IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v5y2021i3p59-d628145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production-Distribution Model Considering Traceability and Carbon Emission: A Case Study of the Indonesian Canned Fish Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dwi Iryaning Handayani

    (Industrial Engineering Department, University of Panca Marga, Probolinggo 67271, Indonesia)

  • Ilyas Masudin

    (Industrial Engineering Department, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65144, Indonesia)

  • Ahmad Rusdiansyah

    (Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Judi Suharsono

    (Accounting Department, University of Panca Marga, Probolinggo 67271, Indonesia)

Abstract

Background: Traceability systems and carbon emissions are two important factors involved in production and distribution activities. The involvement of these two factors in production and distribution activities along the supply chain will ensure the safety and quality of food through the manufacture, packaging and distribution of products with minimal costs and in an environmentally friendly way. Objective : This study aimed to develop a model of canned fish food production and distribution integration by considering traceability and carbon emissions to minimize total costs. Method: A mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) approach was used to develop mathematical models and the optimal solution of the model created was obtained using an open-source spreadsheet solver program. Results: The results show that the proposed models produce the minimum total production and distribution cost with high traceability and low carbon emissions. Conclusions: The sensitivity analysis from this study shows that there is a significant relationship between production, carbon emissions, and the total cost of production-distribution. Moreover, it was concluded that the production level, carbon emission level, and emission threshold can have a significant influence in the generation of the total carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwi Iryaning Handayani & Ilyas Masudin & Ahmad Rusdiansyah & Judi Suharsono, 2021. "Production-Distribution Model Considering Traceability and Carbon Emission: A Case Study of the Indonesian Canned Fish Food Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:5:y:2021:i:3:p:59-:d:628145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/5/3/59/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/5/3/59/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    2. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Nachtigall, Daniel & Venmans, Frank, 2023. "The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Moretti, Luca & Milani, Mario & Lozza, Giovanni Gustavo & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2021. "A detailed MILP formulation for the optimal design of advanced biofuel supply chains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 159-175.
    5. Wakhid Ahmad Jauhari, 2018. "A collaborative inventory model for vendor-buyer system with stochastic demand, defective items and carbon emission cost," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(2), pages 241-269.
    6. V. K. Manupati & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar & Stephan M. Wagner & Sai Krishna Pabba & R. Inder Raj Singh, 2020. "A blockchain-based approach for a multi-echelon sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 2222-2241, April.
    7. Meng, Xiaoge & Yao, Zhong & Nie, Jiajia & Zhao, Yingxue & Li, Zenglu, 2018. "Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 224-230.
    8. Rosič, Heidrun & Jammernegg, Werner, 2013. "The economic and environmental performance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 109-119.
    9. Panitas Sureeyatanapas & Kanittha Yodprang & Viganda Varabuntoonvit, 2021. "Drivers, Barriers and Benefits of Product Carbon Footprinting: A State-of-the-Art Survey of Thai Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Timpe, Christian H. & Kallrath, Josef, 2000. "Optimal planning in large multi-site production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 422-435, October.
    11. Sarkar, Biswajit & Ganguly, Baishakhi & Sarkar, Mitali & Pareek, Sarla, 2016. "Effect of variable transportation and carbon emission in a three-echelon supply chain model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 112-128.
    12. Baochen Yang & Chuanze Liu & Yunpeng Su & Xin Jing, 2017. "The Allocation of Carbon Intensity Reduction Target by 2020 among Industrial Sectors in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Ciwei Dong & Qingying Li & Bin Shen & Xun Tong, 2019. "Sustainability in Supply Chains with Behavioral Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-7, July.
    14. Jolayemi, Joel K. & Olorunniwo, Festus O., 2004. "A deterministic model for planning production quantities in a multi-plant, multi-warehouse environment with extensible capacities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 99-113, January.
    15. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    16. Dai, Bin & Nu, Yu & Xie, Xia & Li, Jianbin, 2021. "Interactions of traceability and reliability optimization in a competitive supply chain with product recall," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 116-131.
    17. Rendy Surya Saga & Wakhid Ahmad Jauhari & Pringgo Widyo Laksono & Anindya Rachma Dwicahyani, 2019. "Investigating carbon emissions in a production-inventory model under imperfect production, inspection errors and service-level constraint," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(1), pages 29-55.
    18. Hospido, A. & Vazquez, M.E. & Cuevas, A. & Feijoo, G. & Moreira, M.T., 2006. "Environmental assessment of canned tuna manufacture with a life-cycle perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 56-72.
