IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v4y2020i2p9-d352753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparation of a Smart Port Indicator and Calculation of a Ranking for the Spanish Port System

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Rodrigo González

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil. Transportes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Nicoletta González-Cancelas

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil. Transportes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Beatriz Molina Serrano

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil. Transportes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alberto Camarero Orive

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil. Transportes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Nowadays, the denomination of “smart” is associated with several production and management devices and to logistics and distribution, too. Thus, this qualification is used in different application fields. All of them are different and diverse, but the most important common characteristics of these devices or Smart Systems are based on their novel and more efficient way of working. The smart trend is consolidated in the port environment, too. The ports’ need to become more intelligent is modifying their own operations. Therefore, this paper includes an analysis of Spanish Port System, in order to evaluate its ports, considering the new concept called “Smart Port”. Some indicators and measure variables are defined, to allow for quantifying technical items. These items—both quantitative and qualitative ones—which reflect, in the most objective and complete way possible, the adaptation and achievement of characteristics and objectives associated with the Smart Port concept in all ports were studied, in order to obtain an index of Smart Ports that allows us to calculate the ranking of the Spanish Smart Ports. Considering the analysis of the Smart Port concept and its current and future trends, it has been determined that the development of a port must be based on the digitalization, on use of ICT and on automation of port processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Rodrigo González & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Beatriz Molina Serrano & Alberto Camarero Orive, 2020. "Preparation of a Smart Port Indicator and Calculation of a Ranking for the Spanish Port System," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:9-:d:352753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/4/2/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/4/2/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatrice Tovar & Sergio Jara-Diaz & Lourdes Trujillo, 2003. "Production and cost functions and their application to the port sector : a literature survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3123, The World Bank.
    2. Beatriz Tovar de la Fe & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Lourdes Trujillo Castellano, 2004. "Funciones de producción y costes y su aplicación al sector portuario. Una revisión de la literatura," Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC 2004-06, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC.
    3. Alberto Camarero Orive & José Ignacio Parra Santiago & María Magdalena Esteban-Infantes Corral & Nicoletta González-Cancelas, 2020. "Strategic Analysis of the Automation of Container Port Terminals through BOT (Business Observation Tool)," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Tongzon, Jose, 2001. "Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 107-122, February.
    5. Giusti, Riccardo & Manerba, Daniele & Bruno, Giorgio & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "Synchromodal logistics: An overview of critical success factors, enabling technologies, and open research issues," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 92-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Azab & Jaehyun Park & Noha A. Mostafa, 2021. "Smart Mobile Application for Short-Haul Cargo Transportation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Li, Kevin X. & Li, Mengchi & Zhu, Yuhan & Yuen, Kum Fai & Tong, Hao & Zhou, Haoqing, 2023. "Smart port: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Antonios Paraskevas & Michael Madas & Vasileios Zeimpekis & Konstantinos Fouskas, 2024. "Smart Ports in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Alaa Othman & Sara El Gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Investigating the Influences of Smart Port Practices and Technology Employment on Port Sustainable Performance: The Egypt Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Nicoleta González-Cancelas & Beatriz Molina Serrano & Francisco Soler-Flores & Alberto Camarero-Orive, 2020. "Using the SWOT Methodology to Know the Scope of the Digitalization of the Spanish Ports," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, September.
    6. César Ducruet & Theo E. Notteboom, 2023. "A systematic and critical review of port system research," Post-Print halshs-04194563, HAL.
    7. Sheng-Che Lin & Hsien-Kuo Chang & Ying-Feng Chung, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Different Port Governances on Smart Port Development Strategy in Taiwan and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bichou, Khalid, 2006. "Chapter 24 Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 567-598, January.
    2. Figueiredo De Oliveira, Gabriel & Cariou, Pierre, 2015. "The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 124-133.
    3. Carlos Pestana Barros & Zhongfei Chen & Peter Wanke, 2016. "Efficiency in Chinese seaports: 2002–2012," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 295-316, September.
    4. George E. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2015. "Measuring Seaports' Productivity: A Malmquist Productivity Index Decomposition Approach," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(2), pages 355-376, April.
    5. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Renata Machado de Andrade & Suhyung Lee & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Hye Min Chung, 2019. "Port Efficiency Incorporating Service Measurement Variables by the BiO-MCDEA: Brazilian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Santiago Herrera & Gaobo Pang, 2008. "Eficiency of Infrastructure: The Case of Container Ports," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 9(1), pages 165-194.
    8. Wu, Xin (Bruce) & Lu, Jiawei & Wu, Shengnan & Zhou, Xuesong (Simon), 2021. "Synchronizing time-dependent transportation services: Reformulation and solution algorithm using quadratic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 140-179.
    9. Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Chapter 22 Port Performance: An Economics Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 499-516, January.
    10. Chiou, Yu-Chiun & Lan, Lawrence W. & Yen, Barbara T.H., 2012. "Route-based data envelopment analysis models," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 415-425.
    11. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "A Multi-step Approach to Model the Relative Efficiency of European Ports: The Role of Regulation and Other Non-discretionary Factors," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Kammoun Rabeb, 2018. "The Technical Efficiency of Tunisian Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis Scores," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 73-84, October.
    13. Andreas Papatheodorou, 2002. "Exploring Competitiveness in Mediterranean Resorts," Tourism Economics, , vol. 8(2), pages 133-150, June.
    14. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Yang Lin & Longzhong Yan & Ying-Ming Wang, 2019. "Performance Evaluation and Investment Analysis for Container Port Sustainable Development in China: An Inverse DEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Johannes Rentschler & Ralf Elbert & Felix Weber, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Synchromodal Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Fields of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Bokyung Kim & Geunsub Kim & Moohong Kang, 2022. "Study on Comparing the Performance of Fully Automated Container Terminals during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Vijay Prakash Sharma & Surya Prakash & Ranbir Singh, 2022. "What Prevents Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery in Industry 4.0? An Analysis and Decision Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Optimum Port Throughput," 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23-25, 2006 208010, Transportation Research Forum.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:9-:d:352753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.