IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i10p2355-d1150327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Supply Chain Coordination Considering Carbon Emissions and Product Green Level Dependent Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Li

    (Department of Decision Sciences, School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China)

  • Guanlai Zhu

    (Department of Decision Sciences, School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China)

Abstract

As traditional supply chains face increasingly severe environmental issues, and as countries promote green development and sustainable development policy concepts, cultivating green supply chain operation models is gradually coming to be highly valued by governments and enterprises. Generally speaking, the production of green products incurs higher additional costs, and thus, their total production costs also increase. In this work, we studied the coordination mechanism, by considering carbon emissions and product green level dependent demand, in which the product green level is related to the random demand. Under the green supply chain buyback contract with the green product R & D cost sharing between the manufacturer and the retailer, both the product green level and the order quantity need to be decided, to maximize the channel profit. In order to coordinate the green supply chain, the manufacturer needs to share both the risk of good salvage and the green product R & D cost with the retailer. We found that both the wholesale price and the buyback price increase in the manufacturer’s proposition of the green product R & D cost, but decrease in the emission reduction efficiency coefficient or carbon trading price. In addition, the product green level, the optimal order quantity and the channel profit increase in the emission reduction efficiency coefficient, but decrease in the R & D cost coefficient of the product green level. Interestingly, we found that if the carbon trading price is low, the manufacturer will set a low product green level, and the product carbon emission trading is a cost for the supply chain. The increment of the carbon trading price leads to a higher cost, such that the channel profit is decreased. However, if the carbon trading price is high, the manufacturer will set a high product green level, and the product carbon emission trading is a revenue for the supply chain. The increment of the carbon trading price leads to a higher revenue, such that the channel profit is increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Li & Guanlai Zhu, 2023. "Green Supply Chain Coordination Considering Carbon Emissions and Product Green Level Dependent Demand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:10:p:2355-:d:1150327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/10/2355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/10/2355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Shen & Chen Zhu & Qingying Li & Xiaofeng Wang, 2021. "Green technology adoption in textiles and apparel supply chains with environmental taxes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(14), pages 4157-4174, July.
    2. Jerome Vanclay & John Shortiss & Scott Aulsebrook & Angus Gillespie & Ben Howell & Rhoda Johanni & Michael Maher & Kelly Mitchell & Mark Stewart & Jim Yates, 2011. "Customer Response to Carbon Labelling of Groceries," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 153-160, March.
    3. Zhao, Ning & Lian, Zhaotong, 2011. "A queueing-inventory system with two classes of customers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 225-231, January.
    4. Pieter Jan Kole & Ansje J. Löhr & Frank G. A. J. Van Belleghem & Ad M. J. Ragas, 2017. "Wear and Tear of Tyres: A Stealthy Source of Microplastics in the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Terry A. Taylor, 2002. "Supply Chain Coordination Under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 992-1007, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yutong Lang & Xiaoyu Ji & Yingtong Wang & Yingfu He, 2024. "Carbon Asset Management Mode Selection for Capital-Constrained Enterprises," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiang Han & Yuyan Wang, 2018. "Decision and Coordination in a Low-Carbon E-Supply Chain Considering the Manufacturer’s Carbon Emission Reduction Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Lin Sun & Qixiang Yuan, 2024. "Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Yang, Jian & Qi, Xiangtong, 2009. "On the design of coordinating contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 581-594, December.
    4. Tian, Yi & Ma, Junhai & Xie, Lei & Koivumäki, Timo & Seppänen, Veikko, 2020. "Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers’ channel preference and sales effort," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Shraddha Yadav & Yingjiao Xu & Helmut Hergeth, 2024. "Walking the Talk: Unraveling the Influence of the Sustainability Features of Leather Alternatives on Consumer Behavior toward Running Shoes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276930, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    7. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2020. "Supplier–carrier–buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier–buyer partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Song Yang & Jincai Zhuang & Aifeng Wang & Yancai Zhang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Chinese Food Quality considering Effort Levels," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, November.
    10. Cao, Zong-Hong & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Zhao, Ju & Li, Chang-Wen, 2015. "Entry mode selection and its impact on an incumbent supply chain coordination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    12. Fan, Jianchang & Ni, Debing & Fang, Xiang, 2020. "Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 514-537.
    13. Wang, Deshen & Chen, Bintong & Chen, Jing, 2019. "Credit card fraud detection strategies with consumer incentives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 179-195.
    14. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Wang, Sheng-Dong, 2009. "Manufacturer-buyer coordination for newsvendor-type-products with two ordering opportunities and partial backorders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 958-974, November.
    15. Hui Zhang & Tao Huang & Tao Yan, 2022. "A quantitative analysis of risk-sharing agreements with patient support programs for improving medication adherence," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 253-274, June.
    16. Chiara Mazzocchi & Guido Sali, 2022. "Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 701-723, January.
    17. Sule Birim & Cigdem Sofyalioglu, 2017. "Evaluating vendor managed inventory systems: how incentives can benefit supply chain partners," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 163-179, January.
    18. Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2010. "Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1592-1610, December.
    19. Qiuyun Zhu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Aijun Liu & Chong Gao & Lei Xu & Fan Zhao & Ding Zhang & Benjamin Lev, 2022. "Equilibrium Optimization with Multi-Energy-Efficiency-Grade Products: Government and Market Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Cao, Erbao & Du, Lingxia & Ruan, Junhu, 2019. "Financing preferences and performance for an emission-dependent supply chain: Supplier vs. bank," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 383-399.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:10:p:2355-:d:1150327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.