IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v7y2018i1p10-d135401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of Disability and Human Rights: Informing the Improvement of Built Environment Accessibility for People with Disability at Neighborhood Scale?

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Ann Jackson

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia
    Visionary Design Development Pty Ltd., North Melbourne 3051, Australia)

Abstract

In the 21st century, even with the advent of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), the existing built environment still fails the neighborhood accessibility needs of people with disability. People with disabilities’ human right to the neighborhood is, at face value, enshrined in legislation and ‘much’ built environment accessibility legislation is in place. But, built environment accessibility practice has been, and continues to be, shaped by a hidden discourse based on theoretical underpinnings little understood by built environment practitioners. Similarly, built environment practitioners have little understanding of either the diversity of the human condition or the accessibility needs of people with disability. In Australia, the operationalization of built environment accessibility rights is, via opaque legislation, not necessarily reflective of the lived experience of people with disability, and weak in terms of built environment spatial coverage. Empirically, little is known about the extent of built environment inaccessibility, particularly neighborhood inaccessibility. Therefore, the question explored in this paper is: How might an understanding of models of disability and human rights inform the improvement of built environment accessibility, for people with disability, at a neighborhood scale? Literature related to disability and human rights theory, built environment accessibility legislation primarily using Australia as an example, and built environment accessibility assessment is drawn together. This paper argues that built environment practitioners must recognize the disabling potency of current built environment practice, that built environment practitioners need to engage directly with people with disability to improve understanding of accessibility needs, and that improved measure, at neighborhood scale, of the extent of existing built environment inaccessibility is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Ann Jackson, 2018. "Models of Disability and Human Rights: Informing the Improvement of Built Environment Accessibility for People with Disability at Neighborhood Scale?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:10-:d:135401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/1/10/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/1/10/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mindell, Jennifer S. & Anciaes, Paulo R. & Dhanani, Ashley & Stockton, Jemima & Jones, Peter & Haklay, Muki & Groce, Nora & Scholes, Shaun & Vaughan, Laura, 2017. "Using triangulation to assess a suite of tools to measure community severance," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 119-129.
    2. Rimmer, J.H. & Riley, B. & Wang, E. & Rauworth, A., 2005. "Accessibility of health clubs for people with mobility disabilities and visual impairments," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(11), pages 2022-2028.
    3. Theresia Degener, 2016. "Disability in a Human Rights Context," Laws, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Bickenbach, Jerome E. & Chatterji, Somnath & Badley, E. M. & Üstün, T. B., 1999. "Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1173-1187, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ralph, Kelcie & Morris, Eric A. & Kwon, Jaekyeong, 2022. "Disability, access to out-of-home activities, and subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 209-227.
    2. Védaste Habamenshi & Dr. Sebastien Gasana, 2022. "Determinants of Gender Based Violence Against Women with Disabilities in Rwanda. A Case of Gakenke District," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(11), pages 183-199, November.
    3. Panagiotis GIAVRIMIS, 2023. "Intellectually Disabled Students. Education Inclusive Practices In Greece," Annals of the University of Craiova, Series Psychology, Pedagogy, Teacher Training Department, University of Craiova, vol. 45(2), pages 92-104, December.
    4. Levine, Kaylyn & Karner, Alex, 2023. "Approaching accessibility: Four opportunities to address the needs of disabled people in transportation planning in the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-74.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & Gerard Quinn & James Rice, 2017. "The Inclusion of the Lived Experience of Disability in Policymaking," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Lourdes Marco & Alejandro Pozo & Gabriel Huecas & Juan Quemada & Álvaro Alonso, 2021. "User-Adapted Web Services by Extending the eIDAS Specification with Functional Attributes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Andreas Jørgensen & Christina Bjørk Petersen & Martin Eghøj & Mette Toftager, 2021. "When Movement Moves: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Pre/Post Evaluation Study of Two Programmes; the Danish Team Twin and Cycling Without Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Badley, Elizabeth M., 2008. "Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2335-2345, June.
    5. Collins, Timothy W. & Nadybal, Shawna & Grineski, Sara E., 2020. "Sonic injustice: Disparate residential exposures to transport noise from road and aviation sources in the continental United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Anciaes, Paulo & Jones, Peter, 2020. "A comprehensive approach for the appraisal of the barrier effect of roads on pedestrians," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 227-250.
    7. Nimegeer, Amy & Thomson, Hilary & Foley, Louise & Hilton, Shona & Crawford, Fiona & Ogilvie, David, 2018. "Experiences of connectivity and severance in the wake of a new motorway: Implications for health and well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 78-86.
    8. Fen Yang & Chongming Yang & Yuzhong Liu & Shuzhen Peng & Bei Liu & Xudong Gao & Xiaodong Tan, 2016. "Associations between Body Mass Index and Visual Impairment of School Students in Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, October.
    9. Colin Barnes & Geof Mercer, 2005. "Disability, work, and welfare," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(3), pages 527-545, September.
    10. Anciaes, Paulo & Jones, Peter & Mindell, Jennifer S. & Scholes, Shaun, 2022. "The cost of the wider impacts of road traffic on local communities: 1.6% of Great Britain's GDP," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 266-287.
    11. Lundälv, Jörgen & Larsson, Per-Olof & Törnbom, Marie & Sunnerhagen, Katharina Stibrant, 2012. "The ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) – A Swiss army knife? Accessibility and disability in a Scandinavian disability magazine (SDM) – A quantitative conten," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 67-75.
    12. Puszka, Stefanie & Walsh, Corinne & Markham, Francis & Barney, Jody & Yap, Mandy & Dreise, Tony, 2022. "Towards the decolonisation of disability: A systematic review of disability conceptualisations, practices and experiences of First Nations people of Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    13. Natasha A. Layton & Emily J. Steel, 2015. "“An Environment Built to Include Rather than Exclude Me”: Creating Inclusive Environments for Human Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Fabio Meloni & Stefano Federici & John Lawrence Dennis, 2015. "Parents’ Education Shapes, but Does Not Originate, the Disability Representations of Their Children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Venkata S. Murthy Gudlavalleti, 2018. "Challenges in Accessing Health Care for People with Disability in the South Asian Context: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, October.
    16. David S. Vale & Fernando Ascensão & Nuno Raposo & António Pedro Figueiredo, 2017. "Comparing access for all: disability-induced accessibility disparity in Lisbon," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 43-64, January.
    17. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & James Rice, 2019. "Shifting the Balance of Power: The Strategic Use of the CRPD by Disabled People’s Organizations in Securing ‘a Seat at the Table’," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Rob Imrie, 2004. "The Role of the Building Regulations in Achieving Housing Quality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(3), pages 419-437, June.
    19. Adam Johnson & Richard Tucker & Hing-Wah Chau & Elmira Jamei, 2022. "Accessible and Inclusive Cities: Exposing Design and Leadership Challenges for Bunbury and Geelong," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12.
    20. Rouquette, Alexandra & Badley, Elizabeth M. & Falissard, Bruno & Dub, Timothée & Leplege, Alain & Coste, Joël, 2015. "Moderators, mediators, and bidirectional relationships in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework: An empirical investigation using a longitudinal design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 133-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:10-:d:135401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.