IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i4p1034-d1072672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Chaotic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Weighted Neutrosophic Fuzzy Soft Rough Sets

Author

Listed:
  • Fu Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Business School, Shanghaidianji University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Weimin Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

In this article, we have proposed a multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) with a new scenario or new condition named Chaotic MAGDM, in which not only the weights of the decision makers (DMs) and the weights of the decision attributes are considered, but also the familiarity of the DMs with the attributes are considered. Then we applied the weighted neutrosophic fuzzy soft rough set theory to Chaotic MAGDM and proposed a new algorithm for MAGDM. Moreover, we provide a case study to demonstrate the application of the algorithm. Our contributions to the literature are as follows: (1) familiarity is rubbed into MAGDM for the first time in the context of neutrosophic fuzzy soft rough sets; (2) a new MAGDM model based on neutrosophic fuzzy soft rough sets has been designed; (3) a sorting/ranking algorithm based on a neutrosophic fuzzy soft rough set is constructed.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu Zhang & Weimin Ma, 2023. "Study on Chaotic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Weighted Neutrosophic Fuzzy Soft Rough Sets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:1034-:d:1072672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/1034/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/1034/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ni Li & Minghui Sun & Zhuming Bi & Zeya Su & Chao Wang, 2014. "A new methodology to support group decision-making for IoT-based emergency response systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 953-977, November.
    2. Wenyu Yu & Zhen Zhang & Qiuyan Zhong, 2021. "Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: a minimum adjustment-based approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 443-466, May.
    3. Yinfeng Du & Dun Liu, 2021. "A novel approach to relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD based on probabilistic linguistic preferences," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 365-395, September.
    4. Huanhuan Jin & Shahzaib Ashraf & Saleem Abdullah & Muhammad Qiyas & Mahwish Bano & Shouzhen Zeng, 2019. "Linguistic Spherical Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications in Multi-Attribute Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Peide Liu & Junlin Liu & Shyi-Ming Chen, 2018. "Some intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Muhammad Qiyas & Saleem Abdullah & Shahzaib Ashraf & Lazim Abdullah, 2019. "Linguistic Picture Fuzzy Dombi Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Mingwei Lin & Zeshui Xu & Yuling Zhai & Zhiqiang Yao, 2018. "Multi-attribute group decision-making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(2), pages 157-170, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kou, Gang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2022. "Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    2. Çağlar Karamaşa & Selçuk Korucuk & Ezgi Demir & Salih Memiş, 2023. "A Quantitative Analysis for Prioritizing Success Elements in Agile Logistics Applications: The Case of Giresun and Ordu," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 11(1), pages 63-84, July.
    3. Afshin Kamyabniya & M. M. Lotfi & Mohsen Naderpour & Yuehwern Yih, 2018. "Robust Platelet Logistics Planning in Disaster Relief Operations Under Uncertainty: a Coordinated Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 759-782, August.
    4. Liangping Wu & Guiwu Wei & Jiang Wu & Cun Wei, 2020. "Some Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Heronian Mean Operators and their Application for Evaluating the Ecological Value of Forest Ecological Tourism Demonstration Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-31, January.
    5. Min Xue & Chao Fu & Shan-Lin Yang, 2021. "Dynamic Expert Reliability Based Feedback Mechanism in Consensus Reaching Process with Distributed Preference Relations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 341-375, April.
    6. Jiahuan He & Xindi Wang & Runtong Zhang & Li Li, 2019. "Some q -Rung Picture Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators with Their Application to Project Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Zhen Zhang & Zhuolin Li, 2023. "Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 911-938, June.
    8. Wenying Wu & Zhiwei Ni & Feifei Jin & Jian Wu & Ying Li & Ping Li, 2021. "Investment Selection Based on Bonferroni Mean under Generalized Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Na Yue & Dongrui Wu & Jialiang Xie & Shuili Chen, 2020. "Probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria decision-making based on double information under imperfect conditions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 391-433, December.
    10. Tao Li & Jiayi Sun & Liguo Fei, 2025. "Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Technology in Emergency Decision-Making: Uncertainty, Heterogeneity, Dynamicity, and Interaction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-45, February.
    11. Yinfeng Du & Zhen-Song Chen & Jie Yang & Juan Antonio Morente-Molinera & Lu Zhang & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2023. "A Textual Data-Oriented Method for Doctor Selection in Online Health Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Krishankumar, Raghunathan & Pamucar, Dragan & Deveci, Muhammat & Aggarwal, Manish & Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian, 2022. "Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1428-1442.
    13. Xiangqian Feng & Xiaodong Pang & Lan Zhang, 2020. "On consistency and priority weights for interval probabilistic linguistic preference relations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 529-560, December.
    14. Gulfam Shahzadi & Muhammad Akram & Ahmad N. Al-Kenani, 2020. "Decision-Making Approach under Pythagorean Fuzzy Yager Weighted Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Babek Erdebilli & Ebru Gecer & İbrahim Yılmaz & Tamer Aksoy & Umit Hacıoglu & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2023. "Q-ROF Fuzzy TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods for the Selection of Sustainable Private Health Insurance Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Junliang Du & Sifeng Liu & Yong Liu & Liangyan Tao, 2023. "Multi-criteria Large-Scale Group Decision-Making in Linguistic Contexts: A Perspective of Conflict Analysis and Resolution," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 177-207, February.
    17. Chady Jabbour & Anis Hoayek & Jean-Michel Salles, 2022. "Formalizing a Two-Step Decision-Making Process in Land Use: Evidence from Controlling Forest Clearcutting Using Spatial Information," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Chen, Xiaohong & Yang, Shuhan & Hu, Dongbin & Li, Xihua, 2024. "Sustainable mining method selection by a multi-stakeholder collaborative multi-attribute group decision-making method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Xiao-Kang Wang & Yi-Ting Wang & Jian-Qiang Wang & Peng-Fei Cheng & Lin Li, 2020. "A TODIM-PROMETHEE ? Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Method for Risk Evaluation of Water Resource Carrying Capacity under Probabilistic Linguistic Z-Number Circumstances," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Kay Lefevre & Chetan Arora & Kevin Lee & Arkady Zaslavsky & Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek & Ali Hassani & Imran Razzak, 2022. "ModelOps for enhanced decision-making and governance in emergency control rooms," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 402-416, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:1034-:d:1072672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.