IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i1p10-d1317722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of Retail Warehouses: A Combined MCDM Approach Using G-BWM and RATMI

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah M. Barasin

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ammar Y. Alqahtani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Anas A. Makki

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering—Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background : The retail sector has experienced significant growth in recent years, necessitating efficient supply chain management and sustainable logistics practices. Evaluating the performance of retail warehouses is crucial for meeting customer expectations and enhancing operational efficiency. Methods : This study employed a combined multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, using the group best–worst method (G-BWM) for weighting criteria and ranking the alternatives based on the trace-to-median index (RATMI) for warehouse ranking. The performance criteria were cost, quality, time, productivity, and safety. Data were collected from four mega retail warehouses in the western region of Saudi Arabia for evaluation and analysis. Results : The evaluation of retail warehouse performance using the MCDM approach provided valuable insights for decision-makers and warehouse experts. The criteria weights were determined using the G-BWM, and the RATMI enabled the ranking of the warehouses based on their weighted performance scores. The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each warehouse, facilitating strategic planning, resource allocation, and operational improvements. Conclusions: This study presents a novel combined MCDM performance evaluation approach for retail warehouses. The study has implications for effective decision-making processes, resource allocation, and operational efficiency. Furthermore, it serves as a foundation for future research, exploring additional dimensions of warehouse performance and enabling sustainable logistics within the broader supply chain context.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah M. Barasin & Ammar Y. Alqahtani & Anas A. Makki, 2024. "Performance Evaluation of Retail Warehouses: A Combined MCDM Approach Using G-BWM and RATMI," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:10-:d:1317722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/1/10/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/1/10/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reda M. S. Abdulaal & Omer A. Bafail & Ghous Ali, 2022. "Two New Approaches (RAMS-RATMI) in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tactics," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-20, September.
    2. Katarina Urošević & Zoran Gligorić & Igor Miljanović & Čedomir Beljić & Miloš Gligorić, 2021. "Novel Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Process (MCRAT and RAPS)—Application in the Mining Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Rouwenhorst, B. & Reuter, B. & Stockrahm, V. & van Houtum, G. J. & Mantel, R. J. & Zijm, W. H. M., 2000. "Warehouse design and control: Framework and literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 515-533, May.
    4. Francielly Hedler Staudt & Gülgün Alpan & Maria Di Mascolo & Carlos M. Taboada Rodriguez, 2015. "Warehouse performance measurement: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5524-5544, September.
    5. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Şeyda Savalan, 2022. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Hybrid Methodology to Analyze Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Gils, Teun & Ramaekers, Katrien & Caris, An & de Koster, René B.M., 2018. "Designing efficient order picking systems by combining planning problems: State-of-the-art classification and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 1-15.
    2. I. Kudelska & G. Pawłowski, 2020. "Influence of assortment allocation management in the warehouse on the human workload," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 779-795, June.
    3. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Holzapfel, Andreas & Potoczki, Tobias & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2023. "Designing the breadth and depth of distribution networks in the retail trade," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    5. Parikh, Pratik J. & Meller, Russell D., 2010. "A travel-time model for a person-onboard order picking system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 385-394, January.
    6. Janka Saderova & Andrea Rosova & Marian Sofranko & Peter Kacmary, 2021. "Example of Warehouse System Design Based on the Principle of Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Reda M. S. Abdulaal & Anas A. Makki & Isam Y. Al-Filali, 2023. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Prioritizing Investment Initiatives to Achieve Financial Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions Using MEREC-G and RATMI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Gagliardi, Jean-Philippe & Ruiz, Angel & Renaud, Jacques, 2008. "Space allocation and stock replenishment synchronization in a distribution center," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 19-27, September.
    9. Anas A. Makki & Reda M. S. Abdulaal, 2023. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy MEREC-G and Fuzzy RATMI," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Mowrey, Corinne H. & Parikh, Pratik J., 2014. "Mixed-width aisle configurations for order picking in distribution centers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 87-97.
    11. Broekmeulen, Rob A.C.M. & Sternbeck, Michael G. & van Donselaar, Karel H. & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2017. "Decision support for selecting the optimal product unpacking location in a retail supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 84-99.
    12. de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto & Møller Clausen, Daniel & Bumann, Jendrik, 2023. "A multi-method approach for reducing operational wastes in distribution warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Gu, Jinxiang & Goetschalckx, Marc & McGinnis, Leon F., 2010. "Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 539-549, June.
    14. Wen, Hanguan & Liu, Xiufeng & Yang, Ming & Lei, Bo & Cheng, Xu & Chen, Zhe, 2023. "An energy demand-side management and net metering decision framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    15. Derhami, Shahab & Smith, Jeffrey S. & Gue, Kevin R., 2020. "A simulation-based optimization approach to design optimal layouts for block stacking warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Makris, P.A. & Makri, A.P. & Provatidis, C.G., 2006. "Energy-saving methodology for material handling applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(10), pages 1116-1124, October.
    17. Boysen, Nils & de Koster, René & Weidinger, Felix, 2019. "Warehousing in the e-commerce era: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 396-411.
    18. Zhe Yuan & Haoxuan Xu & Yeming (Yale) Gong & Chengbin Chu & Jinlong Zhang, 2017. "Designing public storage warehouses with high demand for revenue maximisation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(13), pages 3686-3700, July.
    19. Zhi Li & Ali Vatankhah Barenji & Jiazhi Jiang & Ray Y. Zhong & Gangyan Xu, 2020. "A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 469-480, February.
    20. Muppani (Muppant), Venkata Reddy & Adil, Gajendra Kumar, 2008. "Efficient formation of storage classes for warehouse storage location assignment: A simulated annealing approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 609-618, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:10-:d:1317722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.