IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v1y2016i1p2-d83655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparing for the Era of the Digitally Transparent Supply Chain: A Call to Research in a New Kind of Journal

Author

Listed:
  • Rob Handfield

    (Bank of America University Distinguished Professor, Executive Director of the Supply Chain Resource Cooperative, Poole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695, NC, USA)

Abstract

We are commencing a new era in global trade: the era of the digitized supply chain[...]

Suggested Citation

  • Rob Handfield, 2016. "Preparing for the Era of the Digitally Transparent Supply Chain: A Call to Research in a New Kind of Journal," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:2-:d:83655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/1/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/1/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleda Roth & Jaya Singhal & Kalyan Singhal & Christopher S. Tang, 2016. "Knowledge Creation and Dissemination in Operations and Supply Chain Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(9), pages 1473-1488, September.
    2. Benoit Morel & Rangaraj Ramanujam, 1999. "Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 278-293, June.
    3. Michael W. Toffel, 2016. "Enhancing the Practical Relevance of Research," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(9), pages 1493-1505, September.
    4. Donna Marshall & Richard Metters & Mark Pagell, 2016. "Changing a Leopard's Spots: A New Research Direction for Organizational Culture in the Operations Management Field," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(9), pages 1506-1512, September.
    5. Michael W. Toffel, 2016. "Enhancing the Practical Relevance of Research," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-082, Harvard Business School, revised Mar 2016.
    6. Bill McKelvey, 1999. "Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 294-321, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stüve, David & van der Meer, Robert & Lütke Entrup, Matthias & Agha, Mouhamad Shaker Ali, 2020. "Supply chain planning in the food industry," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science and Innovation in Supply Chain Management: How Data Transforms the Value Chain. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Lo, volume 29, pages 317-353, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Sergio Copiello, 2020. "Digital multimedia tools, research impact, stated and revealed preferences: a rejoinder on the issue of video abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 543-551, April.
    3. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    4. Ekinci, Esra & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sarma, P.R.S. & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa, 2022. "Resilience and complexity measurement for energy efficient global supply chains in disruptive events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    6. Schwartz-Landsman, V., 2020. "A Chasm to Cross: From Research to Practice and Back," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA 2020-081-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    7. McKelvey Bill, 2016. "Complexity Ingredients Required For Entrepreneurial Success," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 53-73, January.
    8. Kovacs, Gyöngyi & Moshtari, Mohammad, 2019. "A roadmap for higher research quality in humanitarian operations: A methodological perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 395-408.
    9. Celo, Sokol & Lehrer, Mark, 2022. "How much lateral collaboration is optimal? Insights from computer simulations of MNEs as complex adaptive systems," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    10. José A. Alfaro-Tanco & Miguel Mediavilla & Amaya Erro-Garcés, 2023. "Creating New Knowledge while Solving a Relevant Practical Problem: Success Factors for an Action Research-Based PhD Thesis in Business and Management," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 783-801, October.
    11. Brice Dattée & James Barlow, 2017. "Multilevel Organizational Adaptation: Scale Invariance in the Scottish Healthcare System," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 301-319, April.
    12. Erica Pimentel & Emilio Boulianne, 2020. "Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 325-361, December.
    13. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    14. Lili Wang & Min Li & Guanbin Kong & Haiwen Xu, 2024. "Joint decision-making for divisional seru scheduling and worker assignment considering process sequence constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1157-1185, July.
    15. Li, Dongni & Jiang, Yuzhou & Zhang, Jinhui & Cui, Zihua & Yin, Yong, 2023. "An on-line seru scheduling algorithm with proactive waiting considering resource conflicts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 506-515.
    16. Frenken, Koen, 2006. "A fitness landscape approach to technological complexity, modularity, and vertical disintegration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 288-305, September.
    17. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    18. Christina Fang & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Near-Term Liability of Exploitation: Exploration and Exploitation in Multistage Problems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 538-551, June.
    19. Sergey Samoilenko, 2008. "Information systems fitness and risk in IS development: Insights and implications from chaos and complex systems theories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 281-292, July.
    20. Sidney G. Winter & Gino Cattani & Alex Dorsch, 2007. "The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 403-419, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:2-:d:83655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.