistage evaluation approach for Higher Education Institutions based on network Data envelopment analysis: A Brazilian experience," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Ji, Zhiyong & Wu, Xianhua & Chen, Xueli & Zhou, Wenzhuo & Song, Malin, 2023. "Finding green performance targets globally closest to management goals for ports experiencing similar circumstances," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    14. Walheer, Barnabé, 2023. "Meta-frontier and technology switchers: A nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 463-474.
    15. Dan Li & Yanfeng Li & Yeming Gong & Jiawei Yang, 2021. "Estimation of bank performance from multiple perspectives: an alternative solution to the deposit dilemma," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 151-170, December.
    16. Nafiseh Javaherian & Ali Hamzehee & Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo, 2021. "A compositional approach to two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 21-39.
    17. Konstantinos Petridis & Alexander Chatzigeorgiou & Emmanouil Stiakakis, 2016. "A spatiotemporal Data Envelopment Analysis (S-T DEA) approach: the need to assess evolving units," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 475-496, March.
    18. Xiangrui Chao & Yucheng Dong & Gang Kou & Yi Peng, 2022. "How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: a method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 143-177, September.
    19. Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2019. "Performance evaluation through DEA benchmarking adjusted to goals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 150-157.
    20. Yang, Guo-liang & Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Song, Yao-yao, 2018. "Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 10-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:17:p:2650-:d:1464455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.