    19. Warley Henrique Silva & Patricia Guarnieri & José Márcio Carvalho & Josivania Silva Farias & Silvia Araújo dos Reis, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Analyzing the Past to Determine a Research Agenda," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Zied Jemai & Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Tarkan Tan, 2017. "Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem," Post-Print hal-01672384, HAL.
    21. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Tan, Tarkan, 2017. "Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 520-533.
    22. Cheila Almeida & Sofia Vaz & Friederike Ziegler, 2015. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Canned Sardine Product from Portugal," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(4), pages 607-617, August.
    23. Ilyas Masudin & Evan Lau & Nika Tampi Safitri & Dian Palupi Restuputri & Dwi Iryaning Handayani, 2021. "The impact of the traceability of the information systems on humanitarian logistics performance: Case study of Indonesian relief logistics services," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1906052-190, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henriett Matyi & Péter Tamás, 2023. "An Innovative Framework for Quality Assurance in Logistics Packaging," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Jinhan Yu & Licheng Sun, 2022. "Supply Chain Emission Reduction Decisions, Considering Overconfidence under Conditions of Carbon Trading Price Volatility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Yang Lv & Xinhua Bi & Quanxi Li & Haowei Zhang, 2022. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making and Recycling Channel Selection under Carbon Allowance and Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Abudureheman Kadeer & Jinghan Yang & Shiyi Zhao, 2024. "Complexity Analysis of the Interaction between Government Carbon Quota Mechanism and Manufacturers’ Emission Reduction Strategies under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yosef Daryanto & Hui Ming Wee & Gede Agus Widyadana, 2019. "Low Carbon Supply Chain Coordination for Imperfect Quality Deteriorating Items," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Saberi, Sara, 2018. "Sustainable, multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carrier through reduction in pollution stock," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 421-444.
    3. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Chan, Chi Kin & Fang, Fei & Langevin, André, 2018. "Single-vendor multi-buyer supply chain coordination with stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 110-133.
    5. Meherishi, Lavanya & Narayana, Sushmita A. & Ranjani, K.S., 2021. "Integrated product and packaging decisions with secondary packaging returns and protective packaging management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 930-952.
    6. Fang, Yuan & Yu, Yugang & Shi, Ye & Liu, Jie, 2020. "The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Susu Cheng & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Regulatory pressure and consumer environmental awareness in a green supply chain with retailer responsibility: A dynamic analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 1133-1151, June.
    8. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.
    9. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2022. "A critical review of formal analytical modeling for blockchain technology in production, operations, and supply chains: Harnessing progress for future potential," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    10. Suchitra Pattnaik & Mitali Madhusmita Nayak & Stefano Abbate & Piera Centobelli, 2021. "Recent Trends in Sustainable Inventory Models: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Daiki Min & Kwanghun Chung, 2017. "A Joint Optimal Decision on Shipment Size and Carbon Reduction under Direct Shipment and Peddling Distribution Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Zhimiao Tao & Jiuping Xu, 2019. "Carbon-Regulated EOQ Models with Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Chen, Xi & Benjaafar, Saif & Elomri, Adel, 2019. "On the effectiveness of emission penalties in decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 1155-1167.
    14. Basim S. O. Alsaedi & Marwan H. Ahelali, 2024. "A Sustainable Supply Chain Model with Low Carbon Emissions for Deteriorating Imperfect-Quality Items under Learning Fuzzy Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-38, April.
    15. Ana Fernández‐Ríos & Sandra Ceballos‐Santos & Jara Laso & Cristina Campos & Jorge Cristóbal & María Margallo & Rubén Aldaco & Israel Ruiz‐Salmón, 2022. "From the sea to the table: The environmental impact assessment of fishing, processing, and end‐of‐life of albacore in Cantabria," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1934-1946, December.
    16. Dimitris Zissis & George Ioannou & Apostolos Burnetas, 2020. "Coordinating Lot Sizing Decisions Under Bilateral Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 371-387, February.
    17. Jans, R.F. & Degraeve, Z., 2005. "Modeling Industrial Lot Sizing Problems: A Review," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-049-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Sun, X.T. & Chung, S.H. & Chan, Felix T.S., 2015. "Integrated scheduling of a multi-product multi-factory manufacturing system with maritime transport limits," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 110-127.
    19. Tobias Rebs & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring & Margarita Stohler, 2018. "Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 197-237, September.
    20. Mazen A. Al-Sinan & Abdulaziz A. Bubshait & Fatimah Alamri, 2023. "Saudi Arabia’s Journey toward Net-Zero Emissions: Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:5:y:2021:i:3:p:59-:d:628145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.