IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i15p3352-d1207298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Bilateral Relationship between Mexico and South Korea through the Trade in Value-Added Perspective, 2000–2021

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Morales-López

    (Department of Economics, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Acatlán UNAM, Naucalpan de Juárez 53150, Mexico)

  • Luis Quintana-Romero

    (Department of Economics, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Acatlán UNAM, Naucalpan de Juárez 53150, Mexico)

  • Nam Kwon Mun

    (Department of Latin American Studies, Graduate School of International and Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)

  • Inhye Oh

    (Department of Latin American Studies, Graduate School of International and Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This article examines the trade relationship between Mexico and South Korea through the lens of trade in value-added perspective. Using the global input–output model, we dissect gross exports into their value-added components to analyze the sectors benefiting most from value-added generation in both countries. To do this, we use the multiregional input–output matrices developed by the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The results show a growing bilateral relationship between 2000 and 2021, with South Korea having a stronger position by generating a larger share of value-added linked to the bilateral relationship. Nevertheless, the gap has narrowed over time. Notably, South Korean exports to Mexico have substantially contributed to value-added generation in technology-based manufacturing sectors such as machinery, equipment, electronics, electrical, and optical products. Similarly, Mexico’s mining sector increasingly relies on exports to South Korea for value-added generation. The trends observed in this study’s findings persist even amidst the reconfiguration of Global Value Chains, indicating that a free trade agreement between Mexico and South Korea has the potential to further enhance value-added generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Morales-López & Luis Quintana-Romero & Nam Kwon Mun & Inhye Oh, 2023. "Examining the Bilateral Relationship between Mexico and South Korea through the Trade in Value-Added Perspective, 2000–2021," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:15:p:3352-:d:1207298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/15/3352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/15/3352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2014. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 459-494, February.
    2. Alessandro Borin & Michele Mancini, 2023. "Measuring what matters in value-added trade," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 586-613, October.
    3. Xinru Li & Xikang Chen, 2019. "Sino-US trade balance from national income perspective and global income chains," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 389-402, October.
    4. Kozo Kiyota, 2016. "Exports and Employment in China, Indonesia, Japan, and Korea," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 15(1), pages 57-72, Winter/Sp.
    5. Fujii-Gambero, Gerardo & Betancourt-Gómez, Michel, 2022. "Diferencias en la calidad de las exportaciones manufactureras de México y Corea por niveles tecnológicos," El Trimestre Económico, Fondo de Cultura Económica, vol. 89(354), pages 587-611, abril-jun.
    6. Arne J. Nagengast & Robert Stehrer, 2016. "Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(9), pages 1276-1306, September.
    7. Luis Quintana-Romero & Nam Kwon Mun & Roldán Andrés-Rosales & José Álvarez-García, 2020. "Trade Complementarity and the Balance of Payments Constraint Hypothesis: A New Free Trade Agreement between Mexico and South Korea," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Hummels, David & Ishii, Jun & Yi, Kei-Mu, 2001. "The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 75-96, June.
    9. Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei & Kunfu Zhu, 2013. "Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels," NBER Working Papers 19677, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Robert Koopman & William Powers & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2010. "Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains," NBER Working Papers 16426, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Johnson, Robert C. & Noguera, Guillermo, 2012. "Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 224-236.
    12. Bart Los & Marcel P. Timmer & Gaaitzen J. de Vries, 2016. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(7), pages 1958-1966, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia Fabiani & Alberto Felettigh & Alfonso Rosolia, 2023. "Foreign Value Added along the Consumption Distribution," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(1), pages 35-60, March.
    2. Ilaria Fusacchia, 2020. "Evaluating the Impact of the US–China Trade War on Euro Area Economies: A Tale of Global Value Chains," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 6(3), pages 441-468, November.
    3. Baldwin, Richard & Freeman, Rebecca & Theodorakopoulos, Angelos, 2022. "Horses for courses: measuring foreign supply chain exposure," Bank of England working papers 996, Bank of England.
    4. Jangam, Bhushan Praveen & Rath, Badri Narayan, 2020. "Cross-country convergence in global value chains: Evidence from club convergence analysis," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 134-146.
    5. Inaki Arto & Erik Dietzenbacher & Jose Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2019. "Measuring bilateral trade in terms of value added," JRC Research Reports JRC116694, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Hongsheng Zhang & Bo Meng & Shuzhong Ma, 2018. "Determinants of China's bilateral trade balance in global value chains," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 463-485, July.
    7. Pol Antràs & Davin Chor, 2021. "Global Value Chains," NBER Working Papers 28549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Borin, Alessandro & Mancini, Michele, 2017. "Follow the Value Added: Tracking Bilateral Relations in Global Value Chains," MPRA Paper 82692, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Giunta, A. & Montalbano, P. & Nenci, S., 2022. "Consistency of micro- and macro-level data on global value chains: Evidence from selected European countries," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 130-142.
    10. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2019. "Global Value Chains and Wages: Multi-Country Evidence from Linked Worker-Industry Data," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 505-539, July.
    11. Arne J. Nagengast & Robert Stehrer, 2016. "Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(9), pages 1276-1306, September.
    12. Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci & Carlo Pietrobelli, 2018. "Opening and linking up: firms, GVCs, and productivity in Latin America," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 917-935, April.
    13. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2022. "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    14. Xu, Xueliu & Wang, Qian & Ran, Chenyang & Mu, Mingjie, 2021. "Is burden responsibility more effective? A value-added method for tracing worldwide carbon emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Boya Zhang & Shukuan Bai & Yadong Ning & Tao Ding & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Emission Embodied in International Trade and Its Responsibility from the Perspective of Global Value Chain: Progress, Trends, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    16. Colozza, Federico & Boschma, Ron & Morrison, Andrea & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2021. "The importance of global value chains and regional capabilities for the economic complexity of EU-regions," MERIT Working Papers 2021-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Bo Meng & Ming Ye & Shang‐Jin Wei, 2020. "Measuring Smile Curves in Global Value Chains," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(5), pages 988-1016, October.
    18. Rita Cappariello & Alberto Felettigh, 2015. "How does foreign demand activate domestic value added? A comparison among the largest euro-area economies," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1001, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. Liou, Ruey-Wan & Lin, Hsing-Chun & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2016. "Unveiling the true value of across-strait trade: The global value chain approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 159-180.
    20. Fan, Xiaojia & Wu, Sanmang & Lei, Yalin & Li, Shantong & Li, Li, 2020. "Have China's resource-based regions improved in the division of GVCs? — Taking Shanxi Province as an example," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:15:p:3352-:d:1207298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.