IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v92y2024ics0301420724004100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable mining method selection by a multi-stakeholder collaborative multi-attribute group decision-making method

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Xiaohong
  • Yang, Shuhan
  • Hu, Dongbin
  • Li, Xihua

Abstract

How to protect the ecological environment during mineral resource exploitation is a crucial issue for the survival and development of human society. In this context, mining method selection requires simultaneous achieving environmental protection and resource exploitation, while involving the coordination of multi-agent interests. Therefore, this study develops a multi-stakeholder collaborative multi-attribute group decision-making approach for mining method selection. This method enables multiple stakeholders and experts from different fields to make decisions together. First, a conflict resolution model is proposed to resolve cognitive conflict and interest conflict among multi-stakeholders. Then, the 2-tuple linguistic representation model is used to deal with the decision maker's fuzzy preference. Next, the comprehensive attribute weights are calculated and the alternatives are prioritized. A case study for mining method selection in a gold mine in Shandong Province, China, is presented to verify the validity of the proposed method. This method considers not only the coordination between mineral resource exploitation and ecological environment protection but also the conflicting views of stakeholders. The proposed method is a useful tool for the assessment and selection of development schemes involving multiple stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Xiaohong & Yang, Shuhan & Hu, Dongbin & Li, Xihua, 2024. "Sustainable mining method selection by a multi-stakeholder collaborative multi-attribute group decision-making method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724004100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724004100
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zorlu, Kuttusi & Polat, Selahattin & Yılmaz, Ali & Dede, Volkan, 2024. "An integrated fuzzy-rough multi-criteria group decision-making model for quantitative assessment of geoheritage resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Zhang, Zhi-Gang & Hu, Xiao & Liu, Zhao-Ting & Zhao, Lu-Tao, 2021. "Multi-attribute decision making: An innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    3. Mancini, Lucia & Sala, Serenella, 2018. "Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 98-111.
    4. Bui, Nuong Thi & Kawamura, Akira & Kim, Kyoung Woong & Prathumratana, Lunchakorn & Kim, Tae-Heok & Yoon, Suk-Ho & Jang, Min & Amaguchi, Hideo & Bui, Duong Du & Truong, Ngoc Tu, 2017. "Proposal of an indicator-based sustainability assessment framework for the mining sector of APEC economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 405-417.
    5. F Samimi Namin & K Shahriar & A Bascetin & S H Ghodsypour, 2012. "FMMSIC: a hybrid fuzzy based decision support system for MMS (in order to estimate interrelationships between criteria)," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(2), pages 218-231, February.
    6. Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini & Siamak Haji Yakchali & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2012. "Using A Integrated MCDM Model for Mining Method Selection in Presence of Uncertainty," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 869-904, January.
    7. Peter C. Fishburn, 1967. "Letter to the Editor—Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 537-542, June.
    8. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Multi-attribute large-scale group decision making with data mining and subgroup leaders: An application to the development of the circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Wenyu Yu & Zhen Zhang & Qiuyan Zhong, 2021. "Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: a minimum adjustment-based approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 443-466, May.
    10. Namin, Farhad Samimi & Ghadi, Aliakbar & Saki, Farshad, 2022. "A literature review of Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) towards mining method selection (MMS)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Xu, Jiuping & Streimikiene, Dalia & Zheng, Xiaosong, 2020. "Adaptive consensus reaching process with hybrid strategies for large-scale group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 957-971.
    12. Batubara, Marwan & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu & Fauzi, Akhmad, 2016. "Proposing a decision-making process for the development of sustainable oil and gas resources using the petroleum fund: A case study of the East Natuna gas field," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 372-384.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jahanbani, Zeinab & Ataee-pour, Majid & Mortazavi, Ali, 2024. "Application of Z-numbers theory to study the influencing criteria in underground mining method selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Ferrer, Luciana Maria & Rodriguez, Daniel Andrés & Forti, Maria Cristina & Carriello, Felix, 2021. "The anthropocene landscape and ecosystem services in the closure of sand mining: Paraíba do Sul River basin – Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Alves, Wellington & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena, 2021. "Challenges and pathways for Brazilian mining sustainability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Syed Imran Zaman & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Sahar Qabool & Himanshu Gupta, 2023. "How digitalization in banking improve service supply chain resilience of e-commerce sector? a technological adoption model approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 904-930, June.
    6. Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet E., 2014. "Dual criteria decisions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 101-113.
      • Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet, 2009. "Dual Criteria Decisions," Working Papers 02-2009, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    7. Van Assche, Kristof & Gruezmacher, Monica & Granzow, Michael, 2021. "From trauma to fantasy and policy. The past in the futures of mining communities; the case of Crowsnest Pass, Alberta," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Słowiński, Roman, 2021. "Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Guzmán, Juan Ignacio & Karpunina, Alina & Araya, Constanza & Faúndez, Patricio & Bocchetto, Marcela & Camacho, Rodolfo & Desormeaux, Daniela & Galaz, Juanita & Garcés, Ingrid & Kracht, Willy & Lagos, , 2023. "Chile: On the road to global sustainable mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Wang, Yujie & Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin & Liu, Bei & Jiang, Shiyan & Yang, Xingxing & Yang, Menghua, 2021. "Evaluating green development level of mineral resource-listed companies: Based on a “dark green” assessment framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    12. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Valmohammadi, Changiz & Khaki, Masoud Mirahmadi, 2019. "Determinants for selection of projects for exploitation of mines in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Fernandez, Viviana, 2021. "Are extractive ventures more socio-environmentally committed?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. V. L. Morgan & E. S. McLamore & M. Correll & G. A. Kiker, 2021. "Emerging mercury mitigation solutions for artisanal small-scale gold mining communities evaluated through a multicriteria decision analysis approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 413-424, September.
    16. Wang, Xu & Fang, Hong & Fang, Siran, 2020. "An integrated approach for exploitation block selection of shale gas—based on cloud model and grey relational analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Christian Artigues & Nicolas Jozefowiez & Boadu M. Sarpong, 2018. "Column generation algorithms for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems with a min–max objective," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 117-142, June.
    18. Heydari, Mehrnoosh & Osanloo, Morteza & Başçetin, Ataç, 2023. "Developing a new social impact assessment model for deep open-pit mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Angelo Antoci & Paolo Russu & Elisa Ticci, 2019. "Mining and Local Economies: Dilemma between Environmental Protection and Job Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Lingyu Li, 2018. "Evaluation and Prediction of City Sustainability Using MCDM and Stochastic Simulation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724004100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.