IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v189y2022icp1428-1442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach

Author

Listed:
  • Krishankumar, Raghunathan
  • Pamucar, Dragan
  • Deveci, Muhammat
  • Aggarwal, Manish
  • Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian

Abstract

With a sheer commitment to reduce carbon footprint, India refined its strategy towards meeting energy demands by adopting renewable energy policies in smart cities. In an event hosted by the Confederation of Indian Industry, the Chairman of the electricity board claimed that India has reached its renewable energy share of 26% and has rigorous plans to reduce carbon trace to adhere to the commitment made in the Paris Accord. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) is an ambitious plan by India to create and manage smart cities with sustainable development plans. Under this plan, renewable energy usage plays a substantial role and the selection of appropriate energy options is a complex decision problem with competing criteria. Previous studies on renewable energy selection have paid subtle attention towards criteria interrelationships, managing of linguistic expressions, and relative importance of experts. Therefore, in this study, a new decision making approach is developed. Specifically, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic information (HFLI) is adopted. Then, attitudinal Choquet integral (AC) is proposed under HFLI context along with their fundamental properties. Besides, relative importance of criteria and experts are determined by evidence-based Bayesian approach and variance approach under HFLI context, respectively. A ranking algorithm is presented with the CRITIC technique. Finally, a case study in Tamil Nadu illustrates the usefulness of the integrated framework and the comparison provides grounding for the superiority of the framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishankumar, Raghunathan & Pamucar, Dragan & Deveci, Muhammat & Aggarwal, Manish & Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian, 2022. "Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1428-1442.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:189:y:2022:i:c:p:1428-1442
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122003652
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Thanh Nguyen & Nguyen Hoang Hai & Nguyen Thi Kim Lan, 2022. "Spherical Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Wind Turbine Supplier Selection in a Renewable Energy Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Strantzali, Eleni & Aravossis, Konstantinos, 2016. "Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 885-898.
    3. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    4. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    5. Wenyu Yu & Zhen Zhang & Qiuyan Zhong, 2021. "Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: a minimum adjustment-based approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 443-466, May.
    6. Sitorus, Fernando & Brito-Parada, Pablo R., 2020. "A multiple criteria decision making method to weight the sustainability criteria of renewable energy technologies under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Saeed Khojaste Effatpanah & Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi & Pasura Aungkulanon & Akbar Maleki & Milad Sadeghzadeh & Mohsen Sharifpur & Lingen Chen, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Five Widely-Used Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Clean Energy Technologies: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-33, January.
    8. Alok K. Pandey & R. Krishankumar & Dragan Pamucar & Fausto Cavallaro & Abbas Mardani & Samarjit Kar & K. S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Bibliometric Review on Decision Approaches for Clean Energy Systems under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Venkatraman Indrajayanthan & Nalin Kant Mohanty, 2022. "Assessment of Clean Energy Transition Potential in Major Power-Producing States of India Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 58-74.
    11. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Karabulut, Yağmur & Mukul, Esin, 2018. "A novel renewable energy selection model for United Nations' sustainable development goals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 290-302.
    12. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    13. Abdel-Basset, Mohamed & Gamal, Abduallah & Chakrabortty, Ripon K. & Ryan, Michael J., 2021. "Evaluation approach for sustainable renewable energy systems under uncertain environment: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1073-1095.
    14. Ayşegül Tuş & Esra Aytaç Adalı, 2019. "The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 528-538, June.
    15. Lee, Hsing-Chen & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2018. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 883-896.
    16. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Çolak, Murat & Kaya, İhsan, 2017. "Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 840-853.
    18. Noorollahi, Younes & Ghenaatpisheh Senani, Ali & Fadaei, Ahmad & Simaee, Mobina & Moltames, Rahim, 2022. "A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 89-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castro, J.S. & Ferreira, J. & Magalhães, I.B. & Jesus Junior, M.M. & Marangon, B.B. & Pereira, A.S.A.P. & Lorentz, J.F. & Gama, R.C.N. & Rodrigues, F.A. & Calijuri, M.L., 2023. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis for biofuel and biofertilizer recovery as by-products from microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Gupta, Soniya & Joshi, Dheeraj Kumar & Awasthi, Natasha & Pant, Manish & Joshi, Bhagawati prasad & Chaube, Shshank, 2024. "Distance and similarity measures of Hesitant bi-fuzzy set and its applications in renewable energy systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 321-336.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Horasan, Muhammed Bilal & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk, 2022. "A multi-objective decision-making model for renewable energy planning: The case of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 484-504.
