IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i17p3115-d901955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Occurrence-Based Double Thresholding Method for Research Topic Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Christian-Daniel Curiac

    (Department of Computer and Information Technology, Politehnica University of Timisoara, V. Parvan 2, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Alex Doboli

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2350, USA)

  • Daniel-Ioan Curiac

    (Department of Automation and Applied Informatics, Politehnica University of Timisoara, V. Parvan 2, 300223 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Identifying possible research gaps is a main step in problem framing, however it is increasingly tedious and expensive considering the continuously growing amount of published material. This situation suggests the critical need for methodologies and tools that can assist researchers in their selection of future research topics. Related work mostly focuses on trend analysis and impact prediction but less on research gap identification. This paper presents our first approach in automated identification of feasible research gaps by using a double-threshold procedure to eliminate the research gaps that are currently difficult to study or offer little novelty. Gaps are then found by extracting subgraphs for the less-frequent co-occurrences and correlations of key terms describing domains. A case study applying the methodology for electronic design automation (EDA) domain is also discussed in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian-Daniel Curiac & Alex Doboli & Daniel-Ioan Curiac, 2022. "Co-Occurrence-Based Double Thresholding Method for Research Topic Identification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-10, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3115-:d:901955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xiang & Jiang, Tingting & Ma, Feicheng, 2013. "Collective dynamics in knowledge networks: Emerging trends analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 425-438.
    2. Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & María Viedma-del-Jesús & Juan Sánchez-Fernández & Antonio López-Herrera, 2012. "An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1077-1095, June.
    3. Akimushkin, Camilo & Amancio, Diego R. & Oliveira, Osvaldo N., 2018. "On the role of words in the network structure of texts: Application to authorship attribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 495(C), pages 49-58.
    4. S. Phineas Upham & Henry Small, 2010. "Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 15-38, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    2. Yi-Ming Wei & Jin-Wei Wang & Tianqi Chen & Bi-Ying Yu & Hua Liao, 2018. "Frontiers of Low-Carbon Technologies: Results from Bibliographic Coupling with Sliding Window," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 116, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    3. Xuefeng Wang & Shuo Zhang & Yuqin liu, 2022. "ITGInsight–discovering and visualizing research fronts in the scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6509-6531, November.
    4. Joel O. Botai & Christina M. Botai & Katlego P. Ncongwane & Sylvester Mpandeli & Luxon Nhamo & Muthoni Masinde & Abiodun M. Adeola & Michael G. Mengistu & Henerica Tazvinga & Miriam D. Murambadoro & S, 2021. "A Review of the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Research in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Alba Santa Soriano & Carolina Lorenzo Álvarez & Rosa María Torres Valdés, 2018. "Bibliometric analysis to identify an emerging research area: Public Relations Intelligence—a challenge to strengthen technological observatories in the network society," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1591-1614, June.
    6. Serhat Burmaoglu & Olivier Sartenaer & Alan Porter & Munan Li, 2019. "Analysing the theoretical roots of technology emergence: an evolutionary perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 97-118, April.
    7. Keith D. Brouthers & Ram Mudambi & David M. Reeb, 2012. "The blockbuster hypothesis: influencing the boundaries of knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 959-982, March.
    8. Li, Menghui & Yang, Liying & Zhang, Huina & Shen, Zhesi & Wu, Chensheng & Wu, Jinshan, 2017. "Do mathematicians, economists and biomedical scientists trace large topics more strongly than physicists?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 598-607.
    9. Lu, Kun & Yang, Guancan & Wang, Xue, 2022. "Topics emerged in the biomedical field and their characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Hossain, Mohammad Rokibul & Akhter, Fahmida & Sultana, Mir Misnad, 2022. "SMEs in Covid-19 Crisis and Combating Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and A Case from Emerging Economy," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    11. Liu, Xiang & Jiang, Tingting & Ma, Feicheng, 2013. "Collective dynamics in knowledge networks: Emerging trends analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 425-438.
    12. Roger Fouquet, 2012. "Economics of Energy and Climate Change: Origins, Developments and Growth," Working Papers 2012-08, BC3.
    13. Nadezhda Mikova & Anna Sokolova, 2014. "Selection of information sources for identifying technology trends: A comparative analysis," HSE Working papers WP BRP 25/STI/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    14. Xiwen Liu & Xuezhao Wang & Lucheng Lyu & Yanpeng Wang, 2022. "Identifying disruptive technologies by integrating multi-source data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5325-5351, September.
    15. Mauricio Marrone, 2020. "Application of entity linking to identify research fronts and trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 357-379, January.
    16. Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh, 2020. "Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 175-194, May.
    17. Jabłońska-Sabuka, Matylda & Sitarz, Robert & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2014. "Forecasting research trends using population dynamics model with Burgers’ type interaction," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 111-122.
    18. Silva Francisco Javier Varona & Aguilera Nolberto Cruz & Hernández Jorge Raúl Ávilas & Pino Maira Rosario Moreno & Gačnik Maja Borlinič, 2024. "Integrated Communications Management in Organisations: Bibliometric Insight into Past and Future," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 226-252.
    19. Reindert K. Buter & Ed. C. M. Noyons & Anthony F. J. Raan, 2011. "Searching for converging research using field to field citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 325-338, February.
    20. Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chia-Pin Chang, 2014. "Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1721-1744, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3115-:d:901955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.