IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i12p2047-d837701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reminisce: Blockchain Private Key Generation and Recovery Using Distinctive Pictures-Based Personal Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Jungwon Seo

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sogang University, 915 Ricci Hall 35, Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Korea)

  • Deokyoon Ko

    (Nonce Lab Inc., 409 Seoul Startup Hub., 14 Magokjungang 8-ro, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07801, Korea)

  • Suntae Kim

    (Department of Software Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, 67 Baekje-daero, Deokin-gu, Jeonju-si 54896, Korea)

  • Vijayan Sugumaran

    (Department of Decision and Information Sciences, School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA
    Center for Data Science and Big Data Analytics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA)

  • Sooyong Park

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sogang University, 915A Ricci Hall 35, Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Korea)

Abstract

As a future game-changer in various industries, cryptocurrency is attracting people’s attention. Cryptocurrency is issued on blockchain and managed through a blockchain wallet application. The blockchain wallet manages user’s digital assets and authenticates a blockchain user by checking the possession of a user’s private key. The mnemonic code technique represents the most widely used method of generating and recovering a private key in blockchain wallet applications. However, the mnemonic code technique does not consider usability to generate and recover a user’s private key. In this study, we propose a novel approach for private key generation and recovery. Our approach is based on the idea that a user can hold long-term memory from distinctive pictures. The user can generate a private key by providing pictures and the location of the pictures. For recovering a private key, the user identifies the locations of the pictures that are used in the private key generation process. In this paper, we experiment with the security and usability of our approach and confirm that our proposed approach is sufficiently secure compared to the mnemonic code technique and accounts for usability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jungwon Seo & Deokyoon Ko & Suntae Kim & Vijayan Sugumaran & Sooyong Park, 2022. "Reminisce: Blockchain Private Key Generation and Recovery Using Distinctive Pictures-Based Personal Memory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:2047-:d:837701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/12/2047/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/12/2047/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spyros Makridakis & Klitos Christodoulou, 2019. "Blockchain: Current Challenges and Future Prospects/Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Lars Hornuf & Theresa Kück & Armin Schwienbacher, 2022. "Initial coin offerings, information disclosure, and fraud," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1741-1759, April.
    3. Tsan-Ming Choi, 2021. "Creating all-win by blockchain technology in supply chains: Impacts of agents’ risk attitudes towards cryptocurrency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(11), pages 2580-2595, November.
    4. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Siqin, Tana, 2022. "Blockchain in logistics and production from Blockchain 1.0 to Blockchain 5.0: An intra-inter-organizational framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Sean Foley & Jonathan R Karlsen & Tālis J Putniņš, 2019. "Sex, Drugs, and Bitcoin: How Much Illegal Activity Is Financed through Cryptocurrencies?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1798-1853.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Hornuf & Paul P. Momtaz & Rachel J. Nam & Ye Yuan, 2023. "Cybercrime on the Ethereum Blockchain," CESifo Working Paper Series 10598, CESifo.
    2. Tiwari, Sunil & Sharma, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Lim, Andrew, 2023. "Blockchain and third-party logistics for global supply chain operations: Stakeholders’ perspectives and decision roadmap," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Klaus Grobys & Timothy King & Niranjan Sapkota, 2022. "A Fractal View on Losses Attributable to Scams in the Market for Initial Coin Offerings," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. José Campino & Ana Brochado & Álvaro Rosa, 2021. "Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs): the importance of human capital," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(8), pages 1225-1262, October.
    5. Hanna Halaburda & Guillaume Haeringer & Joshua Gans & Neil Gandal, 2022. "The Microeconomics of Cryptocurrencies," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 971-1013, September.
    6. Goodell, John W. & Goutte, Stephane, 2021. "Co-movement of COVID-19 and Bitcoin: Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    7. Binh Nguyen Quang & Thai‐Ha Le & Canh Nguyen Phuc, 2022. "Influences of uncertainty on the returns and liquidity of cryptocurrencies: Evidence from a portfolio approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2497-2513, April.
    8. Anil Donmez & Alexander Karaivanov, 2022. "Transaction fee economics in the Ethereum blockchain," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 265-292, January.
    9. Erdogan Kaygin & Yunus Zengin & Ethem Topcuoglu & Serdal Ozkes, 2021. "The Evaluation of Block Chain Technology within the Scope of Ripple and Banking Activities," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 10(3), pages 153-167.
    10. Raphael Auer, 2019. "Beyond the doomsday economics of "proof-of-work" in cryptocurrencies," BIS Working Papers 765, Bank for International Settlements.
    11. Jason Scharfman, 2022. "Additional Crypto Operations and Compliance Topics," Springer Books, in: Cryptocurrency Compliance and Operations, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 205-221, Springer.
    12. Daniela Balutel & Walter Engert & Christopher S. Henry & Kim P. Huynh & Marcel Voia, 2024. "Explaining bitcoin ownership in Canada: Trends from 2016 to 2021," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 777-798, August.
    13. Ashton, John & Burnett, Tim & Diaz-Rainey, Ivan & Ormosi, Peter, 2021. "Known unknowns: How much financial misconduct is detected and deterred?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Smales, L.A., 2019. "Bitcoin as a safe haven: Is it even worth considering?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 385-393.
    15. Dyhrberg, Anne H. & Foley, Sean & Svec, Jiri, 2018. "How investible is Bitcoin? Analyzing the liquidity and transaction costs of Bitcoin markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 140-143.
    16. René M. Stulz, 2022. "FinTech, BigTech, and the Future of Banks," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 34(1), pages 106-117, March.
    17. Di Casola, Paola & Habib, Maurizio Michael & Tercero-Lucas, David, 2023. "Global and local drivers of Bitcoin trading vis-à-vis fiat currencies," Working Paper Series 2868, European Central Bank.
    18. Mohamed Chawki, 2022. "The Dark Web and the future of illicit drug markets," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 173-191, December.
    19. Yukun Liu & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2018. "Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency," NBER Working Papers 24877, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Paola Cerchiello & Anca Mirela Toma & Marco Caluzzi, 2021. "ICOs White Papers: identity card or lark mirror?," DEM Working Papers Series 197, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:2047-:d:837701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.