    2. Paula Donaduzzi Rigo & Graciele Rediske & Carmen Brum Rosa & Natália Gava Gastaldo & Leandro Michels & Alvaro Luiz Neuenfeldt Júnior & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk, 2020. "Renewable Energy Problems: Exploring the Methods to Support the Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    3. José Carlos Romero & Pedro Linares, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision-Making as an Operational Conceptualization of Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Empirical investigation and validation of sustainability indicators for the assessment of energy sources in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Giri, Puspendu & Paul, Somnath & Debnath, Bijoy Krishna, 2024. "A fuzzy Graph Theory and Matrix Approach (fuzzy GTMA) to select the best renewable energy alternative in India," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    6. Rahadian Dadan & Firli Anisah & Dinçer Hasan & Yüksel Serhat & Hacıoğlu Ümit & Gherghina Ştefan Cristian & Aksoy Tamer, 2023. "An Evaluation of E7 Countries’ Sustainable Energy Investments: A Decision-Making Approach with Spherical Fuzzy Sets," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Ali Mostafaeipour & Ali Sadeghi Sedeh & Shahariar Chowdhury & Kuaanan Techato, 2020. "Ranking Potential Renewable Energy Systems to Power On-Farm Fertilizer Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Bilgili, Faik & Zarali, Fulya & Ilgün, Miraç Fatih & Dumrul, Cüneyt & Dumrul, Yasemin, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for sustainable development in Turkey using ‌intuitionistic‌ ‌fuzzy‌-TOPSIS method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1443-1458.
    9. Siksnelyte, Indre & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Bausys, Romualdas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2019. "Implementation of EU energy policy priorities in the Baltic Sea Region countries: Sustainability assessment based on neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 90-102.
    10. Hashemizadeh, Ali & Ju, Yanbing & Bamakan, Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini & Le, Hoang Phong, 2021. "Renewable energy investment risk assessment in belt and road initiative countries under uncertainty conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    11. Nebiyu Kedir & Phuong H. D. Nguyen & Citlaly Pérez & Pedro Ponce & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Fuzzy Hybrid Methods in Photovoltaic Solar Energy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Guidance for Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-38, April.
    12. Rivero-Iglesias, Jose M. & Puente, Javier & Fernandez, Isabel & León, Omar, 2023. "Integrated model for the assessment of power generation alternatives through analytic hierarchy process and a fuzzy inference system. Case study of Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 563-581.
    13. Gezen, Mesliha & Karaaslan, Abdulkerim, 2022. "Energy planning based on Vision-2023 of Turkey with a goal programming under fuzzy multi-objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    14. Osman Taylan & Rami Alamoudi & Mohammad Kabli & Alawi AlJifri & Fares Ramzi & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Assessment of Energy Systems Using Extended Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS Approaches to Manage Non-Cooperative Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Abteen Ijadi Maghsoodi & Arta Ijadi Maghsoodi & Amir Mosavi & Timon Rabczuk & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2018. "Renewable Energy Technology Selection Problem Using Integrated H-SWARA-MULTIMOORA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Alok K. Pandey & R. Krishankumar & Dragan Pamucar & Fausto Cavallaro & Abbas Mardani & Samarjit Kar & K. S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Bibliometric Review on Decision Approaches for Clean Energy Systems under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Fausto Cavallaro & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antuchevičienė & Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran, 2022. "A New Approach to the Viable Ranking of Zero-Carbon Construction Materials with Generalized Fuzzy Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Mohsen Ramezanzade & Hossein Karimi & Khalid Almutairi & Hoa Ao Xuan & Javad Saebi & Ali Mostafaeipour & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Implementing MCDM Techniques for Ranking Renewable Energy Projects under Fuzzy Environment: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-38, November.
    19. Pratibha Rani & Jabir Ali & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "An Integrated Single-Valued Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution Methodology for Renewable Energy Resource Selection Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Peng, Honggang & Xiao, Zhi & Wang, Jianqiang & Li, Jian, 2021. "A decision support framework for new energy selection in rural areas from the perspectives of information reliability and criterion non-compensation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:189:y:2022:i:c:p:1428-1442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.