IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v136y2020ics1366554519304326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The humanitarian flying warehouse

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong, Ho Young
  • Yu, David J.
  • Min, Byung-Cheol
  • Lee, Seokcheon

Abstract

Delivering commodities by ground vehicles to people in conflict zones risks the safety of humanitarian aid workers. Hundreds of aid workers are killed, injured, or kidnapped when delivering supplies on the road each year. We propose the humanitarian flying warehouse (HFW) as a solution to these issues. The HFW is an airship that stays at high altitudes and uses unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to deliver supplies. This innovation will enable safe and timely delivery to hard-to-reach populations in a manner that significantly exceeds the capacity of current practices. Crucially, the HFW eliminates the motivations behind many delivery disruptions. These disruptions are caused by asymmetric commons dilemmas: entities with different accessibility and power race to grab shared relief goods before others. The problem we address is the operation of HFW to make safe and timely delivery of critical items such as health supplies to the hard to reach populations. This study constitutes proof of concept for the HFW system in conflict zones through a multi-objective mathematical model. The validity of the system is verified via comparative analysis with a ground-based system in a realistic case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong, Ho Young & Yu, David J. & Min, Byung-Cheol & Lee, Seokcheon, 2020. "The humanitarian flying warehouse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s1366554519304326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554519304326
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Kai & Jiang, Yiping & Yuan, Yufei & Zhao, Lindu, 2015. "Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Linet Özdamar & Ediz Ekinci & Beste Küçükyazici, 2004. "Emergency Logistics Planning in Natural Disasters," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 217-245, July.
    3. Begoña Vitoriano & M. Ortuño & Gregorio Tirado & Javier Montero, 2011. "A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 189-208, October.
    4. Max Blouin & Stéphane Pallage, 2008. "Humanitarian Relief and Civil Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(4), pages 548-565, August.
    5. Huang, Michael & Smilowitz, Karen & Balcik, Burcu, 2012. "Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and efficacy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 2-18.
    6. Felder, Stefan & Brinkmann, Henrik, 2002. "Spatial allocation of emergency medical services: minimising the death rate or providing equal access?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 27-45, January.
    7. Arman Nedjati & Bela Vizvari & Gokhan Izbirak, 2016. "Post-earthquake response by small UAV helicopters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1669-1688, February.
    8. Niels Agatz & Paul Bouman & Marie Schmidt, 2018. "Optimization Approaches for the Traveling Salesman Problem with Drone," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 965-981, August.
    9. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2007. "An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 687-709, November.
    10. Ahmadi, Morteza & Seifi, Abbas & Tootooni, Behnam, 2015. "A humanitarian logistics model for disaster relief operation considering network failure and standard relief time: A case study on San Francisco district," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-163.
    11. Holguín-Veras, José & Jaller, Miguel & Wachtendorf, Tricia, 2012. "Comparative performance of alternative humanitarian logistic structures after the Port-au-Prince earthquake: ACEs, PIEs, and CANs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1623-1640.
    12. Zhou, Yawen & Liu, Jing & Zhang, Yutong & Gan, Xiaohui, 2017. "A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-period dynamic emergency resource scheduling problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 77-95.
    13. Rennemo, Sigrid Johansen & Rø, Kristina Fougner & Hvattum, Lars Magnus & Tirado, Gregorio, 2014. "A three-stage stochastic facility routing model for disaster response planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 116-135.
    14. Najafi, Mehdi & Eshghi, Kourosh & Dullaert, Wout, 2013. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 217-249.
    15. E J Lodree Jr & S Taskin, 2008. "An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(5), pages 674-684, May.
    16. Findley, Michael G. & Powell, Josh & Strandow, Daniel & Tanner, Jeff, 2011. "The Localized Geography of Foreign Aid: A New Dataset and Application to Violent Armed Conflict," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1995-2009.
    17. Arman Nedjati & Bela Vizvari & Gokhan Izbirak, 2016. "Post-earthquake response by small UAV helicopters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1669-1688, February.
