IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i13p1978-d1422948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mathematical Model for Integrated Disaster Relief Operations in Early-Stage Flood Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Insani

    (School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
    Mathematics Education Department, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia)

  • Sona Taheri

    (School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Mali Abdollahian

    (School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

When a flood strikes, the two most critical tasks are evacuation and relief distribution. It is essential to integrate these tasks, particularly before the floodwater reaches the vulnerable area, to minimize loss and damage. This paper presents a mathematical model of vehicle routing problems to optimize an integrated disaster relief operation. The model addresses routing for both the evacuation and relief distribution tasks in the early stages of a flood, aiming to identify a minimal number of vehicles required with their corresponding routes to transport vulnerable individuals and simultaneously distribute emergency relief. The new model incorporates several features, including vehicle reuse, multi-trip and split delivery scenarios for evacuees and emergency relief items, uncertainty in evacuation demands, and closing time windows at evacuation points. Due to the complexity of vehicle routing problems, particularly in large-scale scenarios, the exact approach for obtaining optimal solutions is time-consuming. Therefore, we propose the use of a metaheuristic algorithm, specifically a modified genetic algorithm, to find an approximate solution for the proposed model. We apply the developed model and modified algorithm to various simulated flood scenarios and a real-life case study from Indonesia. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach requires fewer vehicles compared to standard models for similar scenarios. Moreover, while the exact approach fails to find optimal solutions within a reasonable timeframe for large-scale scenarios, our new approach provides near-optimal solutions in a much shorter time. In smaller simulated scenarios, the modified genetic algorithm obtains optimal or near-optimal solutions approximately 92.5% faster than the exact approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Insani & Sona Taheri & Mali Abdollahian, 2024. "A Mathematical Model for Integrated Disaster Relief Operations in Early-Stage Flood Scenarios," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:1978-:d:1422948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/1978/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/1978/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rawls, Carmen G. & Turnquist, Mark A., 2012. "Pre-positioning and dynamic delivery planning for short-term response following a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 46-54.
    2. Ahmadi, Morteza & Seifi, Abbas & Tootooni, Behnam, 2015. "A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief operation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco district," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-163.
    3. Tavana, Madjid & Abtahi, Amir-Reza & Di Caprio, Debora & Hashemi, Reza & Yousefi-Zenouz, Reza, 2018. "An integrated location-inventory-routing humanitarian supply chain network with pre- and post-disaster management considerations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 21-37.
    4. Muhammad Salman Habib & Young Hae Lee & Muhammad Saad Memon, 2016. "Mathematical Models in Humanitarian Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-20, February.
    5. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    6. Kangye Tan & Weihua Liu & Fang Xu & Chunsheng Li, 2023. "Optimization Model and Algorithm of Logistics Vehicle Routing Problem under Major Emergency," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Wang, Haijun & Du, Lijing & Ma, Shihua, 2014. "Multi-objective open location-routing model with split delivery for optimized relief distribution in post-earthquake," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 160-179.
    8. Kai Huang & Michael Xu, 2023. "Optimization Models for the Vehicle Routing Problem under Disruptions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamoud Bin Obaid & Theodore B. Trafalis & Mastoor M. Abushaega & Abdulhadi Altherwi & Ahmed Hamzi, 2024. "Optimizing Dynamic Evacuation Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    2. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.
    3. Xuehong Gao, 2022. "A bi-level stochastic optimization model for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in disaster response," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 115-148, December.
    4. Akbarpour, Mina & Ali Torabi, S. & Ghavamifar, Ali, 2020. "Designing an integrated pharmaceutical relief chain network under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    6. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    7. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Taheri-Moghaddam, Alireza, 2016. "An approximation approach to a trade-off among efficiency, efficacy, and balance for relief pre-positioning in disaster management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 485-509.
    9. Yagci Sokat, Kezban & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen & Bank, Ryan, 2018. "Incomplete information imputation in limited data environments with application to disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 466-485.
    10. Hu, Shao-Long & Han, Chuan-Feng & Meng, Ling-Peng, 2016. "Stochastic optimization for investment in facilities in emergency prevention," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 14-31.
    11. Jeong, Ho Young & Yu, David J. & Min, Byung-Cheol & Lee, Seokcheon, 2020. "The humanitarian flying warehouse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Wang, Qingyi & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for emergency supply planning considering transportation network mitigation and traffic congestion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Ming Zhang & Yu Zhang & Zhifeng Qiu & Hanlin Wu, 2019. "Two-Stage Covering Location Model for Air–Ground Medical Rescue System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Roberto Aringhieri & Sara Bigharaz & Davide Duma & Alberto Guastalla, 2022. "Fairness in ambulance routing for post disaster management," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 189-211, March.
    16. Vahdani, Behnam & Veysmoradi, D. & Mousavi, S.M. & Amiri, M., 2022. "Planning for relief distribution, victim evacuation, redistricting and service sharing under uncertainty," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Maria Rossana D. de Veluz & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi & Renato R. Maaliw & Satria Fadil Persada & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Michael Nayat Young, 2023. "Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Location-Routing Model for Pre-Disaster Planning: A Philippine Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    18. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Kian, Ramez & Erdoğan, Güneş & de Leeuw, Sander & Sibel Salman, F. & Sabet, Ehsan & Kara, Bahar Y. & Demir, Muhittin H., 2022. "Logistics planning of cash transfer to Syrian refugees in Turkey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 1007-1024.
    20. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Hengliang & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "The efficiency, equity and effectiveness of location strategies in humanitarian logistics: A robust chance-constrained approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:1978-:d:1422948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.