IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i13p2040-d1426150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Factors Analysis in Railway Engineering Technological Innovation under Complex and Difficult Areas: A System Dynamics Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chaoxun Cai

    (Postgraduate Department, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    State Key Laboratory for Track Technology of High-Speed Railway, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China
    Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Shiyu Tian

    (School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)

  • Yuefeng Shi

    (Postgraduate Department, China Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    State Key Laboratory for Track Technology of High-Speed Railway, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China
    Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yongjun Chen

    (School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)

  • Xiaojian Li

    (School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)

Abstract

The geological complexity, environmental sensitivity, and ecological fragility inherent in complex and difficult areas (CDAs) present new opportunities and challenges for technological innovation in railway engineering development in China. At the current stage in China, the process of technological innovation in railway engineering within CDAs still faces a series of pressing issues that need addressing. The paper identifies and determines 22 influencing factors for technological innovation in railway engineering within CDAs across five dimensions. Subsequently, a technological innovation model for railway engineering in such areas is constructed based on system dynamics (SD), which is followed by simulation and sensitivity analysis to identify the key influencing factors. The results indicate that key influencing factors for technological innovation in railway engineering within CDAs include technological innovation capability, the adaptability of technology to the environment, R&D funding investment, technological product requirements, technological innovation incentive mechanisms, and the level of technological development. The importance ranking of each dimension is as follows: technological factors > technical factors > management factors > resource factors > environmental factors. The paper provides new insights for promoting technological innovation and management development in complex and challenging railway engineering projects. It offers a fresh perspective to enhance the technological innovation efficiency of railway projects in complex and challenging areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaoxun Cai & Shiyu Tian & Yuefeng Shi & Yongjun Chen & Xiaojian Li, 2024. "Influencing Factors Analysis in Railway Engineering Technological Innovation under Complex and Difficult Areas: A System Dynamics Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:2040-:d:1426150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/2040/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/2040/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morcillo, José D. & Franco, Carlos J. & Angulo, Fabiola, 2018. "Simulation of demand growth scenarios in the Colombian electricity market: An integration of system dynamics and dynamic systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 504-520.
    2. Yongjun Chen & Xiaojian Li & Jin Wang & Mei Liu & Chaoxun Cai & Yuefeng Shi, 2023. "Research on the Application of Fuzzy Bayesian Network in Risk Assessment of Catenary Construction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Agnieszka Leśniak & Filip Janowiec, 2019. "Risk Assessment of Additional Works in Railway Construction Investments Using the Bayes Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Liu, Jintao & Schmid, Felix & Li, Keping & Zheng, Wei, 2021. "A knowledge graph-based approach for exploring railway operational accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Zibiao Li & Han Li & Siwei Wang, 2022. "How Multidimensional Digital Empowerment Affects Technology Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Adaptability to Technology Embedding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Guiyu Bai & Wenjuan Wang & Xinxin Wang, 2022. "Research on the Influence of Technological Innovation Enthusiasm on Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Nonlinearity—Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Bombelli, Alessandro & Santos, Bruno F. & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2020. "Analysis of the air cargo transport network using a complex network theory perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Borgonovo, E. & Cappelli, V. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M., 2018. "Risk analysis and decision theory: A bridge," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 280-293.
    9. Lee, Chien-Chiang & He, Zhi-Wen & Xiao, Fu, 2022. "How does information and communication technology affect renewable energy technology innovation? International evidence," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 546-557.
    10. Xulong Dai, 2022. "Supply Chain Relationship Quality and Corporate Technological Innovations: A Multimethod Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Nahavandi, Nasim, 2021. "A system dynamics model to analyze future electricity supply and demand in Iran under alternative pricing policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Liu, Xiao-xiao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Aggregating the DEA prospect cross-efficiency with an application to state key laboratories in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Cyfert, Szymon & Malewska, Kamila & Mierzejewska, Katarzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2023. "The impact of resources on digital transformation in energy sector companies. The role of readiness for digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Qiu, Lei & Wang, Xiaoyang & Wei, Jia, 2023. "Energy security and energy management: The role of extreme natural events," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(2).
    5. Agnieszka Bekisz & Magdalena Kowacka & Michał Kruszyński & Dominika Dudziak-Gajowiak & Grzegorz Debita, 2022. "Risk Management Using Network Thinking Methodology on the Example of Rail Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    7. Dindar, Serdar & Kaewunruen, Sakdirat & An, Min, 2022. "A hierarchical Bayesian-based model for hazard analysis of climate effect on failures of railway turnout components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    8. Yun, Na, 2024. "Resources curse via natural resources utilization: Linking digitalization and resources markets for economy perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Ding, Qian & Huang, Jianbai & Chen, Jinyu & Tao, Dali, 2023. "Internet development and renewable energy technological innovation: Does institutional quality matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. José D. Morcillo & Fabiola Angulo & Carlos J. Franco, 2020. "Analyzing the Hydroelectricity Variability on Power Markets from a System Dynamics and Dynamic Systems Perspective: Seasonality and ENSO Phenomenon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chang-song, 2022. "Does natural resources matter for sustainable energy development in China: The role of technological progress," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Shi, Hai-Liu & Chen, Sheng-Qun & Chen, Lei & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2021. "A neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method based on interval reference points in consideration of bounded rational behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1098-1110.
    13. Becerra-Fernandez, Mauricio & Sarmiento, Alfonso T. & Cardenas, Laura M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of the solar energy supply chain in Colombia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Güner, Samet & Antunes, Jorge Junio Moreira & Seçkin Codal, Keziban & Wanke, Peter, 2024. "Network centrality driven airport efficiency: A weight-restricted network DEA," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Zhu, Chen & Jin, Zhuo & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "The impact of informal care from children to their elderly parents on self-employment? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Zhu, Bo & Deng, Yuanyue & Hu, Xin, 2023. "Global energy security: Do internal and external risk spillovers matter? A multilayer network method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Tian, Jinfang & Sun, Siyang & Cao, Wei & Bu, Di & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Make every dollar count: The impact of green credit regulation on corporate green investment efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Thakur, Jagruti & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza & Date, Paresh & Bunn, Derek, 2023. "Pricing and hedging wind power prediction risk with binary option contracts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Lawford, Steve & Mehmeti, Yll, 2020. "Cliques and a new measure of clustering: With application to U.S. domestic airlines," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    20. Yangjie Huang & Sihui Li & Xiyuan Xiang & Leilei Huang, 2024. "Analyzing the configuration of the National Innovation System for Innovation Capability: evidence from Global Innovation Index reports," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:2040-:d:1426150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.