    18. Wang, Haijun & Du, Lijing & Ma, Shihua, 2014. "Multi-objective open location-routing model with split delivery for optimized relief distribution in post-earthquake," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 160-179.
    19. Li, Lingfeng & Jin, Mingzhou & Zhang, Li, 2011. "Sheltering network planning and management with a case in the Gulf Coast region," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 431-440, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang, 2021. "Role of Industry 4.0 in Supply Chains Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Aditya Kamat & Saket Shanker & Akhilesh Barve & Kamalakanta Muduli & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Uncovering interrelationships between barriers to unmanned aerial vehicles in humanitarian logistics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1134-1160, December.
    4. Marlena Robakowska & Daniel Ślęzak & Przemysław Żuratyński & Anna Tyrańska-Fobke & Piotr Robakowski & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Katarzyna Zorena, 2022. "Possibilities of Using UAVs in Pre-Hospital Security for Medical Emergencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Amine Masmoudi, M. & Mancini, Simona & Baldacci, Roberto & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2022. "Vehicle routing problems with drones equipped with multi-package payload compartments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Dukkanci, Okan & Koberstein, Achim & Kara, Bahar Y., 2023. "Drones for relief logistics under uncertainty after an earthquake," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 117-132.
    7. Wu, Xuanyu & Yang, Min & Liang, Liang, 2024. "Government should be merciful or strict: Penalizing defaulting suppliers in emergency supply chains," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2020. "Innovative “Bring-Service-Near-Your-Home” operations under Corona-Virus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) outbreak: Can logistics become the Messiah?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    3. Changshi Liu & Gang Kou & Yi Peng & Fawaz E. Alsaadi, 2019. "Location-Routing Problem for Relief Distribution in the Early Post-Earthquake Stage from the Perspective of Fairness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    5. Renata Turkeš & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo & Kenneth Sörensen, 2019. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: does putting a price on human life help to save lives?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 865-895, December.
    6. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    7. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1573-1606, December.
    9. Huang, Kai & Jiang, Yiping & Yuan, Yufei & Zhao, Lindu, 2015. "Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-17.
    10. José M. Ferrer & M. Teresa Ortuño & Gregorio Tirado, 2020. "A New Ant Colony-Based Methodology for Disaster Relief," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Nolz, Pamela C., 2016. "Multicriteria optimization in humanitarian aid," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 351-366.
    12. Xuehong Gao, 2022. "A bi-level stochastic optimization model for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in disaster response," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 115-148, December.
    13. Yiping Jiang & Yufei Yuan, 2019. "Emergency Logistics in a Large-Scale Disaster Context: Achievements and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Rodolfo Modrigais Strauss Nunes & Susana Carla Farias Pereira, 2022. "Intellectual structure and trends in the humanitarian operations field," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1099-1157, December.
    15. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    16. Ferrer, José M. & Martín-Campo, F. Javier & Ortuño, M. Teresa & Pedraza-Martínez, Alfonso J. & Tirado, Gregorio & Vitoriano, Begoña, 2018. "Multi-criteria optimization for last mile distribution of disaster relief aid: Test cases and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 501-515.
    17. Zhang, Lingye & Lu, Jing & Yang, Zaili, 2021. "Optimal scheduling of emergency resources for major maritime oil spills considering time-varying demand and transportation networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 529-546.
    18. Paul, Jomon A. & Zhang, Minjiao, 2019. "Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 108-125.
    19. Peiyu Zhang & Yankui Liu & Guoqing Yang & Guoqing Zhang, 2022. "A multi-objective distributionally robust model for sustainable last mile relief network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 689-730, February.
    20. Masoud Mahootchi & Sajjad Golmohammadi, 2018. "Developing a new stochastic model considering bi-directional relations in a natural disaster: a possible earthquake in Tehran (the Capital of Islamic Republic of Iran)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 439-473, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s1366554519304326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.