IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i4p549-d746444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Intelligent Expert Combination Weighting Scheme for Group Decision Making in Railway Reconstruction

Author

Listed:
  • Lihua Zeng

    (School of Software, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Haiping Ren

    (School of Software, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Tonghua Yang

    (School of Vocational Education and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)

  • Neal Xiong

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, OK 74133, USA)

Abstract

The intuitionistic fuzzy entropy has been widely used in measuring the uncertainty of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In view of some counterintuitive phenomena of the existing intuitionistic fuzzy entropies, this article proposes an improved intuitionistic fuzzy entropy based on the cotangent function, which not only considers the deviation between membership and non-membership, but also expresses the hesitancy degree of decision makers. The analyses and comparison of the data show that the improved entropy is reasonable. Then, a new IF similarity measure whose value is an IF number is proposed. The intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and similarity measure are applied to the study of the expert weight in group decision making. Based on the research of the existing expert clustering and weighting methods, we summarize an intelligent expert combination weighting scheme. Through the new intuitionistic fuzzy similarity, the decision matrix is transformed into a similarity matrix, and through the analysis of threshold change rate and the design of risk parameters, reasonable expert clustering results are obtained. On this basis, each category is weighted; the experts in the category are weighted by entropy weight theory, and the total weight of experts is determined by synthesizing the two weights. This scheme provides a new method in determining the weight of experts objectively and reasonably. Finally, the method is applied to the evaluation of railway reconstruction scheme, and an example shows the feasibility of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihua Zeng & Haiping Ren & Tonghua Yang & Neal Xiong, 2022. "An Intelligent Expert Combination Weighting Scheme for Group Decision Making in Railway Reconstruction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:549-:d:746444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul T E Cusack, 2020. "The Human Brain," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 31(3), pages 24261-24266, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominic Holland & Oleksandr Frei & Rahul Desikan & Chun-Chieh Fan & Alexey A Shadrin & Olav B Smeland & V S Sundar & Paul Thompson & Ole A Andreassen & Anders M Dale, 2020. "Beyond SNP heritability: Polygenicity and discoverability of phenotypes estimated with a univariate Gaussian mixture model," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Julia Berezutskaya & Zachary V Freudenburg & Umut Güçlü & Marcel A J van Gerven & Nick F Ramsey, 2020. "Brain-optimized extraction of complex sound features that drive continuous auditory perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-34, July.
    3. Abigail B. Schneider & Bridget Leonard, 2022. "From anxiety to control: Mask‐wearing, perceived marketplace influence, and emotional well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 97-119, March.
    4. Geonhui Lee & Woong Choi & Hanjin Jo & Wookhyun Park & Jaehyo Kim, 2020. "Analysis of motor control strategy for frontal and sagittal planes of circular tracking movements using visual feedback noise from velocity change and depth information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Odelaisy León-Triana & Julián Pérez-Beteta & David Albillo & Ana Ortiz de Mendivil & Luis Pérez-Romasanta & Elisabet González-Del Portillo & Manuel Llorente & Natalia Carballo & Estanislao Arana & Víc, 2021. "Brain Metastasis Response to Stereotactic Radio Surgery: A Mathematical Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Mirren Charnley & Saba Islam & Guneet K. Bindra & Jeremy Engwirda & Julian Ratcliffe & Jiangtao Zhou & Raffaele Mezzenga & Mark D. Hulett & Kyunghoon Han & Joshua T. Berryman & Nicholas P. Reynolds, 2022. "Neurotoxic amyloidogenic peptides in the proteome of SARS-COV2: potential implications for neurological symptoms in COVID-19," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Samy Castro & Wael El-Deredy & Demian Battaglia & Patricio Orio, 2020. "Cortical ignition dynamics is tightly linked to the core organisation of the human connectome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Brinkman, Sally & Le, Huong Thu & Zubrick, Stephen R. & Mitrou, Francis, 2022. "Gender differences in time allocation contribute to differences in developmental outcomes in children and adolescents," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ of Quantum Technologies: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, March.
    10. April R. Kriebel & Joshua D. Welch, 2022. "UINMF performs mosaic integration of single-cell multi-omic datasets using nonnegative matrix factorization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Boada, Júlia Pareto & Maestre, Begoña Román & Genís, Carme Torras, 2021. "The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: A critical literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Hamed Nili & Alexander Walther & Arjen Alink & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2020. "Inferring exemplar discriminability in brain representations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Valtteri Arstila & Alexandra L Georgescu & Henri Pesonen & Daniel Lunn & Valdas Noreika & Christine M Falter-Wagner, 2020. "Event timing in human vision: Modulating factors and independent functions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Don, Arjuna P.H. & Peters, James F. & Ramanna, Sheela & Tozzi, Arturo, 2021. "Quaternionic views of rs-fMRI hierarchical brain activation regions. Discovery of multilevel brain activation region intensities in rs-fMRI video frames," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Linzmajer, Marc & Hubert, Mirja & Hubert, Marco, 2021. "It’s about the process, not the result: An fMRI approach to explore the encoding of explicit and implicit price information," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Natalie J Shook & Barış Sevi & Jerin Lee & Benjamin Oosterhoff & Holly N Fitzgerald, 2020. "Disease avoidance in the time of COVID-19: The behavioral immune system is associated with concern and preventative health behaviors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Cristina Lázaro-Pérez & José Ángel Martínez-López & José Gómez-Galán, 2020. "Addictions in Spanish College Students in Confinement Times: Preventive and Social Perspective," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Yashika Arora & Pushpinder Walia & Mitsuhiro Hayashibe & Makii Muthalib & Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury & Stephane Perrey & Anirban Dutta, 2021. "Grey-box modeling and hypothesis testing of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based cerebrovascular reactivity to anodal high-definition tDCS in healthy humans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-38, October.
    19. Elvisa Drishti & Bresena Kopliku & Drini Imami, 2022. "Active political engagement, political patronage and local labour markets – The example of Shkoder," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(6), pages 1118-1142, April.
    20. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Carlos Mora-Frank & Lady Bravo-Montero, 2021. "Scientific Research in Ecuador: A Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-34, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:549-:d:746444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.