IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i4p1011-d1070441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Qualified Public Safety Education Venues Using the Dempster–Shafer Theory-Based PROMETHEE Method under Linguistic Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Yiqian Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yutong Dai

    (School of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Bo Liu

    (Department of Sociology, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

How to improve safety awareness is an important topic, and it is of great significance for the public to reduce losses in the face of disasters and crises. A public safety education venue is an important carrier to realize safety education, as it has the characteristics of professionalism, comprehensiveness, experience, interest, participation, and so on, arousing the enthusiasm of the public for learning. As a meaningful supplement to “formal safety education”, venue education has many advantages. However, there are problems in the current venue construction such as imperfect infrastructure, weak professionalism, poor service level, chaotic organizational structure, and low safety, which affect the effect of safety education. To evaluate safety education venues effectively, this study proposes an evidential PROMETHEE method under linguistic environments. The innovation of this study lies in the integration of various linguistic expressions into the Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) framework, realizing the free expression and choice of evaluation information. The results and contributions of this study are summarized as follows. First, a two-tier evaluation index system of public safety education venues including 18 sub-standards is constructed. Secondly, it sets up four levels of quality evaluation for public safety education venues. Third, the belief function is used to represent all kinds of linguistic information, so as to maximize the effect of linguistic information fusion. Fourthly, an evidential PROMETHEE model is proposed to rank the venues. Fifthly, a case study is presented to demonstrate the usage of the proposed method in detail, and the evaluation results are fully analyzed and discussed. The implications of this study are as follows. First of all, to enhance public safety education, people need to face the significance of experiential education venues. Second, experiential education venues can increase learners’ enthusiasm for learning. Thirdly, the evaluation index system provided in this paper can be used to guide the construction of appropriate education venues in cities. Fourthly, the method of linguistic information transformation based on DST is also applicable to other decision-making and evaluation problems. Finally, the evidential PROMETHEE method can not only evaluate the quality of education venues, but also be used to rank a group of alternative venues.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiqian Zhang & Yutong Dai & Bo Liu, 2023. "Identifying Qualified Public Safety Education Venues Using the Dempster–Shafer Theory-Based PROMETHEE Method under Linguistic Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:1011-:d:1070441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/1011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/4/1011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amin Hosseinpoor Milaghardan & Rahim Ali Abbaspour & Mina Khalesian, 2020. "Evaluation of the effects of uncertainty on the predictions of landslide occurrences using the Shannon entropy theory and Dempster–Shafer theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(1), pages 49-67, January.
    2. Danlin Yu & Chuanglin Fang & Dan Xue & Jingyuan Yin, 2014. "Assessing Urban Public Safety via Indicator-Based Evaluating Method: A Systemic View of Shanghai," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 89-104, May.
    3. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Torabi, S. Ali & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2019. "Prioritizing disaster-prone areas for large-scale earthquakes' preparedness: Methodology and application," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 9-25.
    4. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Taheri-Moghaddam, Alireza, 2016. "An approximation approach to a trade-off among efficiency, efficacy, and balance for relief pre-positioning in disaster management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 485-509.
    5. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2021. "Resilience assessment of regional areas against earthquakes using multi-source information fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Li, Cong-Cong & Dong, Yucheng & Liang, Haiming & Pedrycz, Witold & Herrera, Francisco, 2022. "Data-driven method to learning personalized individual semantics to support linguistic multi-attribute decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Mahsa Ghandi & Abbas Roozbahani, 2020. "Risk Management of Drinking Water Supply in Critical Conditions Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE V Technique," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(2), pages 595-615, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Akyuz, Emre & Arslan, Ozcan, 2022. "An extended HEART Dempster–Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    3. Zhang, Lingye & Lu, Jing & Yang, Zaili, 2021. "Optimal scheduling of emergency resources for major maritime oil spills considering time-varying demand and transportation networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 529-546.
    4. Ju He & Yunxiao Dang & Wenzhong Zhang & Li Chen, 2020. "Perception of Urban Public Safety of Floating Population with Higher Education Background: Evidence from Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Nehal Elshaboury & Tarek Attia & Mohamed Marzouk, 2020. "Comparison of Several Aggregation Techniques for Deriving Analytic Network Process Weights," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4901-4919, December.
    6. Govindan, Kannan & Mina, Hassan & Alavi, Behrouz, 2020. "A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: A case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Acar, Müge & Kaya, Onur, 2019. "A healthcare network design model with mobile hospitals for disaster preparedness: A case study for Istanbul earthquake," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 273-292.
    8. Hu, Shaolong & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Dai, Rui, 2024. "A machine learning based sample average approximation for supplier selection with option contract in humanitarian relief," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    10. Khanchehzarrin, Saeed & Ghaebi Panah, Mona & Mahdavi-Amiri, Nezam & Shiripour, Saber, 2022. "A bi-level multi-objective location-routing optimization model for disaster relief operations considering public donations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Bhuvnesh Sharma & M. Ramkumar & Nachiappan Subramanian & Bharat Malhotra, 2019. "Dynamic temporary blood facility location-allocation during and post-disaster periods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 705-736, December.
    12. Silvia Barbetta & Bianca Bonaccorsi & Stavroula Tsitsifli & Ivana Boljat & Papakonstantinou Argiris & Jasmina Lukač Reberski & Christian Massari & Emanuele Romano, 2022. "Assessment of Flooding Impact on Water Supply Systems: A Comprehensive Approach Based on DSS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(14), pages 5443-5459, November.
    13. Ali Torabi, S. & Shokr, Iman & Tofighi, Saeideh & Heydari, Jafar, 2018. "Integrated relief pre-positioning and procurement planning in humanitarian supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 123-146.
    14. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.
    15. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1573-1606, December.
    16. Sabbaghtorkan, Monir & Batta, Rajan & He, Qing, 2020. "Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster operations management: Review and research gap identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 1-19.
    17. Ghavamifar, Ali & Torabi, S. Ali & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2022. "A hybrid relief procurement contract for humanitarian logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng, 2022. "A demand-based framework for resilience assessment of multistate networks under disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Sezer, Sukru Ilke & Camliyurt, Gokhan & Aydin, Muhmmet & Akyuz, Emre & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "A bow-tie extended D-S evidence-HEART modelling for risk analysis of cargo tank cracks on oil/chemical tanker," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Panpan Lian & Zhenyu Zhuo & Yanbin Qi & Dingde Xu & Xin Deng, 2021. "The Impacts of Training on Farmers’ Preparedness Behaviors of Earthquake Disaster—Evidence from Earthquake-Prone Settlements in Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:1011-:d:1070441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.