IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v7y2018i1p3-d125467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedom of Opinion and Expression: From the Perspective of Psychosocial Disability and Madness

Author

Listed:
  • Fleur Beaupert

    (Independent Scholar, Sydney 2000, Australia)

Abstract

This article argues that civil mental health laws operate to constrict how people think, understand, and speak about psychosocial disability, madness, and mental distress. It does so with reference to views and experiences of mental health service users and psychiatric survivors (users and survivors) and their/our accounts of disability, madness, and distress, such as those articulated by the emerging field of Mad studies. The analysis considers the application of the rights to freedom of opinion and expression that are enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other international human rights instruments to the mental health context. The article explores the suppression of freedom of opinion and expression that is effected through the symbolic violence of psychiatry and the mental health paradigm. Focusing on Australian legal frameworks, the article discusses how the material violence and coercion characterising mental health laws compound this process. It is further argued that civil mental health laws, by codifying the tenets of psychiatry and the mental health paradigm so as to render them largely unassailable, validate the ontological nullification of users and survivors. The foregoing analysis exposes dangers of adopting a functional test of mental capacity as the pre-eminent legal standard for authorising involuntary mental health interventions. It is suggested that considering freedom of opinion and expression from the perspective of psychosocial disability and madness reinforces the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ interpretation that such interventions are incompatible with international human rights standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Fleur Beaupert, 2018. "Freedom of Opinion and Expression: From the Perspective of Psychosocial Disability and Madness," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:3-:d:125467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theresia Degener, 2016. "Disability in a Human Rights Context," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-24, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liz Brosnan, 2018. "Who’s Talking About Us Without Us? A Survivor Research Interjection into an Academic Psychiatry Debate on Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in Ireland," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & Gerard Quinn & James Rice, 2017. "The Inclusion of the Lived Experience of Disability in Policymaking," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & James Rice, 2019. "Shifting the Balance of Power: The Strategic Use of the CRPD by Disabled People’s Organizations in Securing ‘a Seat at the Table’," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Anne Revillard, 2018. "Vulnerable Rights: The Incomplete Realization of Disability Social Rights in France," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Kocejko, Magdalena, 2018. "Nic o nas bez nas? Zaangażowanie ruchu osób z niepełnosprawnościami w monitoring wdrażania Konwencji ONZ o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych w Polsce. Studium przypadku," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Vera Chouinard, 2018. "Living on the Global Peripheries of Law: Disability Human Rights Law in Principle and in Practice in the Global South," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Gabor Petri & Julie Beadle-Brown & Jill Bradshaw, 2017. "“More Honoured in the Breach than in the Observance”—Self-Advocacy and Human Rights," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Richard Lombard-Vance & Evelyn Soye & Delia Ferri & Emma McEvoy & Malcolm MacLachlan & Sari Sarlio-Siintola, 2023. "Applying the ‘Human Rights Model of Disability’ to Informed Consent: Experiences and Reflections from the SHAPES Project," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Liasidou, Anastasia & Mavrou, Katerina, 2017. "Disability rights in Higher Education Programs: The case of medical schools and other health-related disciplines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 143-150.
    9. Głąb, Zbigniew & Kurowski, Krzysztof, 2018. "W poszukiwaniu nowego systemu orzekania o niepełnosprawności w świetle Konwencji OZN o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych i idei niezależnego życia," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Mark C. Weber, 2017. "Protection for Privacy under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-12, August.
    11. James Gordon Rice & Helga Baldvins Bjargardóttir & Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir, 2020. "Child Protection, Disability and Obstetric Violence: Three Case Studies from Iceland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Mary Ann Jackson, 2018. "Models of Disability and Human Rights: Informing the Improvement of Built Environment Accessibility for People with Disability at Neighborhood Scale?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Linda Steele & Kate Swaffer & Lyn Phillipson & Richard Fleming, 2019. "Questioning Segregation of People Living with Dementia in Australia: An International Human Rights Approach to Care Homes," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:3-:d:125467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.